Loading…
Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition
This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energies (Basel) 2022-01, Vol.15 (2), p.499 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 499 |
container_title | Energies (Basel) |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Ngo, Duc-Vu Kim, Young-Jin Kim, Dong-Hyawn |
description | This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/en15020499 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1c969f9b4c84842a9142936f029aa27</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e1c969f9b4c84842a9142936f029aa27</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2621282606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU9LxDAQxYsoKOrFTxDwJlTzp02Toy6uCuIeVvEY0nRGs3ab3aQV9tvbdUWdywyPH29meFl2xuilEJpeQcdKymmh9V52xLSWOaOV2P83H2anKS3oWEIwIcRRtp6DT0vvyDTaN9_6fkOuU4KUltD1JCCx5Cl8Qkvmg-t96MjN4D6gJ9MwdI39VjBEMkNM7yECefVdQ56HWPsOyIhAJHMXhkgmoWv8lj_JDtC2CU5_-nH2Mr19ntznj7O7h8n1Y-6EZH2uGJROIqha1ci40spprBiWktMaFEfpUIJUSB1XtChVUSFUqkHnKOUOxHH2sPNtgl2YVfRLGzcmWG--hRDfjI29dy0YYE5LjbounCpUwa1mBddCIuXaWl6NXuc7r1UM6wFSbxbjT914vuGSj9dxSeVIXewoF0NKEfB3K6Nmm5D5S0h8AcvagxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2621282606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Ngo, Duc-Vu ; Kim, Young-Jin ; Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Duc-Vu ; Kim, Young-Jin ; Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creatorcontrib><description>This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-1073</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/en15020499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Buckets ; Commercialization ; Construction costs ; Design ; Dynamic response ; Earthquakes ; Environmental conditions ; Fragility ; fragility curve ; Ocean floor ; Offshore ; Offshore energy sources ; Offshore operations ; offshore wind turbine (OWT) ; scour ; Sea level ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Seismic stability ; shallow muddy seabed ; Suction ; suction bucket (SB) ; Turbines ; Wind power</subject><ispartof>Energies (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.15 (2), p.499</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-0881-0114 ; 0000-0003-0626-0447</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621282606/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2621282606?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Duc-Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</title><title>Energies (Basel)</title><description>This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.</description><subject>Buckets</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>fragility curve</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Offshore energy sources</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>offshore wind turbine (OWT)</subject><subject>scour</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic stability</subject><subject>shallow muddy seabed</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>suction bucket (SB)</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><issn>1996-1073</issn><issn>1996-1073</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU9LxDAQxYsoKOrFTxDwJlTzp02Toy6uCuIeVvEY0nRGs3ab3aQV9tvbdUWdywyPH29meFl2xuilEJpeQcdKymmh9V52xLSWOaOV2P83H2anKS3oWEIwIcRRtp6DT0vvyDTaN9_6fkOuU4KUltD1JCCx5Cl8Qkvmg-t96MjN4D6gJ9MwdI39VjBEMkNM7yECefVdQ56HWPsOyIhAJHMXhkgmoWv8lj_JDtC2CU5_-nH2Mr19ntznj7O7h8n1Y-6EZH2uGJROIqha1ci40spprBiWktMaFEfpUIJUSB1XtChVUSFUqkHnKOUOxHH2sPNtgl2YVfRLGzcmWG--hRDfjI29dy0YYE5LjbounCpUwa1mBddCIuXaWl6NXuc7r1UM6wFSbxbjT914vuGSj9dxSeVIXewoF0NKEfB3K6Nmm5D5S0h8AcvagxA</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Ngo, Duc-Vu</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Jin</creator><creator>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0881-0114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0447</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</title><author>Ngo, Duc-Vu ; Kim, Young-Jin ; Kim, Dong-Hyawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Buckets</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>fragility curve</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Offshore energy sources</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>offshore wind turbine (OWT)</topic><topic>scour</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic stability</topic><topic>shallow muddy seabed</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>suction bucket (SB)</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Duc-Vu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ngo, Duc-Vu</au><au>Kim, Young-Jin</au><au>Kim, Dong-Hyawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition</atitle><jtitle>Energies (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>499</spage><pages>499-</pages><issn>1996-1073</issn><eissn>1996-1073</eissn><abstract>This study proposed a new suction bucket (SB) foundation model for offshore wind turbines (OWT) suitable for a shallow muddy seabed, using more than three single buckets through kinetic derivation. The performance of new optimal foundation was evaluated by its horizontal displacement capacity and compared with a conventional SB composed of three buckets. Under external loads such as earthquakes, wind, and the combination of the both, the stability of this novel SB foundation was verified. The seismic fragility curve was also evaluated at some scour depths. These results were compared with the response of a tripod suction bucket (TSB) foundation, which was also designed for a shallow muddy seabed. The results indicated that scour significantly changed the dynamic response of this novel SB foundation but it had a better bearing capacity than the TSB foundation, despite its smaller size and weight. The fragility of TSB is always higher than the developed foundation in the same environmental condition. With reasonable volume and size, this novel SB foundation has great potential for future industrialization and commercialization.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/en15020499</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0881-0114</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0626-0447</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1996-1073 |
ispartof | Energies (Basel), 2022-01, Vol.15 (2), p.499 |
issn | 1996-1073 1996-1073 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e1c969f9b4c84842a9142936f029aa27 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Buckets Commercialization Construction costs Design Dynamic response Earthquakes Environmental conditions Fragility fragility curve Ocean floor Offshore Offshore energy sources Offshore operations offshore wind turbine (OWT) scour Sea level Seismic activity Seismic response Seismic stability shallow muddy seabed Suction suction bucket (SB) Turbines Wind power |
title | Seismic Fragility Assessment of a Novel Suction Bucket Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbine under Scour Condition |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T03%3A13%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20Fragility%20Assessment%20of%20a%20Novel%20Suction%20Bucket%20Foundation%20for%20Offshore%20Wind%20Turbine%20under%20Scour%20Condition&rft.jtitle=Energies%20(Basel)&rft.au=Ngo,%20Duc-Vu&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=499&rft.pages=499-&rft.issn=1996-1073&rft.eissn=1996-1073&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/en15020499&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2621282606%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-81e5c6fe8b8bf12898c9f71f5620be82f6cf6e68f0c28045847fe78dfcc002ce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2621282606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |