Loading…

Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments

The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by clas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5127
Main Authors: Simoniello, Tiziana, Coluzzi, Rosa, Guariglia, Annibale, Imbrenda, Vito, Lanfredi, Maria, Samela, Caterina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73
container_end_page
container_issue 20
container_start_page 5127
container_title Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)
container_volume 14
creator Simoniello, Tiziana
Coluzzi, Rosa
Guariglia, Annibale
Imbrenda, Vito
Lanfredi, Maria
Samela, Caterina
description The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (>10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (
doi_str_mv 10.3390/rs14205127
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e46c49a8552949649a184c7e2c0cb798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e46c49a8552949649a184c7e2c0cb798</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2728527305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQDaJgqb34CwLehNV87SY5lrXVQsFD9Ryy2WxN2U1qsqv037u1os7lPWYeb2Z4AFxjdEepRPcxYUZQjgk_AxOCOMkYkeT8H78Es5R2aCxKsURsArr50IdO987ApWt7G53fQu1rWLY6Jdc4M86Ch6GB6_CZPVifXH-AcxerEL2Fa51shBujvR-xbMNQJ-g83LzFoWqPRgv_4WLwnfV9ugIXjW6Tnf3gFLwuFy_lU7Z-flyV83VmiMR9xnFdIy6x4YTZ3DYV4ZpXtqpFQ60xWtao0LIxvBJGF0ILzKgwtJAV5wxbTqdgdfKtg96pfXSdjgcVtFPfjRC3Ssfx59YqywrDpBZ5TiSTxUixYIZbYpCpuBSj183Jax_D-2BTr3ZhiH48XxFORE44Rfmouj2pTAwpRdv8bsVIHdNRf-nQLweYgkE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728527305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Simoniello, Tiziana ; Coluzzi, Rosa ; Guariglia, Annibale ; Imbrenda, Vito ; Lanfredi, Maria ; Samela, Caterina</creator><creatorcontrib>Simoniello, Tiziana ; Coluzzi, Rosa ; Guariglia, Annibale ; Imbrenda, Vito ; Lanfredi, Maria ; Samela, Caterina</creatorcontrib><description>The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (&gt;10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (&lt;1.5 pts/m2). The easiness of the approach also makes it implementable in an operative context for a non-full expert in LiDAR data classification, and it is suitable for the great wealth of large-scale acquisitions carried out in the past by using monowavelength NIR laser scanners with a small footprint configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs14205127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; airborne laser scanner ; Airborne lasers ; balanced accuracy ; Biodiversity ; Bushes ; Classification ; Climate change ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Density ; Evaluation ; full waveform ; Laser applications ; Lasers ; Lidar ; Morphology ; point cloud classification ; raw intensity data ; Remote sensing ; Rocks ; Scanners ; Shrublands ; Shrubs ; Unevenness ; Vector quantization ; Vegetation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5127</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0420-082X ; 0000-0002-1846-7704 ; 0000-0002-4287-2400 ; 0000-0003-3364-4083</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728527305/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728527305?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simoniello, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coluzzi, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guariglia, Annibale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbrenda, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanfredi, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samela, Caterina</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (&gt;10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (&lt;1.5 pts/m2). The easiness of the approach also makes it implementable in an operative context for a non-full expert in LiDAR data classification, and it is suitable for the great wealth of large-scale acquisitions carried out in the past by using monowavelength NIR laser scanners with a small footprint configuration.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>airborne laser scanner</subject><subject>Airborne lasers</subject><subject>balanced accuracy</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bushes</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>full waveform</subject><subject>Laser applications</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>point cloud classification</subject><subject>raw intensity data</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Unevenness</subject><subject>Vector quantization</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQDaJgqb34CwLehNV87SY5lrXVQsFD9Ryy2WxN2U1qsqv037u1os7lPWYeb2Z4AFxjdEepRPcxYUZQjgk_AxOCOMkYkeT8H78Es5R2aCxKsURsArr50IdO987ApWt7G53fQu1rWLY6Jdc4M86Ch6GB6_CZPVifXH-AcxerEL2Fa51shBujvR-xbMNQJ-g83LzFoWqPRgv_4WLwnfV9ugIXjW6Tnf3gFLwuFy_lU7Z-flyV83VmiMR9xnFdIy6x4YTZ3DYV4ZpXtqpFQ60xWtao0LIxvBJGF0ILzKgwtJAV5wxbTqdgdfKtg96pfXSdjgcVtFPfjRC3Ssfx59YqywrDpBZ5TiSTxUixYIZbYpCpuBSj183Jax_D-2BTr3ZhiH48XxFORE44Rfmouj2pTAwpRdv8bsVIHdNRf-nQLweYgkE</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Simoniello, Tiziana</creator><creator>Coluzzi, Rosa</creator><creator>Guariglia, Annibale</creator><creator>Imbrenda, Vito</creator><creator>Lanfredi, Maria</creator><creator>Samela, Caterina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-7704</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-2400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-4083</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</title><author>Simoniello, Tiziana ; Coluzzi, Rosa ; Guariglia, Annibale ; Imbrenda, Vito ; Lanfredi, Maria ; Samela, Caterina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>airborne laser scanner</topic><topic>Airborne lasers</topic><topic>balanced accuracy</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bushes</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>full waveform</topic><topic>Laser applications</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>point cloud classification</topic><topic>raw intensity data</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Unevenness</topic><topic>Vector quantization</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simoniello, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coluzzi, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guariglia, Annibale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbrenda, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanfredi, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samela, Caterina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simoniello, Tiziana</au><au>Coluzzi, Rosa</au><au>Guariglia, Annibale</au><au>Imbrenda, Vito</au><au>Lanfredi, Maria</au><au>Samela, Caterina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>5127</spage><pages>5127-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (&gt;10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (&lt;1.5 pts/m2). The easiness of the approach also makes it implementable in an operative context for a non-full expert in LiDAR data classification, and it is suitable for the great wealth of large-scale acquisitions carried out in the past by using monowavelength NIR laser scanners with a small footprint configuration.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs14205127</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-7704</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-2400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-4083</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-4292
ispartof Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5127
issn 2072-4292
2072-4292
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e46c49a8552949649a184c7e2c0cb798
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
airborne laser scanner
Airborne lasers
balanced accuracy
Biodiversity
Bushes
Classification
Climate change
Cluster analysis
Clustering
Density
Evaluation
full waveform
Laser applications
Lasers
Lidar
Morphology
point cloud classification
raw intensity data
Remote sensing
Rocks
Scanners
Shrublands
Shrubs
Unevenness
Vector quantization
Vegetation
Wildlife conservation
title Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20Filtering%20and%20Classification%20of%20Low-Density%20Airborne%20Laser%20Scanner%20Clouds%20in%20Shrubland%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Simoniello,%20Tiziana&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=5127&rft.pages=5127-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs14205127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2728527305%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728527305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true