Loading…
Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments
The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by clas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5127 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 5127 |
container_title | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland) |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Simoniello, Tiziana Coluzzi, Rosa Guariglia, Annibale Imbrenda, Vito Lanfredi, Maria Samela, Caterina |
description | The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (>10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rs14205127 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e46c49a8552949649a184c7e2c0cb798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e46c49a8552949649a184c7e2c0cb798</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2728527305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQDaJgqb34CwLehNV87SY5lrXVQsFD9Ryy2WxN2U1qsqv037u1os7lPWYeb2Z4AFxjdEepRPcxYUZQjgk_AxOCOMkYkeT8H78Es5R2aCxKsURsArr50IdO987ApWt7G53fQu1rWLY6Jdc4M86Ch6GB6_CZPVifXH-AcxerEL2Fa51shBujvR-xbMNQJ-g83LzFoWqPRgv_4WLwnfV9ugIXjW6Tnf3gFLwuFy_lU7Z-flyV83VmiMR9xnFdIy6x4YTZ3DYV4ZpXtqpFQ60xWtao0LIxvBJGF0ILzKgwtJAV5wxbTqdgdfKtg96pfXSdjgcVtFPfjRC3Ssfx59YqywrDpBZ5TiSTxUixYIZbYpCpuBSj183Jax_D-2BTr3ZhiH48XxFORE44Rfmouj2pTAwpRdv8bsVIHdNRf-nQLweYgkE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728527305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Simoniello, Tiziana ; Coluzzi, Rosa ; Guariglia, Annibale ; Imbrenda, Vito ; Lanfredi, Maria ; Samela, Caterina</creator><creatorcontrib>Simoniello, Tiziana ; Coluzzi, Rosa ; Guariglia, Annibale ; Imbrenda, Vito ; Lanfredi, Maria ; Samela, Caterina</creatorcontrib><description>The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (>10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (<1.5 pts/m2). The easiness of the approach also makes it implementable in an operative context for a non-full expert in LiDAR data classification, and it is suitable for the great wealth of large-scale acquisitions carried out in the past by using monowavelength NIR laser scanners with a small footprint configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-4292</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rs14205127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; airborne laser scanner ; Airborne lasers ; balanced accuracy ; Biodiversity ; Bushes ; Classification ; Climate change ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Density ; Evaluation ; full waveform ; Laser applications ; Lasers ; Lidar ; Morphology ; point cloud classification ; raw intensity data ; Remote sensing ; Rocks ; Scanners ; Shrublands ; Shrubs ; Unevenness ; Vector quantization ; Vegetation ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5127</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0420-082X ; 0000-0002-1846-7704 ; 0000-0002-4287-2400 ; 0000-0003-3364-4083</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728527305/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728527305?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simoniello, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coluzzi, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guariglia, Annibale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbrenda, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanfredi, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samela, Caterina</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</title><title>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</title><description>The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (>10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (<1.5 pts/m2). The easiness of the approach also makes it implementable in an operative context for a non-full expert in LiDAR data classification, and it is suitable for the great wealth of large-scale acquisitions carried out in the past by using monowavelength NIR laser scanners with a small footprint configuration.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>airborne laser scanner</subject><subject>Airborne lasers</subject><subject>balanced accuracy</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bushes</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>full waveform</subject><subject>Laser applications</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>point cloud classification</subject><subject>raw intensity data</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Shrublands</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Unevenness</subject><subject>Vector quantization</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>2072-4292</issn><issn>2072-4292</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUU1LAzEQDaJgqb34CwLehNV87SY5lrXVQsFD9Ryy2WxN2U1qsqv037u1os7lPWYeb2Z4AFxjdEepRPcxYUZQjgk_AxOCOMkYkeT8H78Es5R2aCxKsURsArr50IdO987ApWt7G53fQu1rWLY6Jdc4M86Ch6GB6_CZPVifXH-AcxerEL2Fa51shBujvR-xbMNQJ-g83LzFoWqPRgv_4WLwnfV9ugIXjW6Tnf3gFLwuFy_lU7Z-flyV83VmiMR9xnFdIy6x4YTZ3DYV4ZpXtqpFQ60xWtao0LIxvBJGF0ILzKgwtJAV5wxbTqdgdfKtg96pfXSdjgcVtFPfjRC3Ssfx59YqywrDpBZ5TiSTxUixYIZbYpCpuBSj183Jax_D-2BTr3ZhiH48XxFORE44Rfmouj2pTAwpRdv8bsVIHdNRf-nQLweYgkE</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Simoniello, Tiziana</creator><creator>Coluzzi, Rosa</creator><creator>Guariglia, Annibale</creator><creator>Imbrenda, Vito</creator><creator>Lanfredi, Maria</creator><creator>Samela, Caterina</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-7704</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-2400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-4083</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</title><author>Simoniello, Tiziana ; Coluzzi, Rosa ; Guariglia, Annibale ; Imbrenda, Vito ; Lanfredi, Maria ; Samela, Caterina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>airborne laser scanner</topic><topic>Airborne lasers</topic><topic>balanced accuracy</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bushes</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>full waveform</topic><topic>Laser applications</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>point cloud classification</topic><topic>raw intensity data</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Shrublands</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Unevenness</topic><topic>Vector quantization</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simoniello, Tiziana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coluzzi, Rosa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guariglia, Annibale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imbrenda, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanfredi, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samela, Caterina</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simoniello, Tiziana</au><au>Coluzzi, Rosa</au><au>Guariglia, Annibale</au><au>Imbrenda, Vito</au><au>Lanfredi, Maria</au><au>Samela, Caterina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland)</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>5127</spage><pages>5127-</pages><issn>2072-4292</issn><eissn>2072-4292</eissn><abstract>The monitoring of shrublands plays a fundamental role, from an ecological and climatic point of view, in biodiversity conservation, carbon stock estimates, and climate-change impact assessments. Laser scanning systems have proven to have a high capability in mapping non-herbaceous vegetation by classifying high-density point clouds. On the other hand, the classification of low-density airborne laser scanner (ALS) clouds is largely affected by confusion with rock spikes and boulders having similar heights and shapes. To identify rocks and improve the accuracy of vegetation classes, we implemented an effective and time-saving procedure based on the integration of geometric features with laser intensity segmented by K-means clustering (GIK procedure). The classification accuracy was evaluated, taking into account the data unevenness (small size of rock class vs. vegetation and terrain classes) by estimating the Balanced Accuracy (BA range 89.15–90.37); a comparison with a standard geometry-based procedure showed an increase in accuracy of about 27%. The classical overall accuracy is generally very high for all the classifications: the average is 92.7 for geometry-based and 94.9 for GIK. At class level, the precision (user’s accuracy) for vegetation classes is very high (on average, 92.6% for shrubs and 99% for bushes) with a relative increase for shrubs up to 20% (>10% when rocks occupy more than 8% of the scene). Less pronounced differences were found for bushes (maximum 4.13%). The precision of rock class is quite acceptable (about 64%), compared to the complete absence of detection of the geometric procedure. We also evaluated how point cloud density affects the proposed procedure and found that the increase in shrub precision is also preserved for ALS clouds with very low point density (<1.5 pts/m2). The easiness of the approach also makes it implementable in an operative context for a non-full expert in LiDAR data classification, and it is suitable for the great wealth of large-scale acquisitions carried out in the past by using monowavelength NIR laser scanners with a small footprint configuration.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rs14205127</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0420-082X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1846-7704</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4287-2400</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3364-4083</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-4292 |
ispartof | Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-10, Vol.14 (20), p.5127 |
issn | 2072-4292 2072-4292 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e46c49a8552949649a184c7e2c0cb798 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accuracy airborne laser scanner Airborne lasers balanced accuracy Biodiversity Bushes Classification Climate change Cluster analysis Clustering Density Evaluation full waveform Laser applications Lasers Lidar Morphology point cloud classification raw intensity data Remote sensing Rocks Scanners Shrublands Shrubs Unevenness Vector quantization Vegetation Wildlife conservation |
title | Automatic Filtering and Classification of Low-Density Airborne Laser Scanner Clouds in Shrubland Environments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T13%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20Filtering%20and%20Classification%20of%20Low-Density%20Airborne%20Laser%20Scanner%20Clouds%20in%20Shrubland%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20(Basel,%20Switzerland)&rft.au=Simoniello,%20Tiziana&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=5127&rft.pages=5127-&rft.issn=2072-4292&rft.eissn=2072-4292&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rs14205127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2728527305%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-71dd0791c724e5efb27a7bebd8f3ecca9d06a9fc7b8ca68a81438c369b7741e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728527305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |