Loading…

Capital-income breeding in wild boar: a comparison between two sexes

Organisms differ in the strategy adopted to fuel reproduction by using resources either previously acquired and stored in body reserves (capital breeding) or, conversely, acquired during their reproductive activity (income breeding). The choice of one or the other strategy is related to several inte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports 2021-02, Vol.11 (1), p.4579-4579, Article 4579
Main Authors: Brogi, Rudy, Chirichella, Roberta, Brivio, Francesca, Merli, Enrico, Bottero, Elisa, Apollonio, Marco
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523
container_end_page 4579
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4579
container_title Scientific reports
container_volume 11
creator Brogi, Rudy
Chirichella, Roberta
Brivio, Francesca
Merli, Enrico
Bottero, Elisa
Apollonio, Marco
description Organisms differ in the strategy adopted to fuel reproduction by using resources either previously acquired and stored in body reserves (capital breeding) or, conversely, acquired during their reproductive activity (income breeding). The choice of one or the other strategy is related to several internal and external factors which are counteractive in wild boar. Based on a large dataset of culled wild boar, we investigated individual body weight variability throughout the period of 1st September–31st January, which included the main part of the mating season, among different sex and age classes to determine their position along the capital-income breeding continuum. Though food resources were abundant during the rut, adult males lost body weight suggesting they adopted a predominantly capital breeding strategy, likely owing to the high intra-sexual competition entailed by the peculiar mating system of the species. On the contrary, subadult males seemed to behave as income breeders, likely enhancing the reproductive flexibility of wild boar populations. During the rut, females stored reserves, thus suggesting that they substantially relied on them to cover future reproductive costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41598-021-84035-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e0abf54e75c64c78b79bca1dd0ab1aad</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e0abf54e75c64c78b79bca1dd0ab1aad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2493257323</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EotXQP8ACRWLDJuBnnLBAQsOrUiU2sLau7TuDRxl7sDME_j2eppSWBd7Yuufcz_Y9hDxl9CWjon9VJFND31LO2l5Sodr5ATnnVKqWC84f3jmfkYtSdrQuxQfJhsfkTIhOCKb1OXm3hkOYYGxDdGmPjc2IPsRtE2Izh9E3NkF-3UBT1QPkUFJsLE4zYmymOTUFf2J5Qh5tYCx4cbOvyNcP77-sP7VXnz9ert9etU5JOrXeyb6jSjip-4EyyhjTXkqqFO8GD84LQa0HaSXT0lPHNHSWo3Ois1IoLlbkcuH6BDtzyGEP-ZdJEMx1IeWtgTwFN6JBCnajJGrlOul0b_VgHTDva50B-Mp6s7AOR7tH7zBOGcZ70PtKDN_MNv0weqBaKF0BL24AOX0_YpnMPhSH4wgR07EYLgfJ9dDXSa_I83-su3TMsY7q5BK80vjJxReXy6mUjJvbxzBqTpmbJXNTMzfXmZu5Nj27-43blj8JV4NYDKVKcYv5793_wf4GLZi3Eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2493257323</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Capital-income breeding in wild boar: a comparison between two sexes</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Brogi, Rudy ; Chirichella, Roberta ; Brivio, Francesca ; Merli, Enrico ; Bottero, Elisa ; Apollonio, Marco</creator><creatorcontrib>Brogi, Rudy ; Chirichella, Roberta ; Brivio, Francesca ; Merli, Enrico ; Bottero, Elisa ; Apollonio, Marco</creatorcontrib><description>Organisms differ in the strategy adopted to fuel reproduction by using resources either previously acquired and stored in body reserves (capital breeding) or, conversely, acquired during their reproductive activity (income breeding). The choice of one or the other strategy is related to several internal and external factors which are counteractive in wild boar. Based on a large dataset of culled wild boar, we investigated individual body weight variability throughout the period of 1st September–31st January, which included the main part of the mating season, among different sex and age classes to determine their position along the capital-income breeding continuum. Though food resources were abundant during the rut, adult males lost body weight suggesting they adopted a predominantly capital breeding strategy, likely owing to the high intra-sexual competition entailed by the peculiar mating system of the species. On the contrary, subadult males seemed to behave as income breeders, likely enhancing the reproductive flexibility of wild boar populations. During the rut, females stored reserves, thus suggesting that they substantially relied on them to cover future reproductive costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-2322</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84035-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33633177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>631/158 ; 631/181 ; 631/601 ; Age ; Animal behavior ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Animals, Wild - physiology ; Body weight ; Breeding ; Competition ; Costs ; Female ; Females ; Food resources ; Growth models ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Income ; Male ; Males ; Metabolism ; multidisciplinary ; Reproduction ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary) ; Seasons ; Sex Factors ; Sexes ; Sus scrofa ; Swine - physiology</subject><ispartof>Scientific reports, 2021-02, Vol.11 (1), p.4579-4579, Article 4579</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2493257323/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2493257323?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33633177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brogi, Rudy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirichella, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brivio, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merli, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottero, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apollonio, Marco</creatorcontrib><title>Capital-income breeding in wild boar: a comparison between two sexes</title><title>Scientific reports</title><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><description>Organisms differ in the strategy adopted to fuel reproduction by using resources either previously acquired and stored in body reserves (capital breeding) or, conversely, acquired during their reproductive activity (income breeding). The choice of one or the other strategy is related to several internal and external factors which are counteractive in wild boar. Based on a large dataset of culled wild boar, we investigated individual body weight variability throughout the period of 1st September–31st January, which included the main part of the mating season, among different sex and age classes to determine their position along the capital-income breeding continuum. Though food resources were abundant during the rut, adult males lost body weight suggesting they adopted a predominantly capital breeding strategy, likely owing to the high intra-sexual competition entailed by the peculiar mating system of the species. On the contrary, subadult males seemed to behave as income breeders, likely enhancing the reproductive flexibility of wild boar populations. During the rut, females stored reserves, thus suggesting that they substantially relied on them to cover future reproductive costs.</description><subject>631/158</subject><subject>631/181</subject><subject>631/601</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild - physiology</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food resources</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Swine - physiology</subject><issn>2045-2322</issn><issn>2045-2322</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv1DAUhS0EotXQP8ACRWLDJuBnnLBAQsOrUiU2sLau7TuDRxl7sDME_j2eppSWBd7Yuufcz_Y9hDxl9CWjon9VJFND31LO2l5Sodr5ATnnVKqWC84f3jmfkYtSdrQuxQfJhsfkTIhOCKb1OXm3hkOYYGxDdGmPjc2IPsRtE2Izh9E3NkF-3UBT1QPkUFJsLE4zYmymOTUFf2J5Qh5tYCx4cbOvyNcP77-sP7VXnz9ert9etU5JOrXeyb6jSjip-4EyyhjTXkqqFO8GD84LQa0HaSXT0lPHNHSWo3Ois1IoLlbkcuH6BDtzyGEP-ZdJEMx1IeWtgTwFN6JBCnajJGrlOul0b_VgHTDva50B-Mp6s7AOR7tH7zBOGcZ70PtKDN_MNv0weqBaKF0BL24AOX0_YpnMPhSH4wgR07EYLgfJ9dDXSa_I83-su3TMsY7q5BK80vjJxReXy6mUjJvbxzBqTpmbJXNTMzfXmZu5Nj27-43blj8JV4NYDKVKcYv5793_wf4GLZi3Eg</recordid><startdate>20210225</startdate><enddate>20210225</enddate><creator>Brogi, Rudy</creator><creator>Chirichella, Roberta</creator><creator>Brivio, Francesca</creator><creator>Merli, Enrico</creator><creator>Bottero, Elisa</creator><creator>Apollonio, Marco</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210225</creationdate><title>Capital-income breeding in wild boar: a comparison between two sexes</title><author>Brogi, Rudy ; Chirichella, Roberta ; Brivio, Francesca ; Merli, Enrico ; Bottero, Elisa ; Apollonio, Marco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>631/158</topic><topic>631/181</topic><topic>631/601</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild - physiology</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food resources</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Swine - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brogi, Rudy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chirichella, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brivio, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merli, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottero, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apollonio, Marco</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brogi, Rudy</au><au>Chirichella, Roberta</au><au>Brivio, Francesca</au><au>Merli, Enrico</au><au>Bottero, Elisa</au><au>Apollonio, Marco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Capital-income breeding in wild boar: a comparison between two sexes</atitle><jtitle>Scientific reports</jtitle><stitle>Sci Rep</stitle><addtitle>Sci Rep</addtitle><date>2021-02-25</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4579</spage><epage>4579</epage><pages>4579-4579</pages><artnum>4579</artnum><issn>2045-2322</issn><eissn>2045-2322</eissn><abstract>Organisms differ in the strategy adopted to fuel reproduction by using resources either previously acquired and stored in body reserves (capital breeding) or, conversely, acquired during their reproductive activity (income breeding). The choice of one or the other strategy is related to several internal and external factors which are counteractive in wild boar. Based on a large dataset of culled wild boar, we investigated individual body weight variability throughout the period of 1st September–31st January, which included the main part of the mating season, among different sex and age classes to determine their position along the capital-income breeding continuum. Though food resources were abundant during the rut, adult males lost body weight suggesting they adopted a predominantly capital breeding strategy, likely owing to the high intra-sexual competition entailed by the peculiar mating system of the species. On the contrary, subadult males seemed to behave as income breeders, likely enhancing the reproductive flexibility of wild boar populations. During the rut, females stored reserves, thus suggesting that they substantially relied on them to cover future reproductive costs.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>33633177</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41598-021-84035-w</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2045-2322
ispartof Scientific reports, 2021-02, Vol.11 (1), p.4579-4579, Article 4579
issn 2045-2322
2045-2322
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e0abf54e75c64c78b79bca1dd0ab1aad
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
subjects 631/158
631/181
631/601
Age
Animal behavior
Animal reproduction
Animals
Animals, Wild - physiology
Body weight
Breeding
Competition
Costs
Female
Females
Food resources
Growth models
Humanities and Social Sciences
Income
Male
Males
Metabolism
multidisciplinary
Reproduction
Science
Science (multidisciplinary)
Seasons
Sex Factors
Sexes
Sus scrofa
Swine - physiology
title Capital-income breeding in wild boar: a comparison between two sexes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T20%3A31%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Capital-income%20breeding%20in%20wild%20boar:%20a%20comparison%20between%20two%20sexes&rft.jtitle=Scientific%20reports&rft.au=Brogi,%20Rudy&rft.date=2021-02-25&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4579&rft.epage=4579&rft.pages=4579-4579&rft.artnum=4579&rft.issn=2045-2322&rft.eissn=2045-2322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41598-021-84035-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2493257323%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-dc486053c47890101117d44055269dacd330bda4b4174d0c17a6b2ecc36b43523%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2493257323&rft_id=info:pmid/33633177&rfr_iscdi=true