Burnout Syndrome Among Critical Care Health Providers in Saudi Arabia

Burnout Syndrome constitutes a critical concern in healthcare, particularly among practitioners operating in high-stress, critical care settings. Understanding the multifaceted factors contributing to burnout in this context is pivotal for devising effective interventions and promoting the well-bein...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare 2024-01, Vol.17, p.843-854
Main Authors: Alshurtan, Kareemah Salem, Aldhaifi, Saad Yousef, Alshammari, Khalid Abdulkarim, Alodayli, Othman Mohammed, Alqahtani, Khalid Falah, Aldhaifi, Sarah Yousef
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
depersonalization
emotional exhaustion
healthcare professionals
high-stress environments
Job stress
maslach burnout inventory
mbi
Medical colleges
Medical personnel
occupational burnout
personal accomplishment
work-related stress
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Burnout Syndrome constitutes a critical concern in healthcare, particularly among practitioners operating in high-stress, critical care settings. Understanding the multifaceted factors contributing to burnout in this context is pivotal for devising effective interventions and promoting the well-being of critical care professionals. To investigate the prevalence, contributing factors, and potential interventions related to Burnout Syndrome among critical care health providers in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional research design was employed, gathering data from a sample of critical care health providers, including medical practitioners. A self-administered structured electronic questionnaire was used, incorporating the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) with its three subscales: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. The target population was male and female critical care health providers over 18 years age, most participants lies between 25 years to 34 years. Statistical analysis shows significant disparities in response distribution (p
ISSN:1178-2390
1178-2390
DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S452294