Loading…

Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials

•Minocycline–EDTA lock solution seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related bloodstream infections and exit-site infections.•Cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.•Future research should focus on new catheter lock solutions and cost-effectiveness...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of infectious diseases 2019-10, Vol.87, p.154-165
Main Authors: Dang, Fang-Ping, Li, Hui-Ju, Wang, Rui-Juan, Wu, Qi, Chen, Hui, Ren, Jing-Jie, Tian, Jin-Hui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13
container_end_page 165
container_issue
container_start_page 154
container_title International journal of infectious diseases
container_volume 87
creator Dang, Fang-Ping
Li, Hui-Ju
Wang, Rui-Juan
Wu, Qi
Chen, Hui
Ren, Jing-Jie
Tian, Jin-Hui
description •Minocycline–EDTA lock solution seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related bloodstream infections and exit-site infections.•Cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.•Future research should focus on new catheter lock solutions and cost-effectiveness analysis. It remains uncertain which catheter lock solution (CLS) to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) works best and is safest for patients. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of different CLSs for the prevention of CRBSI and ranked these CLSs for practical consideration. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases, earlier relevant meta-analyses, and the reference lists of included studies were searched. The primary outcome was CRBSI; secondary outcomes were catheter-related thrombosis and exit-site infections. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 52 randomized controlled trials involving 9099 patients and evaluating 13 CLSs (single and combinations) were included. With regard to the quality of the evidence, the risk of bias was typically low or unclear (45 out of 52 trials, 86.5%). In the network meta-analysis, saline (OR 8.44, 95% CI 2.19–32.46), gentamicin+citrate (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.32–6.42), ethanol (OR 5.33, 95% CI 1.22–23.32), and cloxacillin+heparin (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.19–5.49) were associated with a greater effect on CRBSI than heparin. This network meta-analysis showed that minocycline–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) seemed to be the most effective for the prevention of CRBSI and exit-site infection, and cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.017
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4d51313b0c042b39cfbfaf0c4a05752</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1201971219303431</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e4d51313b0c042b39cfbfaf0c4a05752</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2300192182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UstuFDEQHCEQCYEf4IB85DKLX_NCXKIVkEiRuMDZ6vG0gzee8WJ7Fy2fx5fRm01y5NQtu7r6UVVVbwVfCS7aD5uV3_hpJbkYVrxfcdE9q85F3_W1aoR4Tjl91UMn5Fn1KucN51y3bf-yOlNCa9nK7rz6u47zFhIUv0eGznkL9sCiY3tIPu4yg6X42dsURw-BhWjvWI5hV3xcMnMxsW3CPRJouWUWyk8smOqEAQpObAwxTrkkhJn5xaG9L_vILtmC5XdMd2zGAjUsEA7Z52PfgQ8D29I8xEkNUpxZI1mCZYqz_0OcNi4lxRAoLYlmyq-rF44CvnmIF9WPL5-_r6_qm29fr9eXN7WlrUutUTntGoSxRz3C2Oq-s4o7NQk5tHak5x5brrt20LIbpOrkMCnRQNNqjU6oi-r6xDtF2Jht8jOkg4ngzf1DTLcGUvE2oEE9NUIJNXLLtRzVYN3owHGrgTddI4nr_Ylrm-KvHeZiZp8thgAL0tWNVJxUlaI_QuUJShrknNA9tRbcHH1gNuboA3P0geG9IR9Q0bsH_t044_RU8ig8AT6dAEgX23tMJls6ucXJJ5KJVvL_4_8HZo_Icw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2300192182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials</title><source>BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS</source><source>ScienceDirect®</source><creator>Dang, Fang-Ping ; Li, Hui-Ju ; Wang, Rui-Juan ; Wu, Qi ; Chen, Hui ; Ren, Jing-Jie ; Tian, Jin-Hui</creator><creatorcontrib>Dang, Fang-Ping ; Li, Hui-Ju ; Wang, Rui-Juan ; Wu, Qi ; Chen, Hui ; Ren, Jing-Jie ; Tian, Jin-Hui</creatorcontrib><description>•Minocycline–EDTA lock solution seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related bloodstream infections and exit-site infections.•Cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.•Future research should focus on new catheter lock solutions and cost-effectiveness analysis. It remains uncertain which catheter lock solution (CLS) to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) works best and is safest for patients. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of different CLSs for the prevention of CRBSI and ranked these CLSs for practical consideration. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases, earlier relevant meta-analyses, and the reference lists of included studies were searched. The primary outcome was CRBSI; secondary outcomes were catheter-related thrombosis and exit-site infections. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 52 randomized controlled trials involving 9099 patients and evaluating 13 CLSs (single and combinations) were included. With regard to the quality of the evidence, the risk of bias was typically low or unclear (45 out of 52 trials, 86.5%). In the network meta-analysis, saline (OR 8.44, 95% CI 2.19–32.46), gentamicin+citrate (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.32–6.42), ethanol (OR 5.33, 95% CI 1.22–23.32), and cloxacillin+heparin (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.19–5.49) were associated with a greater effect on CRBSI than heparin. This network meta-analysis showed that minocycline–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) seemed to be the most effective for the prevention of CRBSI and exit-site infection, and cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1201-9712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3511</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31442627</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Bacteremia - prevention &amp; control ; Catheter lock solutions ; Catheter-related bloodstream infections ; Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control ; Humans ; Network Meta-Analysis ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><ispartof>International journal of infectious diseases, 2019-10, Vol.87, p.154-165</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5697-3587</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971219303431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31442627$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dang, Fang-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rui-Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Jing-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jin-Hui</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials</title><title>International journal of infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Int J Infect Dis</addtitle><description>•Minocycline–EDTA lock solution seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related bloodstream infections and exit-site infections.•Cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.•Future research should focus on new catheter lock solutions and cost-effectiveness analysis. It remains uncertain which catheter lock solution (CLS) to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) works best and is safest for patients. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of different CLSs for the prevention of CRBSI and ranked these CLSs for practical consideration. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases, earlier relevant meta-analyses, and the reference lists of included studies were searched. The primary outcome was CRBSI; secondary outcomes were catheter-related thrombosis and exit-site infections. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 52 randomized controlled trials involving 9099 patients and evaluating 13 CLSs (single and combinations) were included. With regard to the quality of the evidence, the risk of bias was typically low or unclear (45 out of 52 trials, 86.5%). In the network meta-analysis, saline (OR 8.44, 95% CI 2.19–32.46), gentamicin+citrate (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.32–6.42), ethanol (OR 5.33, 95% CI 1.22–23.32), and cloxacillin+heparin (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.19–5.49) were associated with a greater effect on CRBSI than heparin. This network meta-analysis showed that minocycline–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) seemed to be the most effective for the prevention of CRBSI and exit-site infection, and cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.</description><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bacteremia - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Catheter lock solutions</subject><subject>Catheter-related bloodstream infections</subject><subject>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Network Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><issn>1201-9712</issn><issn>1878-3511</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UstuFDEQHCEQCYEf4IB85DKLX_NCXKIVkEiRuMDZ6vG0gzee8WJ7Fy2fx5fRm01y5NQtu7r6UVVVbwVfCS7aD5uV3_hpJbkYVrxfcdE9q85F3_W1aoR4Tjl91UMn5Fn1KucN51y3bf-yOlNCa9nK7rz6u47zFhIUv0eGznkL9sCiY3tIPu4yg6X42dsURw-BhWjvWI5hV3xcMnMxsW3CPRJouWUWyk8smOqEAQpObAwxTrkkhJn5xaG9L_vILtmC5XdMd2zGAjUsEA7Z52PfgQ8D29I8xEkNUpxZI1mCZYqz_0OcNi4lxRAoLYlmyq-rF44CvnmIF9WPL5-_r6_qm29fr9eXN7WlrUutUTntGoSxRz3C2Oq-s4o7NQk5tHak5x5brrt20LIbpOrkMCnRQNNqjU6oi-r6xDtF2Jht8jOkg4ngzf1DTLcGUvE2oEE9NUIJNXLLtRzVYN3owHGrgTddI4nr_Ylrm-KvHeZiZp8thgAL0tWNVJxUlaI_QuUJShrknNA9tRbcHH1gNuboA3P0geG9IR9Q0bsH_t044_RU8ig8AT6dAEgX23tMJls6ucXJJ5KJVvL_4_8HZo_Icw</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Dang, Fang-Ping</creator><creator>Li, Hui-Ju</creator><creator>Wang, Rui-Juan</creator><creator>Wu, Qi</creator><creator>Chen, Hui</creator><creator>Ren, Jing-Jie</creator><creator>Tian, Jin-Hui</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-3587</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials</title><author>Dang, Fang-Ping ; Li, Hui-Ju ; Wang, Rui-Juan ; Wu, Qi ; Chen, Hui ; Ren, Jing-Jie ; Tian, Jin-Hui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bacteremia - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Catheter lock solutions</topic><topic>Catheter-related bloodstream infections</topic><topic>Catheter-Related Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Network Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dang, Fang-Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Rui-Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Jing-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Jin-Hui</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dang, Fang-Ping</au><au>Li, Hui-Ju</au><au>Wang, Rui-Juan</au><au>Wu, Qi</au><au>Chen, Hui</au><au>Ren, Jing-Jie</au><au>Tian, Jin-Hui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials</atitle><jtitle>International journal of infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>154</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>154-165</pages><issn>1201-9712</issn><eissn>1878-3511</eissn><abstract>•Minocycline–EDTA lock solution seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related bloodstream infections and exit-site infections.•Cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.•Future research should focus on new catheter lock solutions and cost-effectiveness analysis. It remains uncertain which catheter lock solution (CLS) to prevent catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) works best and is safest for patients. This study was performed to compare the efficacy of different CLSs for the prevention of CRBSI and ranked these CLSs for practical consideration. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MEDLINE databases, earlier relevant meta-analyses, and the reference lists of included studies were searched. The primary outcome was CRBSI; secondary outcomes were catheter-related thrombosis and exit-site infections. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 52 randomized controlled trials involving 9099 patients and evaluating 13 CLSs (single and combinations) were included. With regard to the quality of the evidence, the risk of bias was typically low or unclear (45 out of 52 trials, 86.5%). In the network meta-analysis, saline (OR 8.44, 95% CI 2.19–32.46), gentamicin+citrate (OR 2.92, 95% CI 1.32–6.42), ethanol (OR 5.33, 95% CI 1.22–23.32), and cloxacillin+heparin (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.19–5.49) were associated with a greater effect on CRBSI than heparin. This network meta-analysis showed that minocycline–ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) seemed to be the most effective for the prevention of CRBSI and exit-site infection, and cefotaxime+heparin seemed to be the most effective for catheter-related thrombosis.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31442627</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.017</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5697-3587</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1201-9712
ispartof International journal of infectious diseases, 2019-10, Vol.87, p.154-165
issn 1201-9712
1878-3511
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4d51313b0c042b39cfbfaf0c4a05752
source BACON - Elsevier - GLOBAL_SCIENCEDIRECT-OPENACCESS; ScienceDirect®
subjects Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Bacteremia - prevention & control
Catheter lock solutions
Catheter-related bloodstream infections
Catheter-Related Infections - prevention & control
Humans
Network Meta-Analysis
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
title Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A06%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20efficacy%20of%20various%20antimicrobial%20lock%20solutions%20for%20preventing%20catheter-related%20bloodstream%20infections:%20A%20network%20meta-analysis%20of%209099%20patients%20from%2052%20randomized%20controlled%20trials&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=Dang,%20Fang-Ping&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=154-165&rft.issn=1201-9712&rft.eissn=1878-3511&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijid.2019.08.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2300192182%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-4e3f4f5eab8e4bab6487c30f3d1296cbb8e8e604769427923729d315a5644ef13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2300192182&rft_id=info:pmid/31442627&rfr_iscdi=true