Health care for immigrants in Europe: is there still consensus among country experts about principles of good practice? A Delphi study

• Published in: BMC public health 2011-09, Vol.11 (1), p.699-699, Article 699
• Main Authors: Devillé, Walter, Greacen, Tim, Bogic, Marija, Dauvrin, Marie, Dias, Sónia, Gaddini, Andrea, Jensen, Natasja Koitzsch, Karamanidou, Christina, Kluge, Ulrike, Mertaniemi, Ritva, Riera, Rosa P i, Sárváry, Attila, Soares, Joaquim J F, Stankunas, Mindaugas, Strassmayr, Christa, Welbel, Marta, Priebe, Stefan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Attitude of Health Personnel; Civil rights; Consensus; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration; Delphi method; Delphi Technique; Emigrants and Immigrants; Europe; Health aspects; Health care access; Health sciences; Health services; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Immigrants; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Mental health; Migration; Minority & ethnic groups; Policy Making; Psychiatry; Public health
• ISSN: 1471-2458; 1471-2458
• DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-699

European Member States are facing a challenge to provide accessible and effective health care services for immigrants. It remains unclear how best to achieve this and what characterises good practice in increasingly multicultural societies across Europe. This study assessed the views and values of professionals working in different health care contexts and in different European countries as to what constitutes good practice in health care for immigrants. A total of 134 experts in 16 EU Member States participated in a three-round Delphi process. The experts represented four different fields: academia, Non-Governmental Organisations, policy-making and health care practice. For each country, the process aimed to produce a national consensus list of the most important factors characterising good practice in health care for migrants. The scoring procedures resulted in 10 to 16 factors being identified as the most important for each participating country. All 186 factors were aggregated into 9 themes: (1) easy and equal access to health care, (2) empowerment of migrants, (3) culturally sensitive health care services, (4) quality of care, (5) patient/health care provider communication, (6) respect towards migrants, (7) networking in and outside health services, (8) targeted outreach activities, and (9) availability of data about specificities in migrant health care and prevention. Although local political debate, level of immigration and the nature of local health care systems influenced the selection and rating of factors within each country, there was a broad European consensus on most factors. Yet, discordance remained both within countries, e.g. on the need for prioritising cultural differences, and between countries, e.g. on the need for more consistent governance of health care services for immigrants. Experts across Europe asserted the right to culturally sensitive health care for all immigrants. There is a broad consensus among experts about the major principles of good practice that need to be implemented across Europe. However, there also is some disagreement both within and between countries on specific issues that require further research and debate.