Loading…

Twitter, partisan use and institutional use: Comparative analysis between the profiles of Moncloa, Madrid City Council and their ruling parties

This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communication & Society 2019-03, Vol.32 (1), p.19-36
Main Authors: Aitor González-Bengoechea, Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz, María-Luisa García-Guardia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 36
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Communication & Society
container_volume 32
creator Aitor González-Bengoechea
Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz
María-Luisa García-Guardia
description This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analyses three different periods in the electoral process: the pre-campaign, campaign and post-campaign during the Spanish general elections of December 20th, 2015 in order to see if the election periods caused changes in their communications on Twitter. The sample consists of four cases divided into two groups for content analysis. On one hand, the Government’s Twitter profile (@desdelamoncloa) and of its ruling party, Partido Popular (@ppopular), comprise the old political group, while the Madrid City Council (@Madrid) and its ruling party, Ahora Madrid (@AhoraMadrid), are integrated into the new political group. Additionally, word clouds provide a visual representation of the main terms used by each group. The study results show which group uses and better leverages Twitter’s potential, in that Partido Popular and Moncloa have clearer differences between party and institutional channels, while Ahora Madrid and the Madrid City Council do not seem to be as clear about the difference between the two concepts and use the party channel as the city council channel. However, the results demonstrate that the new political profile leverages Twitter’s potential more.
doi_str_mv 10.15581/003.32.1.19-36
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4f16fca2a0142d6a15382da94ba9bfd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e4f16fca2a0142d6a15382da94ba9bfd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_e4f16fca2a0142d6a15382da94ba9bfd</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d1076-fd2fcda8f9f385773647e82f2ca19dbd144d7b945cd06e7415d2dc810a7601283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjstqAjEYhYdCoWJdd5sHcKa5TZLprkgvgtKNXQ__5GIj40SSTMWn6CtXbVcHPs6tKB4IrkhdK_KIMasYrUhFmpKJm2JCmRKlVFLcFbOUdhhjIhWrGzUpfjZHn7ONc3SAmH2CAY3JIhgM8kPKPo_ZhwH6C31Ci7A_2yD774sF-lPyCXU2H60dUP6y6BCD871NKDi0DoPuA8zRGkz0Bi18Pp0bxkH7_jpwDviI4tj7Yfs3b9N9ceugT3b2r9Pi8_Vls3gvVx9vy8XzqjQES1E6Q502oFzjmKqlZIJLq6ijGkhjOkM4N7JreK0NFlZyUhtqtCIYpMCEKjYtln-9JsCuPUS_h3hqA_j2CkLctpdDuret5Y4Ip4ECJpwaAaRmihpoeAdN5wz7BYqfdHs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Twitter, partisan use and institutional use: Comparative analysis between the profiles of Moncloa, Madrid City Council and their ruling parties</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Aitor González-Bengoechea ; Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz ; María-Luisa García-Guardia</creator><creatorcontrib>Aitor González-Bengoechea ; Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz ; María-Luisa García-Guardia</creatorcontrib><description>This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analyses three different periods in the electoral process: the pre-campaign, campaign and post-campaign during the Spanish general elections of December 20th, 2015 in order to see if the election periods caused changes in their communications on Twitter. The sample consists of four cases divided into two groups for content analysis. On one hand, the Government’s Twitter profile (@desdelamoncloa) and of its ruling party, Partido Popular (@ppopular), comprise the old political group, while the Madrid City Council (@Madrid) and its ruling party, Ahora Madrid (@AhoraMadrid), are integrated into the new political group. Additionally, word clouds provide a visual representation of the main terms used by each group. The study results show which group uses and better leverages Twitter’s potential, in that Partido Popular and Moncloa have clearer differences between party and institutional channels, while Ahora Madrid and the Madrid City Council do not seem to be as clear about the difference between the two concepts and use the party channel as the city council channel. However, the results demonstrate that the new political profile leverages Twitter’s potential more.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2386-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.15581/003.32.1.19-36</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Universidad de Navarra</publisher><subject>ahora madrid ; madrid city council ; moncloa ; new politics ; old politics ; partido popular ; twitter</subject><ispartof>Communication &amp; Society, 2019-03, Vol.32 (1), p.19-36</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aitor González-Bengoechea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>María-Luisa García-Guardia</creatorcontrib><title>Twitter, partisan use and institutional use: Comparative analysis between the profiles of Moncloa, Madrid City Council and their ruling parties</title><title>Communication &amp; Society</title><description>This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analyses three different periods in the electoral process: the pre-campaign, campaign and post-campaign during the Spanish general elections of December 20th, 2015 in order to see if the election periods caused changes in their communications on Twitter. The sample consists of four cases divided into two groups for content analysis. On one hand, the Government’s Twitter profile (@desdelamoncloa) and of its ruling party, Partido Popular (@ppopular), comprise the old political group, while the Madrid City Council (@Madrid) and its ruling party, Ahora Madrid (@AhoraMadrid), are integrated into the new political group. Additionally, word clouds provide a visual representation of the main terms used by each group. The study results show which group uses and better leverages Twitter’s potential, in that Partido Popular and Moncloa have clearer differences between party and institutional channels, while Ahora Madrid and the Madrid City Council do not seem to be as clear about the difference between the two concepts and use the party channel as the city council channel. However, the results demonstrate that the new political profile leverages Twitter’s potential more.</description><subject>ahora madrid</subject><subject>madrid city council</subject><subject>moncloa</subject><subject>new politics</subject><subject>old politics</subject><subject>partido popular</subject><subject>twitter</subject><issn>2386-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjstqAjEYhYdCoWJdd5sHcKa5TZLprkgvgtKNXQ__5GIj40SSTMWn6CtXbVcHPs6tKB4IrkhdK_KIMasYrUhFmpKJm2JCmRKlVFLcFbOUdhhjIhWrGzUpfjZHn7ONc3SAmH2CAY3JIhgM8kPKPo_ZhwH6C31Ci7A_2yD774sF-lPyCXU2H60dUP6y6BCD871NKDi0DoPuA8zRGkz0Bi18Pp0bxkH7_jpwDviI4tj7Yfs3b9N9ceugT3b2r9Pi8_Vls3gvVx9vy8XzqjQES1E6Q502oFzjmKqlZIJLq6ijGkhjOkM4N7JreK0NFlZyUhtqtCIYpMCEKjYtln-9JsCuPUS_h3hqA_j2CkLctpdDuret5Y4Ip4ECJpwaAaRmihpoeAdN5wz7BYqfdHs</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Aitor González-Bengoechea</creator><creator>Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz</creator><creator>María-Luisa García-Guardia</creator><general>Universidad de Navarra</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Twitter, partisan use and institutional use: Comparative analysis between the profiles of Moncloa, Madrid City Council and their ruling parties</title><author>Aitor González-Bengoechea ; Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz ; María-Luisa García-Guardia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d1076-fd2fcda8f9f385773647e82f2ca19dbd144d7b945cd06e7415d2dc810a7601283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>ahora madrid</topic><topic>madrid city council</topic><topic>moncloa</topic><topic>new politics</topic><topic>old politics</topic><topic>partido popular</topic><topic>twitter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aitor González-Bengoechea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>María-Luisa García-Guardia</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Communication &amp; Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aitor González-Bengoechea</au><au>Cristóbal Fernández-Muñoz</au><au>María-Luisa García-Guardia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Twitter, partisan use and institutional use: Comparative analysis between the profiles of Moncloa, Madrid City Council and their ruling parties</atitle><jtitle>Communication &amp; Society</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>19-36</pages><eissn>2386-7876</eissn><abstract>This paper seeks to compare and analyse the differences in the use of Twitter that, Partido Popular, as a traditional political party, and Ahora Madrid, as a new political party, make of the institutional channels for the public institutions that they administer. In addition, the present study analyses three different periods in the electoral process: the pre-campaign, campaign and post-campaign during the Spanish general elections of December 20th, 2015 in order to see if the election periods caused changes in their communications on Twitter. The sample consists of four cases divided into two groups for content analysis. On one hand, the Government’s Twitter profile (@desdelamoncloa) and of its ruling party, Partido Popular (@ppopular), comprise the old political group, while the Madrid City Council (@Madrid) and its ruling party, Ahora Madrid (@AhoraMadrid), are integrated into the new political group. Additionally, word clouds provide a visual representation of the main terms used by each group. The study results show which group uses and better leverages Twitter’s potential, in that Partido Popular and Moncloa have clearer differences between party and institutional channels, while Ahora Madrid and the Madrid City Council do not seem to be as clear about the difference between the two concepts and use the party channel as the city council channel. However, the results demonstrate that the new political profile leverages Twitter’s potential more.</abstract><pub>Universidad de Navarra</pub><doi>10.15581/003.32.1.19-36</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2386-7876
ispartof Communication & Society, 2019-03, Vol.32 (1), p.19-36
issn 2386-7876
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e4f16fca2a0142d6a15382da94ba9bfd
source ABI/INFORM Global
subjects ahora madrid
madrid city council
moncloa
new politics
old politics
partido popular
twitter
title Twitter, partisan use and institutional use: Comparative analysis between the profiles of Moncloa, Madrid City Council and their ruling parties
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T08%3A47%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Twitter,%20partisan%20use%20and%20institutional%20use:%20Comparative%20analysis%20between%20the%20profiles%20of%20Moncloa,%20Madrid%20City%20Council%20and%20their%20ruling%20parties&rft.jtitle=Communication%20&%20Society&rft.au=Aitor%20Gonz%C3%A1lez-Bengoechea&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=19-36&rft.eissn=2386-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.15581/003.32.1.19-36&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_e4f16fca2a0142d6a15382da94ba9bfd%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d1076-fd2fcda8f9f385773647e82f2ca19dbd144d7b945cd06e7415d2dc810a7601283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true