Loading…

Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia

Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Heliyon 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29727-e29727, Article e29727
Main Authors: Adedokun, Olufisayo, Egbelakin, Temitope, Sher, Willy, Gajendran, Thayaparan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3
container_end_page e29727
container_issue 8
container_start_page e29727
container_title Heliyon
container_volume 10
creator Adedokun, Olufisayo
Egbelakin, Temitope
Sher, Willy
Gajendran, Thayaparan
description Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e2eb3834274c4eaca0021f4fa456f077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S240584402405758X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e2eb3834274c4eaca0021f4fa456f077</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3048494353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhU1paUKan9DiZTee6mlZqxJCHwOBbNq1uL6-ntHUY6WSnTL_vnI9DdkFBBKH754rzimK95xtOOP1p8NmT4M_hXEjmFAbEtYI86q4FIrpqlGKvX72viiuUzowxrhuamvk2-JCNnXDa24ui7AdHylNfgeTH3dlDziFmMp57CgOp0X6sz-V-zAn2ochi6mMdAQ_lvnAVEWffpUQCVLZzXHh2zntex-p7HyCNFFcyJs5TREGD--KNz0Mia7P91Xx8-uXH7ffq7v7b9vbm7sKlbZT1ba6ByulQG5bZFqDrqXmhMQEIiA3fSdrbdGAtSTBYN0KzYxhyCw0KK-K7erbBTi4h-iPEE8ugHf_hBB3DuLkcSBHglrZSCWMQkWAwJjgvepB6brPltnr4-r1EMPvOafljj4hDQOMlINxkmvZcKlV_TLKVKOsklpmVK8oxpBSpP7pl5y5pWV3cOeW3dKyW1vOcx_OK-b2SN3T1P9OM_B5BSjn--gpuoSeRqQut4JTDsC_sOIvgFK9Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048494353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Adedokun, Olufisayo ; Egbelakin, Temitope ; Sher, Willy ; Gajendran, Thayaparan</creator><creatorcontrib>Adedokun, Olufisayo ; Egbelakin, Temitope ; Sher, Willy ; Gajendran, Thayaparan</creatorcontrib><description>Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38681617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Black summer ; Bushfires ; Disasters ; Fatality ; Householders ; pet ownership ; shrublands</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29727-e29727, Article e29727</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3018-1597 ; 0000-0002-8091-4608 ; 0000-0002-7086-2437 ; 0000-0002-7775-2900</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402405758X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3536,27905,27906,45761</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38681617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adedokun, Olufisayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbelakin, Temitope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sher, Willy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajendran, Thayaparan</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</title><title>Heliyon</title><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><description>Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Black summer</subject><subject>Bushfires</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Fatality</subject><subject>Householders</subject><subject>pet ownership</subject><subject>shrublands</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhU1paUKan9DiZTee6mlZqxJCHwOBbNq1uL6-ntHUY6WSnTL_vnI9DdkFBBKH754rzimK95xtOOP1p8NmT4M_hXEjmFAbEtYI86q4FIrpqlGKvX72viiuUzowxrhuamvk2-JCNnXDa24ui7AdHylNfgeTH3dlDziFmMp57CgOp0X6sz-V-zAn2ochi6mMdAQ_lvnAVEWffpUQCVLZzXHh2zntex-p7HyCNFFcyJs5TREGD--KNz0Mia7P91Xx8-uXH7ffq7v7b9vbm7sKlbZT1ba6ByulQG5bZFqDrqXmhMQEIiA3fSdrbdGAtSTBYN0KzYxhyCw0KK-K7erbBTi4h-iPEE8ugHf_hBB3DuLkcSBHglrZSCWMQkWAwJjgvepB6brPltnr4-r1EMPvOafljj4hDQOMlINxkmvZcKlV_TLKVKOsklpmVK8oxpBSpP7pl5y5pWV3cOeW3dKyW1vOcx_OK-b2SN3T1P9OM_B5BSjn--gpuoSeRqQut4JTDsC_sOIvgFK9Gg</recordid><startdate>20240430</startdate><enddate>20240430</enddate><creator>Adedokun, Olufisayo</creator><creator>Egbelakin, Temitope</creator><creator>Sher, Willy</creator><creator>Gajendran, Thayaparan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3018-1597</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-2437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-2900</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240430</creationdate><title>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</title><author>Adedokun, Olufisayo ; Egbelakin, Temitope ; Sher, Willy ; Gajendran, Thayaparan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Black summer</topic><topic>Bushfires</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Fatality</topic><topic>Householders</topic><topic>pet ownership</topic><topic>shrublands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adedokun, Olufisayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbelakin, Temitope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sher, Willy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajendran, Thayaparan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adedokun, Olufisayo</au><au>Egbelakin, Temitope</au><au>Sher, Willy</au><au>Gajendran, Thayaparan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><date>2024-04-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e29727</spage><epage>e29727</epage><pages>e29727-e29727</pages><artnum>e29727</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38681617</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3018-1597</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-2437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-2900</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-8440
ispartof Heliyon, 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29727-e29727, Article e29727
issn 2405-8440
2405-8440
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e2eb3834274c4eaca0021f4fa456f077
source ScienceDirect®; PubMed Central
subjects Australia
Black summer
Bushfires
Disasters
Fatality
Householders
pet ownership
shrublands
title Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20factors%20underlying%20why%20householders%20remain%20in%20at-risk%20areas%20during%20bushfire%20disaster%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Adedokun,%20Olufisayo&rft.date=2024-04-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e29727&rft.epage=e29727&rft.pages=e29727-e29727&rft.artnum=e29727&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3048494353%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048494353&rft_id=info:pmid/38681617&rfr_iscdi=true