Ultrasonic reflection coefficient and surface roughness index of OA articular cartilage: relation to pathological assessment

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders 2012-03, Vol.13 (1), p.34-34, Article 34
• Main Authors: Niu, Hai-jun, Wang, Qing, Wang, Yue-xiang, Li, De-yu, Fan, Yu-bo, Chen, Wu-fan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Animals; Cartilage; Cartilage, Articular - diagnostic imaging; Cartilage, Articular - pathology; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic; Disease Models, Animal; Early Diagnosis; Female; High-frequency ultrasound; Knee; Knee Joint - diagnostic imaging; Knee Joint - pathology; Medical research; Microscopy, Acoustic; Musculoskeletal diseases; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging; Osteoarthritis, Knee - pathology; Predictive Value of Tests; Rabbits; Severity of Illness Index; Studies; Surface Properties; Ultrasound reflection coefficient; Ultrasound roughness index
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-34

Early diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) is essential for preventing further cartilage destruction and decreasing severe complications. The aims of this study are to explore the relationship between OA pathological grades and quantitative acoustic parameters and to provide more objective criteria for ultrasonic microscopic evaluation of the OA cartilage. Articular cartilage samples were prepared from rabbit knees and scanned using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Three quantitative parameters, including the roughness index of the cartilage surface (URI), the reflection coefficients from the cartilage surface (R) and from the cartilage-bone interface (Rbone) were extracted. The osteoarthritis grades of these cartilage samples were qualitatively assessed by histology according to the grading standards of International Osteoarthritis Institute (OARSI). The relationship between these quantitative parameters and the osteoarthritis grades was explored. The results showed that URI increased with the OA grade. URI of the normal cartilage samples was significantly lower than the one of the OA cartilage samples. There was no significant difference in URI between the grade 1 cartilage samples and the grade 2 cartilage samples. The reflection coefficient of the cartilage surface reduced significantly with the development of OA (p < 0.05), while the reflection coefficient of the cartilage-bone interface increased with the increase of grade. High frequency ultrasound measurements can reflect the changes in the surface roughness index and the ultrasound reflection coefficients of the cartilage samples with different OA grades. This study may provide useful information for the quantitative ultrasonic diagnosis of early OA.