The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial

The study carries the aim to compare the clinical efficacy and economic outcomes of using barbed suture closure versus conventional closure for wounds after posterior long-segment lumbar surgery. One hundred and eighty-one patients undertaking posterior long-segment lumbar surgery participated in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2022-05, Vol.17 (1), p.279-279, Article 279
Main Authors: Shi, Kai, Chen, Xuanwei, Shen, Bin, Luo, Yue, Lin, Renqin, Huang, Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Back surgery
Barbed suture
Clinical trials
Dehiscence
Diabetes
Health aspects
Hospital costs
Humans
Infection
Infections
Length of Stay
Lumbar surgery
Orthopedics
Prospective Studies
Randomized controlled trial
Surgery
Suture Techniques
Sutures
Treatment Outcome
Variables
Wound closure
Wounds
Wounds and injuries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-c4af96d29492b06fb6173992dc30ee946b87516659b3a40fd7ed8236c57958763
container_end_page 279
container_issue 1
container_start_page 279
container_title Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
container_volume 17
creator Shi, Kai
Chen, Xuanwei
Shen, Bin
Luo, Yue
Lin, Renqin
Huang, Yu
description The study carries the aim to compare the clinical efficacy and economic outcomes of using barbed suture closure versus conventional closure for wounds after posterior long-segment lumbar surgery. One hundred and eighty-one patients undertaking posterior long-segment lumbar surgery participated in the prospective randomized controlled trial study to receive either barbed suture wound closure (n = 91) or conventional suture closure (n = 90). Outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), wound closure time, length of incision, length of hospital stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rates, wound complications of dehiscence and infection, and costs. Barbed suture group was related with significantly lower ORT (P = 0.036), wound closure time (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13018-022-03165-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e453474d694a4057be3d9a70bfa4e94b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A704292060</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e453474d694a4057be3d9a70bfa4e94b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A704292060</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-c4af96d29492b06fb6173992dc30ee946b87516659b3a40fd7ed8236c57958763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkk1vFSEUhidGY2v1D7gwJG66GeWbwYVJ0_jRpImbmrgjDJyZzpWBK8w0qb9e7r21ti4IJ_DyHF54m-Y1we8I6eT7QhgmXYspbTEjUrTqSXNMFNet0vrH0wf1UfOilA3GAouOP2-OmBCdqOO42V5dA1oLoDSgmG4goJ8xLQFKQb3NPXhU1mXNUNAU0TaVBfKUMgopjm2BcYa4oLDOVVuFeYR8-wFZlG30aZ5-1-MuxSWnEGq55MmGl82zwYYCr-7mk-b7509X51_by29fLs7PLlvHNFat43bQ0lPNNe2xHHpJFNOaescwgOay75QgUgrdM8vx4BX4jjLphNKiU5KdNBcHrk92Y7Z5mm2-NclOZr-Q8mhsXiYXwAAXjCvupeYVJVQPzGurcD9YXlv1lfXxwNqu_QzeVdPZhkfQxztxujZjujG6_pPoWAWc3gFy-rVCWcw8FQch2AhpLYZKKatrQmmVvv1PuklrjvWp9iohOcfqn2q01cAUh1T7uh3UnCnMqaZY4qqiB5XLqZQMw_2VCTa7CJlDhEyNkNlHyOzQbx6avT_yNzPsD7VcweE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666564407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Shi, Kai ; Chen, Xuanwei ; Shen, Bin ; Luo, Yue ; Lin, Renqin ; Huang, Yu</creator><creatorcontrib>Shi, Kai ; Chen, Xuanwei ; Shen, Bin ; Luo, Yue ; Lin, Renqin ; Huang, Yu</creatorcontrib><description>The study carries the aim to compare the clinical efficacy and economic outcomes of using barbed suture closure versus conventional closure for wounds after posterior long-segment lumbar surgery. One hundred and eighty-one patients undertaking posterior long-segment lumbar surgery participated in the prospective randomized controlled trial study to receive either barbed suture wound closure (n = 91) or conventional suture closure (n = 90). Outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), wound closure time, length of incision, length of hospital stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rates, wound complications of dehiscence and infection, and costs. Barbed suture group was related with significantly lower ORT (P = 0.036), wound closure time (P &lt; 0.001) and average wound closure time (P &lt; 0.001), and significantly lower wound complication rates (dehiscence and infection) (P = 0.031). No significant differences were found when compared with conventional suture group in terms of length of incision (P = 0.086), length of hospital stay (P = 0.174), readmission rates up to 90 days after the surgical procedure (P = 0.232) and costs (P = 0.205). The study suggested the knotless barbed suture technique outperformed the conventional suture in shortening operating room time, wound closure time and average wound closure time, and reducing wound complication rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-799X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-799X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03165-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35585558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Back surgery ; Barbed suture ; Clinical trials ; Dehiscence ; Diabetes ; Health aspects ; Hospital costs ; Humans ; Infection ; Infections ; Length of Stay ; Lumbar surgery ; Orthopedics ; Prospective Studies ; Randomized controlled trial ; Surgery ; Suture Techniques ; Sutures ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables ; Wound closure ; Wounds ; Wounds and injuries</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022-05, Vol.17 (1), p.279-279, Article 279</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-c4af96d29492b06fb6173992dc30ee946b87516659b3a40fd7ed8236c57958763</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6233-7328 ; 0000-0003-4564-6609</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118583/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666564407?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25730,27900,27901,36988,36989,44565,53765,53767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35585558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shi, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xuanwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Renqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yu</creatorcontrib><title>The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</title><addtitle>J Orthop Surg Res</addtitle><description>The study carries the aim to compare the clinical efficacy and economic outcomes of using barbed suture closure versus conventional closure for wounds after posterior long-segment lumbar surgery. One hundred and eighty-one patients undertaking posterior long-segment lumbar surgery participated in the prospective randomized controlled trial study to receive either barbed suture wound closure (n = 91) or conventional suture closure (n = 90). Outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), wound closure time, length of incision, length of hospital stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rates, wound complications of dehiscence and infection, and costs. Barbed suture group was related with significantly lower ORT (P = 0.036), wound closure time (P &lt; 0.001) and average wound closure time (P &lt; 0.001), and significantly lower wound complication rates (dehiscence and infection) (P = 0.031). No significant differences were found when compared with conventional suture group in terms of length of incision (P = 0.086), length of hospital stay (P = 0.174), readmission rates up to 90 days after the surgical procedure (P = 0.232) and costs (P = 0.205). The study suggested the knotless barbed suture technique outperformed the conventional suture in shortening operating room time, wound closure time and average wound closure time, and reducing wound complication rates.</description><subject>Back surgery</subject><subject>Barbed suture</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dehiscence</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospital costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Lumbar surgery</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>Wound closure</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><subject>Wounds and injuries</subject><issn>1749-799X</issn><issn>1749-799X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkk1vFSEUhidGY2v1D7gwJG66GeWbwYVJ0_jRpImbmrgjDJyZzpWBK8w0qb9e7r21ti4IJ_DyHF54m-Y1we8I6eT7QhgmXYspbTEjUrTqSXNMFNet0vrH0wf1UfOilA3GAouOP2-OmBCdqOO42V5dA1oLoDSgmG4goJ8xLQFKQb3NPXhU1mXNUNAU0TaVBfKUMgopjm2BcYa4oLDOVVuFeYR8-wFZlG30aZ5-1-MuxSWnEGq55MmGl82zwYYCr-7mk-b7509X51_by29fLs7PLlvHNFat43bQ0lPNNe2xHHpJFNOaescwgOay75QgUgrdM8vx4BX4jjLphNKiU5KdNBcHrk92Y7Z5mm2-NclOZr-Q8mhsXiYXwAAXjCvupeYVJVQPzGurcD9YXlv1lfXxwNqu_QzeVdPZhkfQxztxujZjujG6_pPoWAWc3gFy-rVCWcw8FQch2AhpLYZKKatrQmmVvv1PuklrjvWp9iohOcfqn2q01cAUh1T7uh3UnCnMqaZY4qqiB5XLqZQMw_2VCTa7CJlDhEyNkNlHyOzQbx6avT_yNzPsD7VcweE</recordid><startdate>20220518</startdate><enddate>20220518</enddate><creator>Shi, Kai</creator><creator>Chen, Xuanwei</creator><creator>Shen, Bin</creator><creator>Luo, Yue</creator><creator>Lin, Renqin</creator><creator>Huang, Yu</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-7328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-6609</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220518</creationdate><title>The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial</title><author>Shi, Kai ; Chen, Xuanwei ; Shen, Bin ; Luo, Yue ; Lin, Renqin ; Huang, Yu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-c4af96d29492b06fb6173992dc30ee946b87516659b3a40fd7ed8236c57958763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Back surgery</topic><topic>Barbed suture</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dehiscence</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospital costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Lumbar surgery</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>Wound closure</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><topic>Wounds and injuries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shi, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xuanwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Renqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shi, Kai</au><au>Chen, Xuanwei</au><au>Shen, Bin</au><au>Luo, Yue</au><au>Lin, Renqin</au><au>Huang, Yu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Surg Res</addtitle><date>2022-05-18</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>279-279</pages><artnum>279</artnum><issn>1749-799X</issn><eissn>1749-799X</eissn><abstract>The study carries the aim to compare the clinical efficacy and economic outcomes of using barbed suture closure versus conventional closure for wounds after posterior long-segment lumbar surgery. One hundred and eighty-one patients undertaking posterior long-segment lumbar surgery participated in the prospective randomized controlled trial study to receive either barbed suture wound closure (n = 91) or conventional suture closure (n = 90). Outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), wound closure time, length of incision, length of hospital stay (LOS), 90-day readmission rates, wound complications of dehiscence and infection, and costs. Barbed suture group was related with significantly lower ORT (P = 0.036), wound closure time (P &lt; 0.001) and average wound closure time (P &lt; 0.001), and significantly lower wound complication rates (dehiscence and infection) (P = 0.031). No significant differences were found when compared with conventional suture group in terms of length of incision (P = 0.086), length of hospital stay (P = 0.174), readmission rates up to 90 days after the surgical procedure (P = 0.232) and costs (P = 0.205). The study suggested the knotless barbed suture technique outperformed the conventional suture in shortening operating room time, wound closure time and average wound closure time, and reducing wound complication rates.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35585558</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13018-022-03165-7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6233-7328</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-6609</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-799X
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2022-05, Vol.17 (1), p.279-279, Article 279
issn 1749-799X
1749-799X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e453474d694a4057be3d9a70bfa4e94b
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Back surgery
Barbed suture
Clinical trials
Dehiscence
Diabetes
Health aspects
Hospital costs
Humans
Infection
Infections
Length of Stay
Lumbar surgery
Orthopedics
Prospective Studies
Randomized controlled trial
Surgery
Suture Techniques
Sutures
Treatment Outcome
Variables
Wound closure
Wounds
Wounds and injuries
title The use of novel knotless barbed sutures in posterior long-segment lumbar surgery: a randomized controlled trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T23%3A31%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20novel%20knotless%20barbed%20sutures%20in%20posterior%20long-segment%20lumbar%20surgery:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20and%20research&rft.au=Shi,%20Kai&rft.date=2022-05-18&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=279-279&rft.artnum=279&rft.issn=1749-799X&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13018-022-03165-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA704292060%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-c4af96d29492b06fb6173992dc30ee946b87516659b3a40fd7ed8236c57958763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666564407&rft_id=info:pmid/35585558&rft_galeid=A704292060&rfr_iscdi=true