Loading…
How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?
The establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Romania constitutes a turning point for the policy on biodiversity conservation in this country. The presence of human communities in certain Natura 2000 areas determines complex interactions between social and ecological systems, particularly in the c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Land (Basel) 2020-12, Vol.9 (12), p.484 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 484 |
container_title | Land (Basel) |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Toth, Georgiana Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina Toth, Alexandru-Ioan Stoiculescu, Robert |
description | The establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Romania constitutes a turning point for the policy on biodiversity conservation in this country. The presence of human communities in certain Natura 2000 areas determines complex interactions between social and ecological systems, particularly in the case of High Nature Value farmlands that are assigned to this network of protected natural areas. A large part of Romania’s biodiversity depends on traditional farming systems that are under pressure from either agricultural intensification or land abandonment, which reflects socio-economic changes that have pushed rural households into developing new livelihood strategies. This paper explores the particular context of traditional rural communities from Southern Transylvania which is a High Nature Value farmland area largely included in the Natura 2000 network. We conducted an empirical analysis that focused on two main issues. The first was applying quantitative methods aimed at identifying the linkages between livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies of people living in Natura 2000 areas. The second was analyzing differences in local development levels which correlate with the share of territorial administrative units belonging to Natura 2000 areas. Our results are based on questionnaire and interview data collected from 40 rural administrative-territorial units within Southern Transylvania as well as on mapping land use changes using Landsat satellite images of 1985, 2003 and 2015. The results indicate that rural communities living in Natura 2000 areas turn to migration as an additional household strategy besides usual on-farm and off-farm activities, leading to rural shrinkage and farmland abandonment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/land9120484 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e28982c3f541496fa8f618c9ec5fc4bb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e28982c3f541496fa8f618c9ec5fc4bb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2467505878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1qHDEQhZsQQ4zjVS4gyNJM0vrplrQKxj-ZgcE22AnZiWqpNKOh3RpLahvvkmPkej6J254QXJsq6j2-elBV9YnWXzjX9dceBqcpq4US76p9Vks-E6L59f7N_KE6zHlTT6UpV6LZr_7M4wM5jeQCypiAsEkixwkhk8VQMGW0hTyEsiZXGLc95qfff8ky3GMf1jE6cl0SFFwFzCQMZB5W6x0JyU_oRyTnkG5fcr3K13Esa0wDuUkw5Mf-HoYA3z5Wex76jIf_-kH14_zs5mQ-W15-X5wcL2eWt6LM0CpFUerOeyeVbDVI5nynNJXOdpx3tdBKUi87ZK2Ubed0I6lD3mjvNPP8oFrsuC7CxmxTuIX0aCIE87qIaWUglWB7NMiUVsxy3wgqdOtB-ZYqq9E23oqum1ifd6xtincj5mI2cUzDFN8w0cqmbpRUk-to57Ip5pzQ_79Ka_PyMvPmZfwZ_laK2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2467505878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Toth, Georgiana ; Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina ; Toth, Alexandru-Ioan ; Stoiculescu, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Toth, Georgiana ; Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina ; Toth, Alexandru-Ioan ; Stoiculescu, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>The establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Romania constitutes a turning point for the policy on biodiversity conservation in this country. The presence of human communities in certain Natura 2000 areas determines complex interactions between social and ecological systems, particularly in the case of High Nature Value farmlands that are assigned to this network of protected natural areas. A large part of Romania’s biodiversity depends on traditional farming systems that are under pressure from either agricultural intensification or land abandonment, which reflects socio-economic changes that have pushed rural households into developing new livelihood strategies. This paper explores the particular context of traditional rural communities from Southern Transylvania which is a High Nature Value farmland area largely included in the Natura 2000 network. We conducted an empirical analysis that focused on two main issues. The first was applying quantitative methods aimed at identifying the linkages between livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies of people living in Natura 2000 areas. The second was analyzing differences in local development levels which correlate with the share of territorial administrative units belonging to Natura 2000 areas. Our results are based on questionnaire and interview data collected from 40 rural administrative-territorial units within Southern Transylvania as well as on mapping land use changes using Landsat satellite images of 1985, 2003 and 2015. The results indicate that rural communities living in Natura 2000 areas turn to migration as an additional household strategy besides usual on-farm and off-farm activities, leading to rural shrinkage and farmland abandonment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-445X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-445X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/land9120484</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abandoned land ; Agricultural land ; Agriculture ; Agronomy ; Biodiversity ; Community ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental economics ; Farmers ; Farming systems ; Farms ; high nature value farmland ; Households ; Human capital ; Intensive farming ; Land use ; Landsat ; Landsat satellites ; Livelihood ; livelihood capitals ; peoples’ livelihood strategies ; Principal components analysis ; Questionnaires ; Remote sensing ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Satellite imagery ; Statistical methods ; Traditional farming ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Land (Basel), 2020-12, Vol.9 (12), p.484</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9631-640X ; 0000-0003-2299-7449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2467505878/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2467505878?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Toth, Georgiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toth, Alexandru-Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoiculescu, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?</title><title>Land (Basel)</title><description>The establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Romania constitutes a turning point for the policy on biodiversity conservation in this country. The presence of human communities in certain Natura 2000 areas determines complex interactions between social and ecological systems, particularly in the case of High Nature Value farmlands that are assigned to this network of protected natural areas. A large part of Romania’s biodiversity depends on traditional farming systems that are under pressure from either agricultural intensification or land abandonment, which reflects socio-economic changes that have pushed rural households into developing new livelihood strategies. This paper explores the particular context of traditional rural communities from Southern Transylvania which is a High Nature Value farmland area largely included in the Natura 2000 network. We conducted an empirical analysis that focused on two main issues. The first was applying quantitative methods aimed at identifying the linkages between livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies of people living in Natura 2000 areas. The second was analyzing differences in local development levels which correlate with the share of territorial administrative units belonging to Natura 2000 areas. Our results are based on questionnaire and interview data collected from 40 rural administrative-territorial units within Southern Transylvania as well as on mapping land use changes using Landsat satellite images of 1985, 2003 and 2015. The results indicate that rural communities living in Natura 2000 areas turn to migration as an additional household strategy besides usual on-farm and off-farm activities, leading to rural shrinkage and farmland abandonment.</description><subject>Abandoned land</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental economics</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>high nature value farmland</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Intensive farming</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landsat</subject><subject>Landsat satellites</subject><subject>Livelihood</subject><subject>livelihood capitals</subject><subject>peoples’ livelihood strategies</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Traditional farming</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2073-445X</issn><issn>2073-445X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1qHDEQhZsQQ4zjVS4gyNJM0vrplrQKxj-ZgcE22AnZiWqpNKOh3RpLahvvkmPkej6J254QXJsq6j2-elBV9YnWXzjX9dceBqcpq4US76p9Vks-E6L59f7N_KE6zHlTT6UpV6LZr_7M4wM5jeQCypiAsEkixwkhk8VQMGW0hTyEsiZXGLc95qfff8ky3GMf1jE6cl0SFFwFzCQMZB5W6x0JyU_oRyTnkG5fcr3K13Esa0wDuUkw5Mf-HoYA3z5Wex76jIf_-kH14_zs5mQ-W15-X5wcL2eWt6LM0CpFUerOeyeVbDVI5nynNJXOdpx3tdBKUi87ZK2Ubed0I6lD3mjvNPP8oFrsuC7CxmxTuIX0aCIE87qIaWUglWB7NMiUVsxy3wgqdOtB-ZYqq9E23oqum1ifd6xtincj5mI2cUzDFN8w0cqmbpRUk-to57Ip5pzQ_79Ka_PyMvPmZfwZ_laK2A</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Toth, Georgiana</creator><creator>Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina</creator><creator>Toth, Alexandru-Ioan</creator><creator>Stoiculescu, Robert</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9631-640X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-7449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?</title><author>Toth, Georgiana ; Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina ; Toth, Alexandru-Ioan ; Stoiculescu, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abandoned land</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental economics</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>high nature value farmland</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Intensive farming</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landsat</topic><topic>Landsat satellites</topic><topic>Livelihood</topic><topic>livelihood capitals</topic><topic>peoples’ livelihood strategies</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Traditional farming</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Toth, Georgiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toth, Alexandru-Ioan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoiculescu, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Land (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Toth, Georgiana</au><au>Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina</au><au>Toth, Alexandru-Ioan</au><au>Stoiculescu, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania?</atitle><jtitle>Land (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>484</spage><pages>484-</pages><issn>2073-445X</issn><eissn>2073-445X</eissn><abstract>The establishment of the Natura 2000 network in Romania constitutes a turning point for the policy on biodiversity conservation in this country. The presence of human communities in certain Natura 2000 areas determines complex interactions between social and ecological systems, particularly in the case of High Nature Value farmlands that are assigned to this network of protected natural areas. A large part of Romania’s biodiversity depends on traditional farming systems that are under pressure from either agricultural intensification or land abandonment, which reflects socio-economic changes that have pushed rural households into developing new livelihood strategies. This paper explores the particular context of traditional rural communities from Southern Transylvania which is a High Nature Value farmland area largely included in the Natura 2000 network. We conducted an empirical analysis that focused on two main issues. The first was applying quantitative methods aimed at identifying the linkages between livelihood capitals and livelihood strategies of people living in Natura 2000 areas. The second was analyzing differences in local development levels which correlate with the share of territorial administrative units belonging to Natura 2000 areas. Our results are based on questionnaire and interview data collected from 40 rural administrative-territorial units within Southern Transylvania as well as on mapping land use changes using Landsat satellite images of 1985, 2003 and 2015. The results indicate that rural communities living in Natura 2000 areas turn to migration as an additional household strategy besides usual on-farm and off-farm activities, leading to rural shrinkage and farmland abandonment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/land9120484</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9631-640X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-7449</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-445X |
ispartof | Land (Basel), 2020-12, Vol.9 (12), p.484 |
issn | 2073-445X 2073-445X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e28982c3f541496fa8f618c9ec5fc4bb |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Abandoned land Agricultural land Agriculture Agronomy Biodiversity Community Data analysis Data collection Empirical analysis Environmental economics Farmers Farming systems Farms high nature value farmland Households Human capital Intensive farming Land use Landsat Landsat satellites Livelihood livelihood capitals peoples’ livelihood strategies Principal components analysis Questionnaires Remote sensing Rural areas Rural communities Satellite imagery Statistical methods Traditional farming Wildlife conservation |
title | How Do Natura 2000 Areas Intersect with Peoples’ Livelihood Strategies in High Nature Value Farmlands in Southern Transylvania? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T14%3A48%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Do%20Natura%202000%20Areas%20Intersect%20with%20Peoples%E2%80%99%20Livelihood%20Strategies%20in%20High%20Nature%20Value%20Farmlands%20in%20Southern%20Transylvania?&rft.jtitle=Land%20(Basel)&rft.au=Toth,%20Georgiana&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=484&rft.pages=484-&rft.issn=2073-445X&rft.eissn=2073-445X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/land9120484&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2467505878%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-ec881e79bffd78769a72dfb8917dcb33b049871f7be26776bd9571de359fd92f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2467505878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |