Loading…
Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study)
IntroductionSimulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), a...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMJ open 2023-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e073099-e073099 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3783-6f0017c8962e808ca8d81fe316652fc9fdd23ef4e61cb436cae444d6f8aaa9863 |
container_end_page | e073099 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | e073099 |
container_title | BMJ open |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Jee, Marcus Murphy, Ella Umana, Etimbuk O'Connor, Paul Khamoudes, Daniel McNicholl, Brian O’Donnell, John J James, Binchy |
description | IntroductionSimulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), and ensuring longevity of such programmes, can be difficult.ObjectiveWe aim to identify barriers and enablers to SBT in busy EDs.MethodsWe explored and analysed the thoughts, experience and opinions of professionals involved in SBT and organisational support. 32 participants across 15 international sites were invited to a semistructured interview process. We included participants from a variety of backgrounds, from clinical staff to management staff. Transcribed interview data was classified and coded based on capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour (COM-B) domains and analysed based on theoretical domains framework. Frequency of the most mentioned thematic domain among participants is reported.ResultsThe interview data revealed several common themes, including the following: knowledge and skills (90%), support and leadership (96%), mental barriers (87.5%), local culture (96.6%), dedicated space (65.2%), time constraints (46.8%), social influence (87.5%), education (90.6%), professional development (68.75%), exams (59.3%) and personal goals (93.75%). Management staff was observed to prioritise resource, staffing and flow, while the clinical cohort tended to focus on specialty and personal development when it came to simulation training in the ED.ConclusionPotential barriers and enablers to SBT and in situ simulation for EDs were identified through interviews conducted in this study. The central themes in terms of barriers and enablers were local culture, leadership, individual needs, resources and optimisation. A tailored approach is vital for establishing a successful SBT and in situ simulation programme. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073099 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_deece82e478247b1ae5ca180970a2243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_deece82e478247b1ae5ca180970a2243</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2861644554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3783-6f0017c8962e808ca8d81fe316652fc9fdd23ef4e61cb436cae444d6f8aaa9863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdks1u1TAQhSMEolXpE7CJxKYsAv6LY7NBtFygUiUWLWtrYk8uvkrsWzup6CPw1vj-CFG8sY_nzCePdarqNSXvKOXyfT9t4hZDwwjjDek40fpZdcqIEI0kbfv8n_NJdZ7zhpQlWt227GV1wjspteLtafV79Ws7xuTDuu4hJY8p1xBcjQH6cSfmWGc_LSPMPoamh4yunhP4sGvxocYJ0xqDfawdbiHNE4Y5fyiMUpwxhX0fjPX9AqOfi3rAOs-Le6wvLle3d83qc327k29fVS8GGDOeH_ez6seX1d3Vt-bm-9frq083jeWd4o0cCKGdVVoyVERZUE7RATmVsmWD1YNzjOMgUFLbCy4toBDCyUEBgFaSn1XXB66LsDHb5CdIjyaCN_uLmNamjOHtiMYhWlQMRaeY6HoK2FqgiuiOAGOCF9bHA2u79BM6W2ZPMD6BPq0E_9Os44OhRCjaCV0IF0dCivcL5tlMPlscRwgYl2yYklQK0baiWN_8Z93EpXzwuHeRTlOuu-LiB5dNMeeEw9_XUGJ20THH6JhddMwhOvwPqfO5vA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2860791397</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study)</title><source>BMJ Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>BMJ Journals</source><creator>Jee, Marcus ; Murphy, Ella ; Umana, Etimbuk ; O'Connor, Paul ; Khamoudes, Daniel ; McNicholl, Brian ; O’Donnell, John J ; James, Binchy</creator><creatorcontrib>Jee, Marcus ; Murphy, Ella ; Umana, Etimbuk ; O'Connor, Paul ; Khamoudes, Daniel ; McNicholl, Brian ; O’Donnell, John J ; James, Binchy</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionSimulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), and ensuring longevity of such programmes, can be difficult.ObjectiveWe aim to identify barriers and enablers to SBT in busy EDs.MethodsWe explored and analysed the thoughts, experience and opinions of professionals involved in SBT and organisational support. 32 participants across 15 international sites were invited to a semistructured interview process. We included participants from a variety of backgrounds, from clinical staff to management staff. Transcribed interview data was classified and coded based on capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour (COM-B) domains and analysed based on theoretical domains framework. Frequency of the most mentioned thematic domain among participants is reported.ResultsThe interview data revealed several common themes, including the following: knowledge and skills (90%), support and leadership (96%), mental barriers (87.5%), local culture (96.6%), dedicated space (65.2%), time constraints (46.8%), social influence (87.5%), education (90.6%), professional development (68.75%), exams (59.3%) and personal goals (93.75%). Management staff was observed to prioritise resource, staffing and flow, while the clinical cohort tended to focus on specialty and personal development when it came to simulation training in the ED.ConclusionPotential barriers and enablers to SBT and in situ simulation for EDs were identified through interviews conducted in this study. The central themes in terms of barriers and enablers were local culture, leadership, individual needs, resources and optimisation. A tailored approach is vital for establishing a successful SBT and in situ simulation programme.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2044-6055</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073099</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37669835</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medicine ; Hospitals ; Interviews ; Managers ; Qualitative research ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>BMJ open, 2023-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e073099-e073099</ispartof><rights>2023 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3783-6f0017c8962e808ca8d81fe316652fc9fdd23ef4e61cb436cae444d6f8aaa9863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2940-0716</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2860791397/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2860791397?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3194,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jee, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Ella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umana, Etimbuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khamoudes, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNicholl, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Binchy</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study)</title><title>BMJ open</title><description>IntroductionSimulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), and ensuring longevity of such programmes, can be difficult.ObjectiveWe aim to identify barriers and enablers to SBT in busy EDs.MethodsWe explored and analysed the thoughts, experience and opinions of professionals involved in SBT and organisational support. 32 participants across 15 international sites were invited to a semistructured interview process. We included participants from a variety of backgrounds, from clinical staff to management staff. Transcribed interview data was classified and coded based on capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour (COM-B) domains and analysed based on theoretical domains framework. Frequency of the most mentioned thematic domain among participants is reported.ResultsThe interview data revealed several common themes, including the following: knowledge and skills (90%), support and leadership (96%), mental barriers (87.5%), local culture (96.6%), dedicated space (65.2%), time constraints (46.8%), social influence (87.5%), education (90.6%), professional development (68.75%), exams (59.3%) and personal goals (93.75%). Management staff was observed to prioritise resource, staffing and flow, while the clinical cohort tended to focus on specialty and personal development when it came to simulation training in the ED.ConclusionPotential barriers and enablers to SBT and in situ simulation for EDs were identified through interviews conducted in this study. The central themes in terms of barriers and enablers were local culture, leadership, individual needs, resources and optimisation. A tailored approach is vital for establishing a successful SBT and in situ simulation programme.</description><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>2044-6055</issn><issn>2044-6055</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdks1u1TAQhSMEolXpE7CJxKYsAv6LY7NBtFygUiUWLWtrYk8uvkrsWzup6CPw1vj-CFG8sY_nzCePdarqNSXvKOXyfT9t4hZDwwjjDek40fpZdcqIEI0kbfv8n_NJdZ7zhpQlWt227GV1wjspteLtafV79Ws7xuTDuu4hJY8p1xBcjQH6cSfmWGc_LSPMPoamh4yunhP4sGvxocYJ0xqDfawdbiHNE4Y5fyiMUpwxhX0fjPX9AqOfi3rAOs-Le6wvLle3d83qc327k29fVS8GGDOeH_ez6seX1d3Vt-bm-9frq083jeWd4o0cCKGdVVoyVERZUE7RATmVsmWD1YNzjOMgUFLbCy4toBDCyUEBgFaSn1XXB66LsDHb5CdIjyaCN_uLmNamjOHtiMYhWlQMRaeY6HoK2FqgiuiOAGOCF9bHA2u79BM6W2ZPMD6BPq0E_9Os44OhRCjaCV0IF0dCivcL5tlMPlscRwgYl2yYklQK0baiWN_8Z93EpXzwuHeRTlOuu-LiB5dNMeeEw9_XUGJ20THH6JhddMwhOvwPqfO5vA</recordid><startdate>20230905</startdate><enddate>20230905</enddate><creator>Jee, Marcus</creator><creator>Murphy, Ella</creator><creator>Umana, Etimbuk</creator><creator>O'Connor, Paul</creator><creator>Khamoudes, Daniel</creator><creator>McNicholl, Brian</creator><creator>O’Donnell, John J</creator><creator>James, Binchy</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-0716</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230905</creationdate><title>Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study)</title><author>Jee, Marcus ; Murphy, Ella ; Umana, Etimbuk ; O'Connor, Paul ; Khamoudes, Daniel ; McNicholl, Brian ; O’Donnell, John J ; James, Binchy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3783-6f0017c8962e808ca8d81fe316652fc9fdd23ef4e61cb436cae444d6f8aaa9863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jee, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Ella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Umana, Etimbuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khamoudes, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNicholl, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, John J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Binchy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jee, Marcus</au><au>Murphy, Ella</au><au>Umana, Etimbuk</au><au>O'Connor, Paul</au><au>Khamoudes, Daniel</au><au>McNicholl, Brian</au><au>O’Donnell, John J</au><au>James, Binchy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study)</atitle><jtitle>BMJ open</jtitle><date>2023-09-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e073099</spage><epage>e073099</epage><pages>e073099-e073099</pages><issn>2044-6055</issn><eissn>2044-6055</eissn><abstract>IntroductionSimulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), and ensuring longevity of such programmes, can be difficult.ObjectiveWe aim to identify barriers and enablers to SBT in busy EDs.MethodsWe explored and analysed the thoughts, experience and opinions of professionals involved in SBT and organisational support. 32 participants across 15 international sites were invited to a semistructured interview process. We included participants from a variety of backgrounds, from clinical staff to management staff. Transcribed interview data was classified and coded based on capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour (COM-B) domains and analysed based on theoretical domains framework. Frequency of the most mentioned thematic domain among participants is reported.ResultsThe interview data revealed several common themes, including the following: knowledge and skills (90%), support and leadership (96%), mental barriers (87.5%), local culture (96.6%), dedicated space (65.2%), time constraints (46.8%), social influence (87.5%), education (90.6%), professional development (68.75%), exams (59.3%) and personal goals (93.75%). Management staff was observed to prioritise resource, staffing and flow, while the clinical cohort tended to focus on specialty and personal development when it came to simulation training in the ED.ConclusionPotential barriers and enablers to SBT and in situ simulation for EDs were identified through interviews conducted in this study. The central themes in terms of barriers and enablers were local culture, leadership, individual needs, resources and optimisation. A tailored approach is vital for establishing a successful SBT and in situ simulation programme.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><pmid>37669835</pmid><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073099</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2940-0716</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2044-6055 |
ispartof | BMJ open, 2023-09, Vol.13 (9), p.e073099-e073099 |
issn | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_deece82e478247b1ae5ca180970a2243 |
source | BMJ Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database; BMJ Journals |
subjects | Emergency medical care Emergency Medicine Hospitals Interviews Managers Qualitative research Simulation |
title | Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A14%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20barriers%20and%20enablers%20to%20simulation-based%20training%20in%20emergency%20departments:%20an%20international%20qualitative%20study%20(BEST-ED%20Study)&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20open&rft.au=Jee,%20Marcus&rft.date=2023-09-05&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e073099&rft.epage=e073099&rft.pages=e073099-e073099&rft.issn=2044-6055&rft.eissn=2044-6055&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2861644554%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3783-6f0017c8962e808ca8d81fe316652fc9fdd23ef4e61cb436cae444d6f8aaa9863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2860791397&rft_id=info:pmid/37669835&rfr_iscdi=true |