Loading…

Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era

Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pharmaceutics 2021-09, Vol.13 (10), p.1574
Main Authors: Naughton, Piers J., Joyce, Mary, Mac Giolla Eain, Marc, O’Sullivan, Andrew, MacLoughlin, Ronan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1574
container_title Pharmaceutics
container_volume 13
creator Naughton, Piers J.
Joyce, Mary
Mac Giolla Eain, Marc
O’Sullivan, Andrew
MacLoughlin, Ronan
description Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e3314a5e438549f992abf1a06527940c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e3314a5e438549f992abf1a06527940c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2584787826</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9rGzEQxZfS0oQ0H6Eg6KUXN_q7K10KxnZbQ4ovba5iVjtry8grV9o15NtHiUNJSnUZoff4MXozVfWR0S9CGHpz3EE6gMNp9C4zwShTjXxTXTJjzEwaLt6-uF9U1znvaTlCMC3M--pCyFoLXTeXlVudIEww-jiQ2JM5pphjIMs0bckSgz9huieb46OeSTclP2zJvJvCSH6i28HgHQRyh8PowxniBzLukCw2d-vljBmySvChetdDyHj9XK-q399WvxY_Zreb7-vF_HbmpObjzEFPjVYKqGwlUqDQ964xXSsAW9cWWdWNlKbmXKFosKUAnAnaMda2NfTiqlqfuV2EvT0mf4B0byN4-_QQ09ZCKokFtFiikKBQCq2k6Y3h0PYMaK14YyR1hfX1zDpO7QE7V36YILyCvlYGv7PbeLJaCSPrpgA-PwNS_DNhHu3BZ4chwIBxypYrLRvdaF4X66d_rPs4paFE9eSStaCaF5c6u1wZUU7Y_22GUfu4Ffa_WyEeAEU6rVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584463082</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Naughton, Piers J. ; Joyce, Mary ; Mac Giolla Eain, Marc ; O’Sullivan, Andrew ; MacLoughlin, Ronan</creator><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Piers J. ; Joyce, Mary ; Mac Giolla Eain, Marc ; O’Sullivan, Andrew ; MacLoughlin, Ronan</creatorcontrib><description>Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1999-4923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1999-4923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34683867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>adapter ; aerosol ; Aerosols ; Caregivers ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease transmission ; Drug delivery systems ; Drug dosages ; Efficiency ; jet nebuliser ; Pandemics ; Patients ; pressurised metered-dose inhaler ; Recovery (Medical) ; spacer ; Ventilators ; vibrating mesh nebuliser</subject><ispartof>Pharmaceutics, 2021-09, Vol.13 (10), p.1574</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2404-0667 ; 0000-0002-0211-2132 ; 0000-0002-3164-1607 ; 0000-0002-5434-1260</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2584463082/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2584463082?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25732,27903,27904,36991,36992,38495,43874,44569,53769,53771,74158,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Piers J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLoughlin, Ronan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</title><title>Pharmaceutics</title><description>Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.</description><subject>adapter</subject><subject>aerosol</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>jet nebuliser</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>pressurised metered-dose inhaler</subject><subject>Recovery (Medical)</subject><subject>spacer</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>vibrating mesh nebuliser</subject><issn>1999-4923</issn><issn>1999-4923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9rGzEQxZfS0oQ0H6Eg6KUXN_q7K10KxnZbQ4ovba5iVjtry8grV9o15NtHiUNJSnUZoff4MXozVfWR0S9CGHpz3EE6gMNp9C4zwShTjXxTXTJjzEwaLt6-uF9U1znvaTlCMC3M--pCyFoLXTeXlVudIEww-jiQ2JM5pphjIMs0bckSgz9huieb46OeSTclP2zJvJvCSH6i28HgHQRyh8PowxniBzLukCw2d-vljBmySvChetdDyHj9XK-q399WvxY_Zreb7-vF_HbmpObjzEFPjVYKqGwlUqDQ964xXSsAW9cWWdWNlKbmXKFosKUAnAnaMda2NfTiqlqfuV2EvT0mf4B0byN4-_QQ09ZCKokFtFiikKBQCq2k6Y3h0PYMaK14YyR1hfX1zDpO7QE7V36YILyCvlYGv7PbeLJaCSPrpgA-PwNS_DNhHu3BZ4chwIBxypYrLRvdaF4X66d_rPs4paFE9eSStaCaF5c6u1wZUU7Y_22GUfu4Ffa_WyEeAEU6rVg</recordid><startdate>20210928</startdate><enddate>20210928</enddate><creator>Naughton, Piers J.</creator><creator>Joyce, Mary</creator><creator>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</creator><creator>O’Sullivan, Andrew</creator><creator>MacLoughlin, Ronan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-0667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-2132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-1607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-1260</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210928</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</title><author>Naughton, Piers J. ; Joyce, Mary ; Mac Giolla Eain, Marc ; O’Sullivan, Andrew ; MacLoughlin, Ronan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>adapter</topic><topic>aerosol</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>jet nebuliser</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>pressurised metered-dose inhaler</topic><topic>Recovery (Medical)</topic><topic>spacer</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>vibrating mesh nebuliser</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naughton, Piers J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Sullivan, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLoughlin, Ronan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Pharmaceutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naughton, Piers J.</au><au>Joyce, Mary</au><au>Mac Giolla Eain, Marc</au><au>O’Sullivan, Andrew</au><au>MacLoughlin, Ronan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era</atitle><jtitle>Pharmaceutics</jtitle><date>2021-09-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1574</spage><pages>1574-</pages><issn>1999-4923</issn><eissn>1999-4923</eissn><abstract>Drug delivery devices used for aerosol therapy during mechanical ventilation to ease the symptoms of respiratory diseases provide beneficial treatment but can also pose challenges. Reflecting the significant changes in global guidance around aerosol usage and lung-protective ventilation strategies, seen in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first time, we describe the drug delivery performance of commonly used devices under these conditions. Here, vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN), jet nebuliser (JN) and pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) performance was assessed during simulated adult mechanical ventilation. Both standard test breathing patterns and those representatives of low tidal volume (LTV) ventilation with concurrent active and passive humidification were investigated. Drug delivery using a VMN was significantly greater than that with a JN and pMDI for both standard and LTV ventilation. Humidification type did not affect the delivered dose across all device types for standard ventilation. Significant variability in the pMDI dosing was evident, depending on the timing of actuation and the adapter type used. pMDI actuation synchronised with inspiration resulted in a higher delivered drug dose. The type of adapter used for pMDI actuation influenced drug delivery, with the highest dose observed using the CombiHaler.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34683867</pmid><doi>10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-0667</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-2132</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-1607</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5434-1260</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1999-4923
ispartof Pharmaceutics, 2021-09, Vol.13 (10), p.1574
issn 1999-4923
1999-4923
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e3314a5e438549f992abf1a06527940c
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects adapter
aerosol
Aerosols
Caregivers
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Disease transmission
Drug delivery systems
Drug dosages
Efficiency
jet nebuliser
Pandemics
Patients
pressurised metered-dose inhaler
Recovery (Medical)
spacer
Ventilators
vibrating mesh nebuliser
title Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery Options during Adult Mechanical Ventilation in the COVID-19 Era
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A41%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Aerosol%20Drug%20Delivery%20Options%20during%20Adult%20Mechanical%20Ventilation%20in%20the%20COVID-19%20Era&rft.jtitle=Pharmaceutics&rft.au=Naughton,%20Piers%20J.&rft.date=2021-09-28&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1574&rft.pages=1574-&rft.issn=1999-4923&rft.eissn=1999-4923&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2584787826%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-caf09855a04b4e0a0affc79db3aebcbcaf5674496225e37eb0aa2130d11bb6af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584463082&rft_id=info:pmid/34683867&rfr_iscdi=true