Loading…

Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis

Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2024-12, Vol.25 (1), p.1009-6, Article 1009
Main Authors: Elkabbani, Mohamed, Saied, Ahmed Mostafa, Abouelnas, Bassam Ali, Dragos, Apostu, Osman, Amr, Tarabichi, Samih
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bfe0fedc4f15582815362b98830c21a311f6f0a78398475fcc3b52a0bd84f7ad3
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1009
container_title BMC musculoskeletal disorders
container_volume 25
creator Elkabbani, Mohamed
Saied, Ahmed Mostafa
Abouelnas, Bassam Ali
Dragos, Apostu
Osman, Amr
Tarabichi, Samih
description Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two of the most commonly used techniques, that is the use of self-alignment during passive range of motion (free-floating technique) versus the anterior cortex referencing method (Curve-on-curve technique). Twenty-eight consecutive patients with advanced varus-type osteoarthritis scheduled for posterior stabilized total knee replacement with symmetrical tibial baseplate were included in the study. We set the location of the tibial component trial using the method of self-alignment during passive range of motion and compared it to the location of the tibial component trial when referenced to the anterior cortex. The distance between the two locations was independently measured by two experienced surgeons. In all of the cases, the tibial component centre was located more laterally on the anterior tibial cortex in the anterior cortex referencing technique when compared to the self-alignment technique [range 3-19 mm]. The tibial components placed using the anterior referencing technique (Curve-on-curve technique) are more externally rotated as compared to those placed using the self-alignment technique (free-floating technique) in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties using symmetrical tibial components.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12891-024-07975-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1b25516b3b44abf8dae223991b0ddcb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A819742693</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e1b25516b3b44abf8dae223991b0ddcb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A819742693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bfe0fedc4f15582815362b98830c21a311f6f0a78398475fcc3b52a0bd84f7ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZsUnxL4qxQNeJSqRIbWFu2Y894SOzBdkYqz8kDcTJTyhSQF779_-dzjk9VvST4khDRvs2Eip7UmPIad33X1PhRdU54R2rKO_74ZH1WPct5izHpBOufVmesb1vBODuvfq7mtLd1DLVZFqhYswn--2yRz2iKyaJkR6_0CFcbFZBL1tZujKr4sD5Ru5hQ8dqrEZk47WKwoWS0i9kXH8Oi9WHZFps8SHNR2o_-hx1QiQVM34K1SKWySXE3qlxu0ZwXV76dJluSN6D5lw_MvUpzRgs4HuzwXn5ePXFqzPbF3XxRff3w_svqU33z-eP16uqmNpw3pdbOYmcHwx1pGkEFaVhLdS8Ew4YSxQhxrcNqqZngXeOMYbqhCutBcNepgV1U10fuENVW7pKfVLqVUXl5OIhpLSEmb0YrLdG0aUirmeZcaScGZSllfU80HgajgfXuyNrNeoKgIL-kxgfQhzfBb-Q67iUhLYRNCRDe3BFShC_JRU4-GzuOKtg4Z8kIb9uW9ZyB9PVf0m2cU4Bagaqhbd8xyv-o1goy8MFFeNgsUHklSN9xEC6sy_-oYAx28gY-ynk4f2CgR4NJMedk3X2SBMulseWxsSU0tjw0tsRgenVannvL705mvwCPwPrC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3152697324</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Elkabbani, Mohamed ; Saied, Ahmed Mostafa ; Abouelnas, Bassam Ali ; Dragos, Apostu ; Osman, Amr ; Tarabichi, Samih</creator><creatorcontrib>Elkabbani, Mohamed ; Saied, Ahmed Mostafa ; Abouelnas, Bassam Ali ; Dragos, Apostu ; Osman, Amr ; Tarabichi, Samih</creatorcontrib><description>Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two of the most commonly used techniques, that is the use of self-alignment during passive range of motion (free-floating technique) versus the anterior cortex referencing method (Curve-on-curve technique). Twenty-eight consecutive patients with advanced varus-type osteoarthritis scheduled for posterior stabilized total knee replacement with symmetrical tibial baseplate were included in the study. We set the location of the tibial component trial using the method of self-alignment during passive range of motion and compared it to the location of the tibial component trial when referenced to the anterior cortex. The distance between the two locations was independently measured by two experienced surgeons. In all of the cases, the tibial component centre was located more laterally on the anterior tibial cortex in the anterior cortex referencing technique when compared to the self-alignment technique [range 3-19 mm]. The tibial components placed using the anterior referencing technique (Curve-on-curve technique) are more externally rotated as compared to those placed using the self-alignment technique (free-floating technique) in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties using symmetrical tibial components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2474</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07975-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39668343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty (knee) ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Cortex ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Knee ; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging ; Knee Joint - physiopathology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Malrotation ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Pain ; Pain management ; Patients ; Polyethylene ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surgeons ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical techniques ; Tibia ; Tibia - surgery ; Tibial component rotation ; Total knee arthroplasty ; Transplants &amp; implants</subject><ispartof>BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024-12, Vol.25 (1), p.1009-6, Article 1009</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bfe0fedc4f15582815362b98830c21a311f6f0a78398475fcc3b52a0bd84f7ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11636221/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3152697324?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,25735,27906,27907,36994,36995,44572,53773,53775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39668343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elkabbani, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saied, Ahmed Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abouelnas, Bassam Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Apostu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarabichi, Samih</creatorcontrib><title>Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis</title><title>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</title><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><description>Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two of the most commonly used techniques, that is the use of self-alignment during passive range of motion (free-floating technique) versus the anterior cortex referencing method (Curve-on-curve technique). Twenty-eight consecutive patients with advanced varus-type osteoarthritis scheduled for posterior stabilized total knee replacement with symmetrical tibial baseplate were included in the study. We set the location of the tibial component trial using the method of self-alignment during passive range of motion and compared it to the location of the tibial component trial when referenced to the anterior cortex. The distance between the two locations was independently measured by two experienced surgeons. In all of the cases, the tibial component centre was located more laterally on the anterior tibial cortex in the anterior cortex referencing technique when compared to the self-alignment technique [range 3-19 mm]. The tibial components placed using the anterior referencing technique (Curve-on-curve technique) are more externally rotated as compared to those placed using the self-alignment technique (free-floating technique) in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties using symmetrical tibial components.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty (knee)</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Cortex</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malrotation</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Surgical techniques</subject><subject>Tibia</subject><subject>Tibia - surgery</subject><subject>Tibial component rotation</subject><subject>Total knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><issn>1471-2474</issn><issn>1471-2474</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkstu1DAUhiMEoqXwAiyQJTZsUnxL4qxQNeJSqRIbWFu2Y894SOzBdkYqz8kDcTJTyhSQF779_-dzjk9VvST4khDRvs2Eip7UmPIad33X1PhRdU54R2rKO_74ZH1WPct5izHpBOufVmesb1vBODuvfq7mtLd1DLVZFqhYswn--2yRz2iKyaJkR6_0CFcbFZBL1tZujKr4sD5Ru5hQ8dqrEZk47WKwoWS0i9kXH8Oi9WHZFps8SHNR2o_-hx1QiQVM34K1SKWySXE3qlxu0ZwXV76dJluSN6D5lw_MvUpzRgs4HuzwXn5ePXFqzPbF3XxRff3w_svqU33z-eP16uqmNpw3pdbOYmcHwx1pGkEFaVhLdS8Ew4YSxQhxrcNqqZngXeOMYbqhCutBcNepgV1U10fuENVW7pKfVLqVUXl5OIhpLSEmb0YrLdG0aUirmeZcaScGZSllfU80HgajgfXuyNrNeoKgIL-kxgfQhzfBb-Q67iUhLYRNCRDe3BFShC_JRU4-GzuOKtg4Z8kIb9uW9ZyB9PVf0m2cU4Bagaqhbd8xyv-o1goy8MFFeNgsUHklSN9xEC6sy_-oYAx28gY-ynk4f2CgR4NJMedk3X2SBMulseWxsSU0tjw0tsRgenVannvL705mvwCPwPrC</recordid><startdate>20241212</startdate><enddate>20241212</enddate><creator>Elkabbani, Mohamed</creator><creator>Saied, Ahmed Mostafa</creator><creator>Abouelnas, Bassam Ali</creator><creator>Dragos, Apostu</creator><creator>Osman, Amr</creator><creator>Tarabichi, Samih</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241212</creationdate><title>Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis</title><author>Elkabbani, Mohamed ; Saied, Ahmed Mostafa ; Abouelnas, Bassam Ali ; Dragos, Apostu ; Osman, Amr ; Tarabichi, Samih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bfe0fedc4f15582815362b98830c21a311f6f0a78398475fcc3b52a0bd84f7ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty (knee)</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Cortex</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malrotation</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Surgical techniques</topic><topic>Tibia</topic><topic>Tibia - surgery</topic><topic>Tibial component rotation</topic><topic>Total knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elkabbani, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saied, Ahmed Mostafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abouelnas, Bassam Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dragos, Apostu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osman, Amr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarabichi, Samih</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elkabbani, Mohamed</au><au>Saied, Ahmed Mostafa</au><au>Abouelnas, Bassam Ali</au><au>Dragos, Apostu</au><au>Osman, Amr</au><au>Tarabichi, Samih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis</atitle><jtitle>BMC musculoskeletal disorders</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Musculoskelet Disord</addtitle><date>2024-12-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1009</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1009-6</pages><artnum>1009</artnum><issn>1471-2474</issn><eissn>1471-2474</eissn><abstract>Malrotation of the tibial components in total knee arthroplasties is a common cause of pain and functional impairment. There are multiple methods used to establish the tibial component rotation, but there is still no consensus which method is the best.The objective of this study was to compare two of the most commonly used techniques, that is the use of self-alignment during passive range of motion (free-floating technique) versus the anterior cortex referencing method (Curve-on-curve technique). Twenty-eight consecutive patients with advanced varus-type osteoarthritis scheduled for posterior stabilized total knee replacement with symmetrical tibial baseplate were included in the study. We set the location of the tibial component trial using the method of self-alignment during passive range of motion and compared it to the location of the tibial component trial when referenced to the anterior cortex. The distance between the two locations was independently measured by two experienced surgeons. In all of the cases, the tibial component centre was located more laterally on the anterior tibial cortex in the anterior cortex referencing technique when compared to the self-alignment technique [range 3-19 mm]. The tibial components placed using the anterior referencing technique (Curve-on-curve technique) are more externally rotated as compared to those placed using the self-alignment technique (free-floating technique) in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties using symmetrical tibial components.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>39668343</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12891-024-07975-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2474
ispartof BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024-12, Vol.25 (1), p.1009-6, Article 1009
issn 1471-2474
1471-2474
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1b25516b3b44abf8dae223991b0ddcb
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty (knee)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Cortex
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Malrotation
Methods
Middle Aged
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery
Pain
Pain management
Patients
Polyethylene
Range of motion
Range of Motion, Articular
Reproducibility of Results
Surgeons
Surgical outcomes
Surgical techniques
Tibia
Tibia - surgery
Tibial component rotation
Total knee arthroplasty
Transplants & implants
title Curve-on-curve technique is more reliable than free-floating technique for tibial components positioning in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using symmetrical tibial components in varus osteoarthritis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A56%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Curve-on-curve%20technique%20is%20more%20reliable%20than%20free-floating%20technique%20for%20tibial%20components%20positioning%20in%20posterior%20stabilized%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty%20using%20symmetrical%20tibial%20components%20in%20varus%20osteoarthritis&rft.jtitle=BMC%20musculoskeletal%20disorders&rft.au=Elkabbani,%20Mohamed&rft.date=2024-12-12&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1009&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1009-6&rft.artnum=1009&rft.issn=1471-2474&rft.eissn=1471-2474&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12891-024-07975-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA819742693%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-bfe0fedc4f15582815362b98830c21a311f6f0a78398475fcc3b52a0bd84f7ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3152697324&rft_id=info:pmid/39668343&rft_galeid=A819742693&rfr_iscdi=true