Allergological study in patients vaccinated against COVID-19 with suspected allergic reactions

• Published in: Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology asthma, and clinical immunology, 2022-05, Vol.18 (1), p.43-43, Article 43
• Main Authors: Jover Cerdá, Vicente, Rodríguez Pacheco, Ramón, Doménech Witek, Joan, Alonso Hernández, Sonia, Durán García, Rafael, Real Panisello, Marina, Marco de la Calle, Francisco Manuel
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Allergic reaction; Allergy; Anaphylaxis; Basophil activation test; Biopsy; Coronaviruses; COVID-19 vaccines; Disease transmission; Drug dosages; Ethics; Excipient allergy; Food allergies; Health aspects; Hypersensitivity; Immunology; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Patients; Polyethylene glycol; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Skin; Testing; Vaccination
• ISSN: 1710-1484; 1710-1492; 1710-1492
• DOI: 10.1186/s13223-022-00685-z

One of the main barriers to vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is the fear of developing hypersensitivity reactions to any of its components. Although these reactions are very rare, it is necessary to establish an effective protocol to detect patients at risk of developing them. The aim of this study was to evaluate hypersensitivity reactions in vaccinated patients in order to allow or not to complete the vaccination protocol. Descriptive and cross-sectional study in which patients with suspected hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were evaluated. All patients underwent skin prick test (SPT) and/or intradermal test (IDT) with the vaccines and their excipients. In patients with positive IDT with the vaccine, a histopathological and immunohistochemical study was performed by skin biopsy. A basophil activation test (BAT) and a lymphoblastic transformation test (LTT) were also performed. Sixteen patients with suspected hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (12 received Comirnaty , 3 received Vaxzevria , and 1 received Spikevax ) were evaluated. Half had immediate hypersensitivity reactions and half had delayed reactions. All SPTs to excipients and vaccines were negative. IDTs with all excipients were negative. IDTs with vaccines were positive in 11 patients and negative in 5. The histological and immunohistochemical study of the two selected patients with positive IDT with vaccine showed T-lymphocyte involvement. BAT and LTT were negative in both cases. The vaccination protocol could be completed in 7 of 16 patients (44%) studied. The remaining 9 patients did not receive the second dose: 5 because vaccination was not required and 4 because they refused to be vaccinated. Thanks to the allergological and immunohistochemical study, the vaccination protocol could be completed in about half of the patients who presented suspected hypersensitivity reactions to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. IDTs with vaccines could be a valuable method for assessing the immunogenicity of the vaccines.