Wheeze and cough measurements at night in children with respiratory symptoms

• Published in: BMC pediatrics 2020-12, Vol.20 (1), p.556-556, Article 556
• Main Authors: Lindenhofer, Markus, Roth, Lena, Mädel, Clemens, Götzinger, Florian, Kainz, Katharina, Lex, Christiane, Frischer, Thomas, Reinweber, Matthias, Zacharasiewicz, Angela
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Asthma; Asthma - diagnosis; Automation; Child; Children; Cough; Cough - diagnosis; Cough - etiology; Cough monitor; COVID-19; Cystic Fibrosis; Diagnosis; Disease; Evaluation; Humans; Nocturnal symptoms; Parents & parenting; Patients; Pediatric research; Pediatric respiratory diseases; Pediatrics; Pneumonia; Pulmonary manifestations of general diseases; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Respiratory organs; Respiratory Sounds - diagnosis; Sound; Sounds; Staphylococcus infections; Surveys and Questionnaires; Wheeze
• ISSN: 1471-2431; 1471-2431
• DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02455-5

Nocturnal cough and wheeze are important symptoms when diagnosing any respiratory disease in a child, but objective measurements of these symptoms are not performed. The aim of our study was to analyze the use of an automated detection system to assess breath sounds objectively in comparison to cough and wheeze questionnaires and to evaluate its feasibility in clinical practice. Forty-nine recordings of thirty-nine children were processed (asthma n = 13; cystic fibrosis n = 2; pneumonia n = 5; suspicion of habit cough n = 7; prolonged, recurrent or chronic cough n = 13), and cough and asthma scores were compared to the objective nocturnal recordings. Time for audio-validation of recordings took between 2 and 40 min (mean: 14.22 min, (SD): 10.72). Accuracy of the automated measurement was higher for cough than for wheezing sounds. Nocturnal cough readings but not wheeze readings correlated with some of the corresponding scores. To our knowledge this is the first study using a new device to assess nocturnal cough and obstructive breath sounds objectively in children with a wide variety of respiratory diseases. The assessment proved user friendly. We obtained additional information on nighttime symptoms, which would otherwise have remained obscure. Further studies to assess possible diagnostic and therapeutic benefits of this device are needed.