Loading…

Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial

This study evaluated the minimal invasiveness, safety, and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement procedure using a modified tracer fixation device. Patients were randomly assigned to conventional fixation group (25 patients) and modified fixation group (27 patients). No baseline statist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2020-04, Vol.21 (1), p.208-208, Article 208
Main Authors: Yongqi, Li, Dehua, Zhang, Hongzi, Wu, Ke, Zhang, Rui, Yang, Zhou, Fang, Shaobo, Wang, Yi, Liao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study evaluated the minimal invasiveness, safety, and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement procedure using a modified tracer fixation device. Patients were randomly assigned to conventional fixation group (25 patients) and modified fixation group (27 patients). No baseline statistical difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05). The length of unnecessary incision, amount of bleeding, and fixation duration for tracer fixation respectively were 6.08 ± 1.02 mm, 1.46 ± 0.84 ml, and 1.56 ± 0.32 min in the modified fixation group and 40.28 ± 8.52 mm, 12.02 ± 2.24 ml, and 5.08 ± 1.06 min in the conventional group. The difference between both groups was significant (P  0.05). The modified minimally invasive procedure for tracer fixation results in minimal trauma and is simple, reliable, and highly safe. Additionally, the procedure does not compromise the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Thus, it has great clinical applicable value. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: Registration number, ChiCTR1800016680; Registration Date, 15/06/2018.
ISSN:1471-2474
1471-2474
DOI:10.1186/s12891-020-03239-9