Correlation between general quality of life and oral health related quality in the mixed dentition

• Published in: Brazilian oral research 2024-01, Vol.38, p.e039
• Main Authors: Carneiro, Diego Patrik Alves, Santos, Grazielle Araújo Dos, Moraes, Caroline Nogueira de, Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro, Vedovello, Silvia Amélia Scudeler
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Child; Children; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dental Caries - psychology; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE; Dentition, Mixed; Female; Humans; Male; Malocclusion - psychology; Oral health; Oral Health - statistics & numerical data; Original Research/Community Dental Health; Quality of Life; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Socioeconomic Factors; Statistics, Nonparametric; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107; 1807-3107
• DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0039

The aim of this study was to evaluate the convergence between the domains of the Autoquestionnaire Qualité de Vie Enfant image (AUQUEI) and the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10) in the mixed dentition. A sample of 676 children aged 8 to 10 years responded to the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) questionnaires using the AUQUEI and the CPQ8-10, respectively. Clinical (dental caries and malocclusion) and socioeconomic variables were assessed. The validity of convergence between scores (total and per domain) of the two instruments was assessed by Spearman correlation analysis, considering that non-zero coefficient values represented a correlation between scores. The median was calculated to compare the scores of each questionnaire relative to the variables, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test was applied to determine statistically significant differences between the categories. A weak significant correlation (between 0.30 and 0.50) was observed between the domains and the total scores of instruments (p < 0.05), except for the leisure domain (p > 0.05). Participants with a lower family income had worse HRQoL (p < 0.05), and those with caries and malocclusion experience had worse OHRQoL (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the AUQUEI and CPQ8-10 instruments showed a weak correlation. Income and clinical variables had a negative impact on the AUQUEI and CPQ8-10, respectively.