Loading…
Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia
Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Heliyon 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29727-e29727, Article e29727 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3 |
container_end_page | e29727 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | e29727 |
container_title | Heliyon |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Adedokun, Olufisayo Egbelakin, Temitope Sher, Willy Gajendran, Thayaparan |
description | Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e2eb3834274c4eaca0021f4fa456f077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S240584402405758X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e2eb3834274c4eaca0021f4fa456f077</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3048494353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhU1paUKan9DiZTee6mlZqxJCHwOBbNq1uL6-ntHUY6WSnTL_vnI9DdkFBBKH754rzimK95xtOOP1p8NmT4M_hXEjmFAbEtYI86q4FIrpqlGKvX72viiuUzowxrhuamvk2-JCNnXDa24ui7AdHylNfgeTH3dlDziFmMp57CgOp0X6sz-V-zAn2ochi6mMdAQ_lvnAVEWffpUQCVLZzXHh2zntex-p7HyCNFFcyJs5TREGD--KNz0Mia7P91Xx8-uXH7ffq7v7b9vbm7sKlbZT1ba6ByulQG5bZFqDrqXmhMQEIiA3fSdrbdGAtSTBYN0KzYxhyCw0KK-K7erbBTi4h-iPEE8ugHf_hBB3DuLkcSBHglrZSCWMQkWAwJjgvepB6brPltnr4-r1EMPvOafljj4hDQOMlINxkmvZcKlV_TLKVKOsklpmVK8oxpBSpP7pl5y5pWV3cOeW3dKyW1vOcx_OK-b2SN3T1P9OM_B5BSjn--gpuoSeRqQut4JTDsC_sOIvgFK9Gg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048494353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</title><source>ScienceDirect®</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Adedokun, Olufisayo ; Egbelakin, Temitope ; Sher, Willy ; Gajendran, Thayaparan</creator><creatorcontrib>Adedokun, Olufisayo ; Egbelakin, Temitope ; Sher, Willy ; Gajendran, Thayaparan</creatorcontrib><description>Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-8440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38681617</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Black summer ; Bushfires ; Disasters ; Fatality ; Householders ; pet ownership ; shrublands</subject><ispartof>Heliyon, 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29727-e29727, Article e29727</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3018-1597 ; 0000-0002-8091-4608 ; 0000-0002-7086-2437 ; 0000-0002-7775-2900</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402405758X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3536,27905,27906,45761</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38681617$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adedokun, Olufisayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbelakin, Temitope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sher, Willy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajendran, Thayaparan</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</title><title>Heliyon</title><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><description>Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Black summer</subject><subject>Bushfires</subject><subject>Disasters</subject><subject>Fatality</subject><subject>Householders</subject><subject>pet ownership</subject><subject>shrublands</subject><issn>2405-8440</issn><issn>2405-8440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhU1paUKan9DiZTee6mlZqxJCHwOBbNq1uL6-ntHUY6WSnTL_vnI9DdkFBBKH754rzimK95xtOOP1p8NmT4M_hXEjmFAbEtYI86q4FIrpqlGKvX72viiuUzowxrhuamvk2-JCNnXDa24ui7AdHylNfgeTH3dlDziFmMp57CgOp0X6sz-V-zAn2ochi6mMdAQ_lvnAVEWffpUQCVLZzXHh2zntex-p7HyCNFFcyJs5TREGD--KNz0Mia7P91Xx8-uXH7ffq7v7b9vbm7sKlbZT1ba6ByulQG5bZFqDrqXmhMQEIiA3fSdrbdGAtSTBYN0KzYxhyCw0KK-K7erbBTi4h-iPEE8ugHf_hBB3DuLkcSBHglrZSCWMQkWAwJjgvepB6brPltnr4-r1EMPvOafljj4hDQOMlINxkmvZcKlV_TLKVKOsklpmVK8oxpBSpP7pl5y5pWV3cOeW3dKyW1vOcx_OK-b2SN3T1P9OM_B5BSjn--gpuoSeRqQut4JTDsC_sOIvgFK9Gg</recordid><startdate>20240430</startdate><enddate>20240430</enddate><creator>Adedokun, Olufisayo</creator><creator>Egbelakin, Temitope</creator><creator>Sher, Willy</creator><creator>Gajendran, Thayaparan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3018-1597</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-2437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-2900</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240430</creationdate><title>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</title><author>Adedokun, Olufisayo ; Egbelakin, Temitope ; Sher, Willy ; Gajendran, Thayaparan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Black summer</topic><topic>Bushfires</topic><topic>Disasters</topic><topic>Fatality</topic><topic>Householders</topic><topic>pet ownership</topic><topic>shrublands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adedokun, Olufisayo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbelakin, Temitope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sher, Willy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajendran, Thayaparan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adedokun, Olufisayo</au><au>Egbelakin, Temitope</au><au>Sher, Willy</au><au>Gajendran, Thayaparan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia</atitle><jtitle>Heliyon</jtitle><addtitle>Heliyon</addtitle><date>2024-04-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e29727</spage><epage>e29727</epage><pages>e29727-e29727</pages><artnum>e29727</artnum><issn>2405-8440</issn><eissn>2405-8440</eissn><abstract>Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders’ choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38681617</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3018-1597</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8091-4608</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7086-2437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-2900</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2405-8440 |
ispartof | Heliyon, 2024-04, Vol.10 (8), p.e29727-e29727, Article e29727 |
issn | 2405-8440 2405-8440 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e2eb3834274c4eaca0021f4fa456f077 |
source | ScienceDirect®; PubMed Central |
subjects | Australia Black summer Bushfires Disasters Fatality Householders pet ownership shrublands |
title | Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A29%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20factors%20underlying%20why%20householders%20remain%20in%20at-risk%20areas%20during%20bushfire%20disaster%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Heliyon&rft.au=Adedokun,%20Olufisayo&rft.date=2024-04-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e29727&rft.epage=e29727&rft.pages=e29727-e29727&rft.artnum=e29727&rft.issn=2405-8440&rft.eissn=2405-8440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3048494353%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-bb5fa9332c19bc055a56351ece02ccac17fd3659c7a99e3a7c6b250770c09a8c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048494353&rft_id=info:pmid/38681617&rfr_iscdi=true |