Loading…
Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era
Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pharmaceutics 2021-09, Vol.13 (10), p.1574 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1574 |
container_title | Pharmaceutics |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Naughton, Piers J. Joyce, Mary Mac Giolla Eain, Marc O’Sullivan, Andrew MacLoughlin, Ronan |
description | Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e3314a5e438549f992abf1a06527940c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e3314a5e438549f992abf1a06527940c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2584787826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9rGzEQxZfS0oQ0H6Eg6KUXN_q7K10KxnZbQ4ovba5iVjtry8grV9o15NtHiUNJSnUZoff4MXozVfWR0S9CGHpz3EE6gMNp9C4zwShTjXxTXTJjzEwaLt6-uF9U1znvaTlCMC3M--pCyFoLXTeXlVudIEww-jiQ2JM5pphjIMs0bckSgz9huieb46OeSTclP2zJvJvCSH6i28HgHQRyh8PowxniBzLukCw2d-vljBmySvChetdDyHj9XK-q399WvxY_Zreb7-vF_HbmpObjzEFPjVYKqGwlUqDQ964xXSsAW9cWWdWNlKbmXKFosKUAnAnaMda2NfTiqlqfuV2EvT0mf4B0byN4-_QQ09ZCKokFtFiikKBQCq2k6Y3h0PYMaK14YyR1hfX1zDpO7QE7V36YILyCvlYGv7PbeLJaCSPrpgA-PwNS_DNhHu3BZ4chwIBxypYrLRvdaF4X66d_rPs4paFE9eSStaCaF5c6u1wZUU7Y_22GUfu4Ffa_WyEeAEU6rVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584463082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Naughton, Piers J. ; Joyce, Mary ; Mac Giolla Eain, Marc ; O’Sullivan, Andrew ; MacLoughlin, Ronan</creator><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Piers J. ; Joyce, Mary ; Mac Giolla Eain, Marc ; O’Sullivan, Andrew ; MacLoughlin, Ronan</creatorcontrib><description>Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34683867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>adapter ; aerosol ; Aerosols ; Caregivers ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease transmission ; Drug delivery systems ; Drug dosages ; Efficiency ; jet nebuliser ; Pandemics ; Patients ; pressurised metered-dose inhaler ; Recovery (Medical) ; spacer ; Ventilators ; vibrating mesh nebuliser</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutics, 2021-09, Vol.13 (10), p.1574</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2404-0667 ; 0000-0002-0211-2132 ; 0000-0002-3164-1607 ; 0000-0002-5434-1260</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2584463082/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2584463082?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,38495,43874,44569,53769,53771,74158,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Piers J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLoughlin, Ronan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</title><title>Pharmaceutics</title><description>Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.</description><subject>adapter</subject><subject>aerosol</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>jet nebuliser</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pressurised metered-dose inhaler</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>spacer</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>vibrating mesh nebuliser</subject><issn>1999-4923</issn><issn>1999-4923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9rGzEQxZfS0oQ0H6Eg6KUXN_q7K10KxnZbQ4ovba5iVjtry8grV9o15NtHiUNJSnUZoff4MXozVfWR0S9CGHpz3EE6gMNp9C4zwShTjXxTXTJjzEwaLt6-uF9U1znvaTlCMC3M--pCyFoLXTeXlVudIEww-jiQ2JM5pphjIMs0bckSgz9huieb46OeSTclP2zJvJvCSH6i28HgHQRyh8PowxniBzLukCw2d-vljBmySvChetdDyHj9XK-q399WvxY_Zreb7-vF_HbmpObjzEFPjVYKqGwlUqDQ964xXSsAW9cWWdWNlKbmXKFosKUAnAnaMda2NfTiqlqfuV2EvT0mf4B0byN4-_QQ09ZCKokFtFiikKBQCq2k6Y3h0PYMaK14YyR1hfX1zDpO7QE7V36YILyCvlYGv7PbeLJaCSPrpgA-PwNS_DNhHu3BZ4chwIBxypYrLRvdaF4X66d_rPs4paFE9eSStaCaF5c6u1wZUU7Y_22GUfu4Ffa_WyEeAEU6rVg</recordid><startdate>20210928</startdate><enddate>20210928</enddate><creator>Naughton, Piers J.</creator><creator>Joyce, Mary</creator><creator>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</creator><creator>O’Sullivan, Andrew</creator><creator>MacLoughlin, Ronan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-0667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-2132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-1607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-1260</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210928</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</title><author>Naughton, Piers J. ; Joyce, Mary ; Mac Giolla Eain, Marc ; O’Sullivan, Andrew ; MacLoughlin, Ronan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adapter</topic><topic>aerosol</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>jet nebuliser</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pressurised metered-dose inhaler</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>spacer</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>vibrating mesh nebuliser</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Piers J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLoughlin, Ronan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naughton, Piers J.</au><au>Joyce, Mary</au><au>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</au><au>O’Sullivan, Andrew</au><au>MacLoughlin, Ronan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutics</jtitle><date>2021-09-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1574</spage><pages>1574-</pages><issn>1999-4923</issn><eissn>1999-4923</eissn><abstract>Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34683867</pmid><doi>10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-0667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-2132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-1607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-1260</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1999-4923 |
ispartof | Pharmaceutics, 2021-09, Vol.13 (10), p.1574 |
issn | 1999-4923 1999-4923 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e3314a5e438549f992abf1a06527940c |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | adapter aerosol Aerosols Caregivers Coronaviruses COVID-19 Disease transmission Drug delivery systems Drug dosages Efficiency jet nebuliser Pandemics Patients pressurised metered-dose inhaler Recovery (Medical) spacer Ventilators vibrating mesh nebuliser |
title | Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A41%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Aerosol%20Drug%20Delivery%20Options%20during%20Adult%20Mechanical%20Ventilation%20in%20the%20COVID-19%20Era&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutics&rft.au=Naughton,%20Piers%20J.&rft.date=2021-09-28&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1574&rft.pages=1574-&rft.issn=1999-4923&rft.eissn=1999-4923&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2584787826%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584463082&rft_id=info:pmid/34683867&rfr_iscdi=true |