Loading…
Genetic detection of Resistance Genes among Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter spp. isolates
Internationally, there is an increasing prevalence of diseases caused by germs that are resistant to many drugs, which is often a reason for worry. The objective of the present investigation was to identify specific genes linked to the resistance of beta-lactam, macrolide, and sulfa medications in E...
Saved in:
Published in: | BIO web of conferences 2024, Vol.139, p.6029 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Internationally, there is an increasing prevalence of diseases caused by germs that are resistant to many drugs, which is often a reason for worry. The objective of the present investigation was to identify specific genes linked to the resistance of beta-lactam, macrolide, and sulfa medications in Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter spp. isolates. A total of 364 patients were included in the study, with 132 (36.26%) being male and 232 (63.74%) being female. The results indicated that 135 samples, accounting for 37.08% of the total, exhibited positive bacterial growth. The findings indicated that Enterobacter cloacae was present in 25 (6.86%) of the patients with urinary tract infections, whereas Citrobacter spp. was found in only 2 (0.54%) cases (consisting of 1 (0.27%) C. freundii isolate and 1 (0.27%) C. farmer isolate). The PCR findings indicated that the sul-1 gene was present in 23 out of 25 (92%) E. cloacae isolates and in 2 out of 2 (100%) Citrobacter spp. isolates. On the other hand, the sul-2 gene was detected in 22 out of 25 (88%) E. cloacae isolates and in 2 out of 2 (100%) Citrobacter spp. isolates. The mph(A) gene was present in 80% (20/25) of E. cloacae isolates and in 100% (2/2) of Citrobacter spp. isolates. The findings showed that 96% of the E. cloacae isolates and 100% of the Citrobacter spp. isolates tested positive for both ctx-m and ctx-m-10 genes. The prevalence of the veb gene in E. cloacae isolates was 76% (19/25), but in Citrobacter spp. isolates it was 100% (2/2). The investigation did not detect the gene ctx-m-14 in any of the local isolates examined. Genes of sul-3 and ctx-m-14 were no recorded in this study. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2117-4458 2117-4458 |
DOI: | 10.1051/bioconf/202413906029 |