To what extent did implementing a community-embedded intervention align with the goals and roles of stakeholders in adolescent sexual and reproductive health?

• Published in: Reproductive health 2024-02, Vol.21 (1), p.27-27, Article 27
• Main Authors: Ekwueme, Chinazom N, Okeke, Chinyere, Eze, Irene Ifeyinwa, Mbachu, Chinyere Ojiugo, Onwujekwe, Obinna
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acceptability; Adolescent; Alignment; Burden; Community; Community health aides; Education; Health services; Intervention; Local government; Management; Opportunity cost; Opportunity costs; Practice; Pregnancy; Reproductive health; Sexual and reproductive health; Sexual behavior; Sexuality; Sexually transmitted diseases; STD; Success; Supervision; Sustainability; Teenagers; Young adults
• ISSN: 1742-4755; 1742-4755
• DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01753-w

Adolescents' sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs are largely unmet due to poor access to SRH information and services. A multicomponent community-embedded intervention, comprising advocacy to policymakers and community leaders, training of health workers on the provision of youth-friendly SRH services, and establishment of school health clubs, was implemented in Ebonyi State, Nigeria, to improve access to SRH information and services for adolescents aged 13-18 years in selected communities and secondary schools. This study explored the extent to which the intervention aligned with goals and roles of stakeholders in the State. Qualitative in-depth interviews (30) were conducted with key stakeholders in adolescent health programming in the State, and community gatekeepers (traditional and religious leaders) in the intervention communities. Sex-disaggregated focus group discussions (10) were conducted with health service providers, parents/guardians of adolescents. Data was analyzed deductively based on fit of strategy and two constructs of the Theoretical Framework for Acceptability - burden, and opportunity cost. The transcripts were coded in NVivo 12, and the subthemes that emerged from each construct were identified. Stakeholders perceived the ASRH intervention activities to align with their individual goals of sense of purpose from serving the community and organizational goals of improving the visibility of adolescent reproductive health programs and aligned with their routine work. Hence, implementing or participating in the interventions was not considered a burden by many. Although the delivery of the interventions constituted additional workload and time commitment for the implementers, the benefits of partaking in the intervention were perceived to outweigh the inputs that they were required to make. Some of the community health workers in the intervention felt that provision of financial incentive will help with making the intervention less burdensome. To participate in the intervention, opportunity cost included forgoing work and business activities as well as family commitments. Findings from the study show that the intervention aligned with individual/organizational goals of stakeholders. To improve acceptability of the ASRH interventions, interventions should leverage on existing programs and routine work of people who will deliver the interventions.