Loading…
Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption?
This study had a threefold aim: to test the value of stakeholder involvement in HTA to reduce evidence gaps and interpret findings; and to assess a medical device by applying the EUnetHTA Core Model (CM) in South Africa and thus ultimately provide a first overview of evidence for potential widesprea...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cost effectiveness and resource allocation 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.8-8, Article 8 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893 |
container_end_page | 8 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Cost effectiveness and resource allocation |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Mueller, Debjani Pattinson, Robert C Hlongwane, Tsakane M Busse, Reinhard Panteli, Dimitra |
description | This study had a threefold aim: to test the value of stakeholder involvement in HTA to reduce evidence gaps and interpret findings; and to assess a medical device by applying the EUnetHTA Core Model (CM) in South Africa and thus ultimately provide a first overview of evidence for potential widespread adoption of the technology in a primary health care (PHC) setting. Used in primary healthcare setting for obstetric use, the technology under assessment is a low-cost continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (DUS).
The scoping of the assessment was defined by involving policy makers in selecting the domains and corresponding questions relevant to the ultrasound and its use. Additionally, hospital managers were invited to respond to dichotomous questions on the criteria for procurement. To substantiate evidence obtained from an initial literature review, different stakeholders were identified and consulted. The evidence generated fromall steps was used to populate the high-ranked assessment elements of the CM.
The HTA on continuous-wave DUS incorporated the evidence on organizational, ethical, and social value of its use together with effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the technology. The domains on "health problem" and "safety" had a higher rank than the rest of the nine domains. Unexplained fetal mortality is the largest single contributor to perinatal deaths in South Africa. Pregnant women in PHC setting were examined using a continuous-wave DUS, after their routine antenatal visit. The healthcare professionals interviewed, indicated the benefit in the use of continuous-wave DUS in the PHC setting and the need for training.
Collection and generation of evidence based on the HTA CM and the chosen decision criteria provided a generalized but structured guidance on the methodology. Several questions were not applicable for the technology and the context of its use and elimination of those that are inappropriate for the African context, resulted in a pragmatic solution. Engaging and consulting local stakeholders was imperative to understand the context, reduce evidence gaps, and address the uncertainties in the evidence, ultimately paving the way for technology adoption. Given the ongoing studies and the evolving evidence base, the potential of this technology should be reassessed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12962-021-00261-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_def883b645644e418544385cfe6c67ad</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A653602398</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_def883b645644e418544385cfe6c67ad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A653602398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAhyQJS5cUvwvjpcDaLUUWqkIJNqz5TjjjVdee3GSRe2z8LA43aV0EfLB1sxvvtGMv6J4SfApIVK87QmdCVpiSkqMqSDl7aPimPBalnXF68cP3kfFs75fZYhRLJ8WR4xVUsqaHBe_vsU06MYDMjEMLoxx7NFPvQX0MW42HhIa_ZB0H8fQIhsT2iS31ukGdaD90BmdALmAvsdx6NDcJmf0O2R0QEMH6Ow6wHB-NUeLmLEvsQWPlqNrAcFW-1EPLgbUgJ2yA5guRB-XN0i3cTOlPjwvnljte3ixv0-K609nV4vz8vLr54vF_LI0lWBDKYytCeYaMwAiKIfaai0bg0WjDW9AwIwQImwNvKqNACFwTVvGa9pYrOWMnRQXO9026pXaT6iiduouENNS6TQ440G1YKVkjeCV4Bw4kRXnTFbGgjCi1m3Wer_T2ozNGloDIa_PH4geZoLr1DJuVS1lxQTOAm_2Ain-GKEf1Nr1BrzXAfLnKMpnmFA8EySjr_9BV3FMIa9qoginJH_yX2qp8wAu2Jj7mklUzcXUkrKZzNTpf6h8Wli77A2wLscPCuiuwKTY9wns_YwEq8mfaudPlf2p7vypbnPRq4fbuS_5Y0j2GzqM4pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2491421887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption?</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>PMC (PubMed Central)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Mueller, Debjani ; Pattinson, Robert C ; Hlongwane, Tsakane M ; Busse, Reinhard ; Panteli, Dimitra</creator><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Debjani ; Pattinson, Robert C ; Hlongwane, Tsakane M ; Busse, Reinhard ; Panteli, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><description>This study had a threefold aim: to test the value of stakeholder involvement in HTA to reduce evidence gaps and interpret findings; and to assess a medical device by applying the EUnetHTA Core Model (CM) in South Africa and thus ultimately provide a first overview of evidence for potential widespread adoption of the technology in a primary health care (PHC) setting. Used in primary healthcare setting for obstetric use, the technology under assessment is a low-cost continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (DUS).
The scoping of the assessment was defined by involving policy makers in selecting the domains and corresponding questions relevant to the ultrasound and its use. Additionally, hospital managers were invited to respond to dichotomous questions on the criteria for procurement. To substantiate evidence obtained from an initial literature review, different stakeholders were identified and consulted. The evidence generated fromall steps was used to populate the high-ranked assessment elements of the CM.
The HTA on continuous-wave DUS incorporated the evidence on organizational, ethical, and social value of its use together with effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the technology. The domains on "health problem" and "safety" had a higher rank than the rest of the nine domains. Unexplained fetal mortality is the largest single contributor to perinatal deaths in South Africa. Pregnant women in PHC setting were examined using a continuous-wave DUS, after their routine antenatal visit. The healthcare professionals interviewed, indicated the benefit in the use of continuous-wave DUS in the PHC setting and the need for training.
Collection and generation of evidence based on the HTA CM and the chosen decision criteria provided a generalized but structured guidance on the methodology. Several questions were not applicable for the technology and the context of its use and elimination of those that are inappropriate for the African context, resulted in a pragmatic solution. Engaging and consulting local stakeholders was imperative to understand the context, reduce evidence gaps, and address the uncertainties in the evidence, ultimately paving the way for technology adoption. Given the ongoing studies and the evolving evidence base, the potential of this technology should be reassessed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-7547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12962-021-00261-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33588871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Births ; Decision making ; Doppler ultrasound ; Health aspects ; Health facilities ; Health services ; Health technology assessment ; Hospitals ; Industrialized nations ; Infants ; Maternal mortality ; Medical equipment ; Obstetrics ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological apparatus ; Pregnant women ; Prenatal care ; Primary care ; Primary health care ; Public health ; Rankings ; South africa ; Stakeholders ; Stillbirth ; Technology ; Technology adoption ; Technology application ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation, 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.8-8, Article 8</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7796-982X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7885360/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2491421887?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11667,25731,27901,27902,36037,36038,36989,36990,44339,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33588871$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Debjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hlongwane, Tsakane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busse, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteli, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><title>Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption?</title><title>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation</title><addtitle>Cost Eff Resour Alloc</addtitle><description>This study had a threefold aim: to test the value of stakeholder involvement in HTA to reduce evidence gaps and interpret findings; and to assess a medical device by applying the EUnetHTA Core Model (CM) in South Africa and thus ultimately provide a first overview of evidence for potential widespread adoption of the technology in a primary health care (PHC) setting. Used in primary healthcare setting for obstetric use, the technology under assessment is a low-cost continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (DUS).
The scoping of the assessment was defined by involving policy makers in selecting the domains and corresponding questions relevant to the ultrasound and its use. Additionally, hospital managers were invited to respond to dichotomous questions on the criteria for procurement. To substantiate evidence obtained from an initial literature review, different stakeholders were identified and consulted. The evidence generated fromall steps was used to populate the high-ranked assessment elements of the CM.
The HTA on continuous-wave DUS incorporated the evidence on organizational, ethical, and social value of its use together with effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the technology. The domains on "health problem" and "safety" had a higher rank than the rest of the nine domains. Unexplained fetal mortality is the largest single contributor to perinatal deaths in South Africa. Pregnant women in PHC setting were examined using a continuous-wave DUS, after their routine antenatal visit. The healthcare professionals interviewed, indicated the benefit in the use of continuous-wave DUS in the PHC setting and the need for training.
Collection and generation of evidence based on the HTA CM and the chosen decision criteria provided a generalized but structured guidance on the methodology. Several questions were not applicable for the technology and the context of its use and elimination of those that are inappropriate for the African context, resulted in a pragmatic solution. Engaging and consulting local stakeholders was imperative to understand the context, reduce evidence gaps, and address the uncertainties in the evidence, ultimately paving the way for technology adoption. Given the ongoing studies and the evolving evidence base, the potential of this technology should be reassessed.</description><subject>Births</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Doppler ultrasound</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Prenatal care</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Rankings</subject><subject>South africa</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Stillbirth</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>1478-7547</issn><issn>1478-7547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks9u1DAQxiMEoqXwAhyQJS5cUvwvjpcDaLUUWqkIJNqz5TjjjVdee3GSRe2z8LA43aV0EfLB1sxvvtGMv6J4SfApIVK87QmdCVpiSkqMqSDl7aPimPBalnXF68cP3kfFs75fZYhRLJ8WR4xVUsqaHBe_vsU06MYDMjEMLoxx7NFPvQX0MW42HhIa_ZB0H8fQIhsT2iS31ukGdaD90BmdALmAvsdx6NDcJmf0O2R0QEMH6Ow6wHB-NUeLmLEvsQWPlqNrAcFW-1EPLgbUgJ2yA5guRB-XN0i3cTOlPjwvnljte3ixv0-K609nV4vz8vLr54vF_LI0lWBDKYytCeYaMwAiKIfaai0bg0WjDW9AwIwQImwNvKqNACFwTVvGa9pYrOWMnRQXO9026pXaT6iiduouENNS6TQ440G1YKVkjeCV4Bw4kRXnTFbGgjCi1m3Wer_T2ozNGloDIa_PH4geZoLr1DJuVS1lxQTOAm_2Ain-GKEf1Nr1BrzXAfLnKMpnmFA8EySjr_9BV3FMIa9qoginJH_yX2qp8wAu2Jj7mklUzcXUkrKZzNTpf6h8Wli77A2wLscPCuiuwKTY9wns_YwEq8mfaudPlf2p7vypbnPRq4fbuS_5Y0j2GzqM4pg</recordid><startdate>20210215</startdate><enddate>20210215</enddate><creator>Mueller, Debjani</creator><creator>Pattinson, Robert C</creator><creator>Hlongwane, Tsakane M</creator><creator>Busse, Reinhard</creator><creator>Panteli, Dimitra</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-982X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210215</creationdate><title>Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption?</title><author>Mueller, Debjani ; Pattinson, Robert C ; Hlongwane, Tsakane M ; Busse, Reinhard ; Panteli, Dimitra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Births</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Doppler ultrasound</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Prenatal care</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Rankings</topic><topic>South africa</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Stillbirth</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Debjani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hlongwane, Tsakane M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busse, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteli, Dimitra</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mueller, Debjani</au><au>Pattinson, Robert C</au><au>Hlongwane, Tsakane M</au><au>Busse, Reinhard</au><au>Panteli, Dimitra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption?</atitle><jtitle>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation</jtitle><addtitle>Cost Eff Resour Alloc</addtitle><date>2021-02-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>8-8</pages><artnum>8</artnum><issn>1478-7547</issn><eissn>1478-7547</eissn><abstract>This study had a threefold aim: to test the value of stakeholder involvement in HTA to reduce evidence gaps and interpret findings; and to assess a medical device by applying the EUnetHTA Core Model (CM) in South Africa and thus ultimately provide a first overview of evidence for potential widespread adoption of the technology in a primary health care (PHC) setting. Used in primary healthcare setting for obstetric use, the technology under assessment is a low-cost continuous wave Doppler ultrasound (DUS).
The scoping of the assessment was defined by involving policy makers in selecting the domains and corresponding questions relevant to the ultrasound and its use. Additionally, hospital managers were invited to respond to dichotomous questions on the criteria for procurement. To substantiate evidence obtained from an initial literature review, different stakeholders were identified and consulted. The evidence generated fromall steps was used to populate the high-ranked assessment elements of the CM.
The HTA on continuous-wave DUS incorporated the evidence on organizational, ethical, and social value of its use together with effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the technology. The domains on "health problem" and "safety" had a higher rank than the rest of the nine domains. Unexplained fetal mortality is the largest single contributor to perinatal deaths in South Africa. Pregnant women in PHC setting were examined using a continuous-wave DUS, after their routine antenatal visit. The healthcare professionals interviewed, indicated the benefit in the use of continuous-wave DUS in the PHC setting and the need for training.
Collection and generation of evidence based on the HTA CM and the chosen decision criteria provided a generalized but structured guidance on the methodology. Several questions were not applicable for the technology and the context of its use and elimination of those that are inappropriate for the African context, resulted in a pragmatic solution. Engaging and consulting local stakeholders was imperative to understand the context, reduce evidence gaps, and address the uncertainties in the evidence, ultimately paving the way for technology adoption. Given the ongoing studies and the evolving evidence base, the potential of this technology should be reassessed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33588871</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12962-021-00261-z</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-982X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-7547 |
ispartof | Cost effectiveness and resource allocation, 2021-02, Vol.19 (1), p.8-8, Article 8 |
issn | 1478-7547 1478-7547 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_def883b645644e418544385cfe6c67ad |
source | ABI/INFORM global; PMC (PubMed Central); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Births Decision making Doppler ultrasound Health aspects Health facilities Health services Health technology assessment Hospitals Industrialized nations Infants Maternal mortality Medical equipment Obstetrics Patient outcomes Physiological apparatus Pregnant women Prenatal care Primary care Primary health care Public health Rankings South africa Stakeholders Stillbirth Technology Technology adoption Technology application Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Portable continuous wave Doppler ultrasound for primary healthcare in South Africa: can the EUnetHTA Core Model guide evaluation before technology adoption? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portable%20continuous%20wave%20Doppler%20ultrasound%20for%20primary%20healthcare%20in%20South%20Africa:%20can%20the%20EUnetHTA%20Core%20Model%20guide%20evaluation%20before%20technology%20adoption?&rft.jtitle=Cost%20effectiveness%20and%20resource%20allocation&rft.au=Mueller,%20Debjani&rft.date=2021-02-15&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=8-8&rft.artnum=8&rft.issn=1478-7547&rft.eissn=1478-7547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12962-021-00261-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA653602398%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-6cf7104a03ee1624e7faa8bc06bac4be6e91116f7e457c6e66072d3472bf0a893%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2491421887&rft_id=info:pmid/33588871&rft_galeid=A653602398&rfr_iscdi=true |