Loading…

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates

This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of bone conditions and osseointegration rates on the stress distribution of short implants using finite element analysis and also to provide some reference for the application of short implants from a biomechanical prospect. Anisotropic jaw bone model...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC oral health 2023-04, Vol.23 (1), p.220-220, Article 220
Main Authors: Yang, Yunhe, Liu, Yuchen, Yuan, Xi, Ren, Mingfa, Chen, Xiaodong, Luo, Lailong, Zheng, Lang, Liu, Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3
container_end_page 220
container_issue 1
container_start_page 220
container_title BMC oral health
container_volume 23
creator Yang, Yunhe
Liu, Yuchen
Yuan, Xi
Ren, Mingfa
Chen, Xiaodong
Luo, Lailong
Zheng, Lang
Liu, Yang
description This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of bone conditions and osseointegration rates on the stress distribution of short implants using finite element analysis and also to provide some reference for the application of short implants from a biomechanical prospect. Anisotropic jaw bone models with three bone conditions and 4.1 × 6 mm implant models were created, and four osseointegration rates were simulated. Stress and strain for the implants and jaws were calculated during vertical or oblique loading. The cortical bone area around the implant neck was most stressed. The maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone increased with bone deterioration and osseointegration rate, with maximum values of 144.32 MPa and 203.94 MPa for vertical and inclined loading, respectively. The osseointegration rate had the greatest effect on the maximum principal stress in cortical bone of type III bone, with its value increasing by 63.8% at a 100% osseointegration rate versus a 25% osseointegration rate. The maximum and minimum principal stresses under inclined load are 1.3 ~ 1.7 and 1.4 ~ 1.8 times, respectively, those under vertical load. The stress on the jaw bone did not exceed the threshold when the osseointegration rate was ≥ 50% for Type II and 100% for Type III. High strain zones are found in cancellous bone, and the maximum strain increases as the bone condition deteriorate and the rate of osseointegration decreases. The maximum stress in the jaw bone increases as the bone condition deteriorates and the osseointegration rate increases. Increased osseointegration rate reduces cancellous bone strain and improves implant stability without exceeding the yield strength of the cortical bone. When the bone condition is good, and the osseointegration ratio is relatively high, 6 mm short implants can be used. In clinical practice, incline loading is an unfavorable loading condition, and axial loading should be used as much as possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_df2560c9d03d4529bc840f36ca32c93c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A745809707</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_df2560c9d03d4529bc840f36ca32c93c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A745809707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4IAiceGSMo5jOz6hquKjUiUu5Ww59njXq2xc7Cyo_4EfzWS3lC5CjmXr5b03Gs-rqtcMzhnr5fvCWg28gXbZuhONflKdsk61jew5e_roflK9KGUDwFTfdc-rE65AMinVafXrZp0RGx-3OJWYJjvWIU5xxhpHJGyuLWF3JZY6hbrMGUupfaRLHHYzCWr6yjrluY7b29FOc6l_xnlNnBAwLwZDmrB2afJx4Rcy9HUqBVOcZlxlu3ehA8vL6lmwY8FX9-dZ9e3Tx5vLL831189XlxfXjROymxtlQUhnBwTOmWYAvQ2hVwPBXLDeWycl6t57GQA67sQgXCescsq3rtOBn1VXB1-f7Mbc5ri1-c4kG80eSHllbJ6jG9H40AoJTnvgvhOtHlzfQeBUnrdOc0deHw5et7thi95Rx9mOR6bHf6a4Nqv0wzBgIHSryOHdvUNO33dYZrONxeFIj4lpV0zbA9NKApNEffsPdZN2mQa0Z3EAyaX4y1pZ6iBOIVFht5iaC9WJHrSCpez5f1i0PG4jjQtDJPxI0B4ELtP4MoaHJhmYJZDmEEhDgTT7QBpNojePn-dB8ieB_DdU195K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2803006365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yang, Yunhe ; Liu, Yuchen ; Yuan, Xi ; Ren, Mingfa ; Chen, Xiaodong ; Luo, Lailong ; Zheng, Lang ; Liu, Yang</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunhe ; Liu, Yuchen ; Yuan, Xi ; Ren, Mingfa ; Chen, Xiaodong ; Luo, Lailong ; Zheng, Lang ; Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><description>This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of bone conditions and osseointegration rates on the stress distribution of short implants using finite element analysis and also to provide some reference for the application of short implants from a biomechanical prospect. Anisotropic jaw bone models with three bone conditions and 4.1 × 6 mm implant models were created, and four osseointegration rates were simulated. Stress and strain for the implants and jaws were calculated during vertical or oblique loading. The cortical bone area around the implant neck was most stressed. The maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone increased with bone deterioration and osseointegration rate, with maximum values of 144.32 MPa and 203.94 MPa for vertical and inclined loading, respectively. The osseointegration rate had the greatest effect on the maximum principal stress in cortical bone of type III bone, with its value increasing by 63.8% at a 100% osseointegration rate versus a 25% osseointegration rate. The maximum and minimum principal stresses under inclined load are 1.3 ~ 1.7 and 1.4 ~ 1.8 times, respectively, those under vertical load. The stress on the jaw bone did not exceed the threshold when the osseointegration rate was ≥ 50% for Type II and 100% for Type III. High strain zones are found in cancellous bone, and the maximum strain increases as the bone condition deteriorate and the rate of osseointegration decreases. The maximum stress in the jaw bone increases as the bone condition deteriorates and the osseointegration rate increases. Increased osseointegration rate reduces cancellous bone strain and improves implant stability without exceeding the yield strength of the cortical bone. When the bone condition is good, and the osseointegration ratio is relatively high, 6 mm short implants can be used. In clinical practice, incline loading is an unfavorable loading condition, and axial loading should be used as much as possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6831</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6831</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37061667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anisotropy ; Biomechanics ; Bone condition ; Bone implants ; Bones ; Boundary conditions ; Cancellous bone ; Computer Simulation ; Cortical bone ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Finite Element Analysis ; Finite element method ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Implant dentures ; Jaw ; Measurement ; Mechanical loading ; Neck ; Osseointegration ; Osseointegration rate ; Shear stress ; Short implants ; Strain gauges ; Strains and stresses ; Stress relaxation (Materials) ; Stress relieving (Materials) ; Stress, Mechanical ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>BMC oral health, 2023-04, Vol.23 (1), p.220-220, Article 220</ispartof><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10105927/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2803006365?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061667$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Mingfa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Lailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Lang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><title>Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates</title><title>BMC oral health</title><addtitle>BMC Oral Health</addtitle><description>This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of bone conditions and osseointegration rates on the stress distribution of short implants using finite element analysis and also to provide some reference for the application of short implants from a biomechanical prospect. Anisotropic jaw bone models with three bone conditions and 4.1 × 6 mm implant models were created, and four osseointegration rates were simulated. Stress and strain for the implants and jaws were calculated during vertical or oblique loading. The cortical bone area around the implant neck was most stressed. The maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone increased with bone deterioration and osseointegration rate, with maximum values of 144.32 MPa and 203.94 MPa for vertical and inclined loading, respectively. The osseointegration rate had the greatest effect on the maximum principal stress in cortical bone of type III bone, with its value increasing by 63.8% at a 100% osseointegration rate versus a 25% osseointegration rate. The maximum and minimum principal stresses under inclined load are 1.3 ~ 1.7 and 1.4 ~ 1.8 times, respectively, those under vertical load. The stress on the jaw bone did not exceed the threshold when the osseointegration rate was ≥ 50% for Type II and 100% for Type III. High strain zones are found in cancellous bone, and the maximum strain increases as the bone condition deteriorate and the rate of osseointegration decreases. The maximum stress in the jaw bone increases as the bone condition deteriorates and the osseointegration rate increases. Increased osseointegration rate reduces cancellous bone strain and improves implant stability without exceeding the yield strength of the cortical bone. When the bone condition is good, and the osseointegration ratio is relatively high, 6 mm short implants can be used. In clinical practice, incline loading is an unfavorable loading condition, and axial loading should be used as much as possible.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Bone condition</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Cancellous bone</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Cortical bone</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Finite Element Analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implant dentures</subject><subject>Jaw</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Mechanical loading</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Osseointegration rate</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Short implants</subject><subject>Strain gauges</subject><subject>Strains and stresses</subject><subject>Stress relaxation (Materials)</subject><subject>Stress relieving (Materials)</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1472-6831</issn><issn>1472-6831</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4IAiceGSMo5jOz6hquKjUiUu5Ww59njXq2xc7Cyo_4EfzWS3lC5CjmXr5b03Gs-rqtcMzhnr5fvCWg28gXbZuhONflKdsk61jew5e_roflK9KGUDwFTfdc-rE65AMinVafXrZp0RGx-3OJWYJjvWIU5xxhpHJGyuLWF3JZY6hbrMGUupfaRLHHYzCWr6yjrluY7b29FOc6l_xnlNnBAwLwZDmrB2afJx4Rcy9HUqBVOcZlxlu3ehA8vL6lmwY8FX9-dZ9e3Tx5vLL831189XlxfXjROymxtlQUhnBwTOmWYAvQ2hVwPBXLDeWycl6t57GQA67sQgXCescsq3rtOBn1VXB1-f7Mbc5ri1-c4kG80eSHllbJ6jG9H40AoJTnvgvhOtHlzfQeBUnrdOc0deHw5et7thi95Rx9mOR6bHf6a4Nqv0wzBgIHSryOHdvUNO33dYZrONxeFIj4lpV0zbA9NKApNEffsPdZN2mQa0Z3EAyaX4y1pZ6iBOIVFht5iaC9WJHrSCpez5f1i0PG4jjQtDJPxI0B4ELtP4MoaHJhmYJZDmEEhDgTT7QBpNojePn-dB8ieB_DdU195K</recordid><startdate>20230415</startdate><enddate>20230415</enddate><creator>Yang, Yunhe</creator><creator>Liu, Yuchen</creator><creator>Yuan, Xi</creator><creator>Ren, Mingfa</creator><creator>Chen, Xiaodong</creator><creator>Luo, Lailong</creator><creator>Zheng, Lang</creator><creator>Liu, Yang</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230415</creationdate><title>Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates</title><author>Yang, Yunhe ; Liu, Yuchen ; Yuan, Xi ; Ren, Mingfa ; Chen, Xiaodong ; Luo, Lailong ; Zheng, Lang ; Liu, Yang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Bone condition</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Cancellous bone</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Cortical bone</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Finite Element Analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implant dentures</topic><topic>Jaw</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Mechanical loading</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Osseointegration rate</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Short implants</topic><topic>Strain gauges</topic><topic>Strains and stresses</topic><topic>Stress relaxation (Materials)</topic><topic>Stress relieving (Materials)</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yuchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Mingfa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xiaodong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Lailong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Lang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Yang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC oral health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Yunhe</au><au>Liu, Yuchen</au><au>Yuan, Xi</au><au>Ren, Mingfa</au><au>Chen, Xiaodong</au><au>Luo, Lailong</au><au>Zheng, Lang</au><au>Liu, Yang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates</atitle><jtitle>BMC oral health</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Oral Health</addtitle><date>2023-04-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>220</spage><epage>220</epage><pages>220-220</pages><artnum>220</artnum><issn>1472-6831</issn><eissn>1472-6831</eissn><abstract>This experiment aimed to investigate the effects of bone conditions and osseointegration rates on the stress distribution of short implants using finite element analysis and also to provide some reference for the application of short implants from a biomechanical prospect. Anisotropic jaw bone models with three bone conditions and 4.1 × 6 mm implant models were created, and four osseointegration rates were simulated. Stress and strain for the implants and jaws were calculated during vertical or oblique loading. The cortical bone area around the implant neck was most stressed. The maximum von Mises stress in cortical bone increased with bone deterioration and osseointegration rate, with maximum values of 144.32 MPa and 203.94 MPa for vertical and inclined loading, respectively. The osseointegration rate had the greatest effect on the maximum principal stress in cortical bone of type III bone, with its value increasing by 63.8% at a 100% osseointegration rate versus a 25% osseointegration rate. The maximum and minimum principal stresses under inclined load are 1.3 ~ 1.7 and 1.4 ~ 1.8 times, respectively, those under vertical load. The stress on the jaw bone did not exceed the threshold when the osseointegration rate was ≥ 50% for Type II and 100% for Type III. High strain zones are found in cancellous bone, and the maximum strain increases as the bone condition deteriorate and the rate of osseointegration decreases. The maximum stress in the jaw bone increases as the bone condition deteriorates and the osseointegration rate increases. Increased osseointegration rate reduces cancellous bone strain and improves implant stability without exceeding the yield strength of the cortical bone. When the bone condition is good, and the osseointegration ratio is relatively high, 6 mm short implants can be used. In clinical practice, incline loading is an unfavorable loading condition, and axial loading should be used as much as possible.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>37061667</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6831
ispartof BMC oral health, 2023-04, Vol.23 (1), p.220-220, Article 220
issn 1472-6831
1472-6831
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_df2560c9d03d4529bc840f36ca32c93c
source Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PubMed Central
subjects Analysis
Anisotropy
Biomechanics
Bone condition
Bone implants
Bones
Boundary conditions
Cancellous bone
Computer Simulation
Cortical bone
Dental Implants
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Stress Analysis - methods
Finite Element Analysis
Finite element method
Health aspects
Humans
Implant dentures
Jaw
Measurement
Mechanical loading
Neck
Osseointegration
Osseointegration rate
Shear stress
Short implants
Strain gauges
Strains and stresses
Stress relaxation (Materials)
Stress relieving (Materials)
Stress, Mechanical
Transplants & implants
title Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution on short implants with different bone conditions and osseointegration rates
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A58%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three-dimensional%20finite%20element%20analysis%20of%20stress%20distribution%20on%20short%20implants%20with%20different%20bone%20conditions%20and%20osseointegration%20rates&rft.jtitle=BMC%20oral%20health&rft.au=Yang,%20Yunhe&rft.date=2023-04-15&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=220&rft.epage=220&rft.pages=220-220&rft.artnum=220&rft.issn=1472-6831&rft.eissn=1472-6831&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12903-023-02945-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA745809707%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c564t-7a056cabe033191008aff87ba053518dac66e98dd6f0043c5b5c45a7c7d2c49f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2803006365&rft_id=info:pmid/37061667&rft_galeid=A745809707&rfr_iscdi=true