Loading…

The evaluation of levosimendan in patients with acute myocardial infarction related ventricular septal rupture undergoing cardiac surgery: a prospective observational cohort study with propensity score analysis

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of levosimendan in patients with acute myocardial infarction related ventricular septal rupture (AMI-VSR) underwent cardiac surgery. Prospective observational cohort study with propensity score analysis. There were 261 patients with AMI-V...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC anesthesiology 2022-05, Vol.22 (1), p.135-135, Article 135
Main Authors: Li, Ze-Shi, Wang, Kuo, Pan, Tuo, Sun, Yan-Hua, Liu, Chang, Cheng, Yong-Qing, Zhang, He, Zhang, Hai-Tao, Wang, Dong-Jin, Chen, Zu-Jun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of levosimendan in patients with acute myocardial infarction related ventricular septal rupture (AMI-VSR) underwent cardiac surgery. Prospective observational cohort study with propensity score analysis. There were 261 patients with AMI-VSR in our study. After 1:1 propensity matching, 106 patients (53 levosimendan and 53 control) were selected in the matched cohort. None. Patients who received levosimendan were assigned to the levosimendan group (n = 164). The patients who were not received were levosimendan assigned to the control group (n = 97). The levosimendan was initiated immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass. Then, it has been maintained during the postoperative 3 days. The poor outcomes were identified as follows: death and postoperative complications (postoperative stroke, low cardiac output syndromeneeded mechanical circulatory support after surgery, acute kidney injury (≥ stage III), postoperative infection or septic shock, new developed atrial fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmias). Before matching, the control group had more length of ICU stay (6.69 ± 3.90 d vs. 5.20 ± 2.24 d, p 
ISSN:1471-2253
1471-2253
DOI:10.1186/s12871-022-01663-z