Loading…
Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination
Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in psychology 2021-03, Vol.12, p.643866-643866 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223 |
container_end_page | 643866 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 643866 |
container_title | Frontiers in psychology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Bratman, Gregory N Young, Gerald Mehta, Ashish Lee Babineaux, Ihno Daily, Gretchen C Gross, James J |
description | Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants (
= 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e55cba29d3ff442fac474fb5211776fa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e55cba29d3ff442fac474fb5211776fa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2506511501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LJDEQhsPisor6A_ay9NHLzOa708si6OCqICuInkN1ujJGejpjkhb89_Y4KppLQuqtpxIeQn4yOhfCNL_9Oj8v55xyNtdSGK2_kT2mtZwxWpudT-ddcpjzA52WpJxS_oPsClHX2tR0j_w98R5dCU9YneKAPpRcRV_9hzImrBZxKODKn-r2Hqub2OOmdjOuwgAlxOGAfPfQZzx82_fJ3b-z28XF7Or6_HJxcjVzUqsyk9jRrlFaO8egdm3ToofGKWOkalhDO6AGlHMoDZe87YThgptOsimkNedin1xuuV2EB7tOYQXp2UYI9vUipqWFVILr0aJSrgXedMJ7KbkHJ2vpW8UZm77sYWIdb1nrsV1h53AoCfov0K-VIdzbZXyydWMM53oCHL0BUnwcMRe7Ctlh38OAccyWK6oVY4qyKcq2UZdizgn9xxhG7UaifZVoNxLtVuLU8-vz-z463pWJFwg9mLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506511501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bratman, Gregory N ; Young, Gerald ; Mehta, Ashish ; Lee Babineaux, Ihno ; Daily, Gretchen C ; Gross, James J</creator><creatorcontrib>Bratman, Gregory N ; Young, Gerald ; Mehta, Ashish ; Lee Babineaux, Ihno ; Daily, Gretchen C ; Gross, James J</creatorcontrib><description>Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants (
= 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33776870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>affect ; emotion regulation ; nature contact ; Psychology ; rumination ; structural equation analysis</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.643866-643866</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Bratman, Young, Mehta, Lee Babineaux, Daily and Gross.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Bratman, Young, Mehta, Lee Babineaux, Daily and Gross. 2021 Bratman, Young, Mehta, Lee Babineaux, Daily and Gross</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988226/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988226/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bratman, Gregory N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daily, Gretchen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, James J</creatorcontrib><title>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants (
= 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.</description><subject>affect</subject><subject>emotion regulation</subject><subject>nature contact</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>rumination</subject><subject>structural equation analysis</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LJDEQhsPisor6A_ay9NHLzOa708si6OCqICuInkN1ujJGejpjkhb89_Y4KppLQuqtpxIeQn4yOhfCNL_9Oj8v55xyNtdSGK2_kT2mtZwxWpudT-ddcpjzA52WpJxS_oPsClHX2tR0j_w98R5dCU9YneKAPpRcRV_9hzImrBZxKODKn-r2Hqub2OOmdjOuwgAlxOGAfPfQZzx82_fJ3b-z28XF7Or6_HJxcjVzUqsyk9jRrlFaO8egdm3ToofGKWOkalhDO6AGlHMoDZe87YThgptOsimkNedin1xuuV2EB7tOYQXp2UYI9vUipqWFVILr0aJSrgXedMJ7KbkHJ2vpW8UZm77sYWIdb1nrsV1h53AoCfov0K-VIdzbZXyydWMM53oCHL0BUnwcMRe7Ctlh38OAccyWK6oVY4qyKcq2UZdizgn9xxhG7UaifZVoNxLtVuLU8-vz-z463pWJFwg9mLk</recordid><startdate>20210310</startdate><enddate>20210310</enddate><creator>Bratman, Gregory N</creator><creator>Young, Gerald</creator><creator>Mehta, Ashish</creator><creator>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</creator><creator>Daily, Gretchen C</creator><creator>Gross, James J</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210310</creationdate><title>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</title><author>Bratman, Gregory N ; Young, Gerald ; Mehta, Ashish ; Lee Babineaux, Ihno ; Daily, Gretchen C ; Gross, James J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>affect</topic><topic>emotion regulation</topic><topic>nature contact</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>rumination</topic><topic>structural equation analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bratman, Gregory N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daily, Gretchen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, James J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bratman, Gregory N</au><au>Young, Gerald</au><au>Mehta, Ashish</au><au>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</au><au>Daily, Gretchen C</au><au>Gross, James J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-03-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>643866</spage><epage>643866</epage><pages>643866-643866</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants (
= 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>33776870</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-1078 |
ispartof | Frontiers in psychology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.643866-643866 |
issn | 1664-1078 1664-1078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e55cba29d3ff442fac474fb5211776fa |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | affect emotion regulation nature contact Psychology rumination structural equation analysis |
title | Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20Benefits%20of%20Nature%20Contact:%20The%20Role%20of%20Rumination&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Bratman,%20Gregory%20N&rft.date=2021-03-10&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=643866&rft.epage=643866&rft.pages=643866-643866&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2506511501%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506511501&rft_id=info:pmid/33776870&rfr_iscdi=true |