Loading…

Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition

This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energies (Basel) 2022-01, Vol.15 (2), p.499
Main Authors: Ngo, Duc-Vu, Kim, Young-Jin, Kim, Dong-Hyawn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 499
container_title Energies (Basel)
container_volume 15
creator Ngo, Duc-Vu
Kim, Young-Jin
Kim, Dong-Hyawn
description This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/en15020499
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1c969f9b4c84842a9142936f029aa27</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e1c969f9b4c84842a9142936f029aa27</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2621282606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9LxDAQxYsoKOrFTxDwJlTzp02Toy6uCuIeVvEY0nRGs3ab3aQV9tvbdUWdywyPH29meFl2xuilEJpeQcdKymmh9V52xLSWOaOV2P83H2anKS3oWEIwIcRRtp6DT0vvyDTaN9_6fkOuU4KUltD1JCCx5Cl8Qkvmg-t96MjN4D6gJ9MwdI39VjBEMkNM7yECefVdQ56HWPsOyIhAJHMXhkgmoWv8lj_JDtC2CU5_-nH2Mr19ntznj7O7h8n1Y-6EZH2uGJROIqha1ci40spprBiWktMaFEfpUIJUSB1XtChVUSFUqkHnKOUOxHH2sPNtgl2YVfRLGzcmWG--hRDfjI29dy0YYE5LjbounCpUwa1mBddCIuXaWl6NXuc7r1UM6wFSbxbjT914vuGSj9dxSeVIXewoF0NKEfB3K6Nmm5D5S0h8AcvagxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621282606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Ngo, Duc-Vu ; Kim, Young-Jin ; Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Duc-Vu ; Kim, Young-Jin ; Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creatorcontrib><description>This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15020499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Buckets ; Commercialization ; Construction costs ; Design ; Dynamic response ; Earthquakes ; Environmental conditions ; Fragility ; fragility curve ; Ocean floor ; Offshore ; Offshore energy sources ; Offshore operations ; offshore wind turbine (OWT) ; scour ; Sea level ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Seismic stability ; shallow muddy seabed ; Suction ; suction bucket (SB) ; Turbines ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.15 (2), p.499</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-0881-0114 ; 0000-0003-0626-0447</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621282606/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621282606?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Duc-Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.</description><subject>Buckets</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>fragility curve</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Offshore energy sources</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>offshore wind turbine (OWT)</subject><subject>scour</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic stability</subject><subject>shallow muddy seabed</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>suction bucket (SB)</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9LxDAQxYsoKOrFTxDwJlTzp02Toy6uCuIeVvEY0nRGs3ab3aQV9tvbdUWdywyPH29meFl2xuilEJpeQcdKymmh9V52xLSWOaOV2P83H2anKS3oWEIwIcRRtp6DT0vvyDTaN9_6fkOuU4KUltD1JCCx5Cl8Qkvmg-t96MjN4D6gJ9MwdI39VjBEMkNM7yECefVdQ56HWPsOyIhAJHMXhkgmoWv8lj_JDtC2CU5_-nH2Mr19ntznj7O7h8n1Y-6EZH2uGJROIqha1ci40spprBiWktMaFEfpUIJUSB1XtChVUSFUqkHnKOUOxHH2sPNtgl2YVfRLGzcmWG--hRDfjI29dy0YYE5LjbounCpUwa1mBddCIuXaWl6NXuc7r1UM6wFSbxbjT914vuGSj9dxSeVIXewoF0NKEfB3K6Nmm5D5S0h8AcvagxA</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Ngo, Duc-Vu</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0881-0114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0447</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</title><author>Ngo, Duc-Vu ; Kim, Young-Jin ; Kim, Dong-Hyawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Buckets</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>fragility curve</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Offshore energy sources</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>offshore wind turbine (OWT)</topic><topic>scour</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic stability</topic><topic>shallow muddy seabed</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>suction bucket (SB)</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Duc-Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngo, Duc-Vu</au><au>Kim, Young-Jin</au><au>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>499</spage><pages>499-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en15020499</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0881-0114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0447</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1996-1073
ispartof Energies (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.15 (2), p.499
issn 1996-1073
1996-1073
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1c969f9b4c84842a9142936f029aa27
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Buckets
Commercialization
Construction costs
Design
Dynamic response
Earthquakes
Environmental conditions
Fragility
fragility curve
Ocean floor
Offshore
Offshore energy sources
Offshore operations
offshore wind turbine (OWT)
scour
Sea level
Seismic activity
Seismic response
Seismic stability
shallow muddy seabed
Suction
suction bucket (SB)
Turbines
Wind power
title Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20Fragility%20Assessment%20of%20a%20Novel%20Suction%20Bucket%20Foundation%20for%20Offshore%20Wind%20Turbine%20under%20Scour%20Condition&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Ngo,%20Duc-Vu&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=499&rft.pages=499-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en15020499&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2621282606%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621282606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true