Loading…

Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination

Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in psychology 2021-03, Vol.12, p.643866-643866
Main Authors: Bratman, Gregory N, Young, Gerald, Mehta, Ashish, Lee Babineaux, Ihno, Daily, Gretchen C, Gross, James J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223
container_end_page 643866
container_issue
container_start_page 643866
container_title Frontiers in psychology
container_volume 12
creator Bratman, Gregory N
Young, Gerald
Mehta, Ashish
Lee Babineaux, Ihno
Daily, Gretchen C
Gross, James J
description Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants ( = 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e55cba29d3ff442fac474fb5211776fa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e55cba29d3ff442fac474fb5211776fa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2506511501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LJDEQhsPisor6A_ay9NHLzOa708si6OCqICuInkN1ujJGejpjkhb89_Y4KppLQuqtpxIeQn4yOhfCNL_9Oj8v55xyNtdSGK2_kT2mtZwxWpudT-ddcpjzA52WpJxS_oPsClHX2tR0j_w98R5dCU9YneKAPpRcRV_9hzImrBZxKODKn-r2Hqub2OOmdjOuwgAlxOGAfPfQZzx82_fJ3b-z28XF7Or6_HJxcjVzUqsyk9jRrlFaO8egdm3ToofGKWOkalhDO6AGlHMoDZe87YThgptOsimkNedin1xuuV2EB7tOYQXp2UYI9vUipqWFVILr0aJSrgXedMJ7KbkHJ2vpW8UZm77sYWIdb1nrsV1h53AoCfov0K-VIdzbZXyydWMM53oCHL0BUnwcMRe7Ctlh38OAccyWK6oVY4qyKcq2UZdizgn9xxhG7UaifZVoNxLtVuLU8-vz-z463pWJFwg9mLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506511501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bratman, Gregory N ; Young, Gerald ; Mehta, Ashish ; Lee Babineaux, Ihno ; Daily, Gretchen C ; Gross, James J</creator><creatorcontrib>Bratman, Gregory N ; Young, Gerald ; Mehta, Ashish ; Lee Babineaux, Ihno ; Daily, Gretchen C ; Gross, James J</creatorcontrib><description>Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants ( = 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-1078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33776870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>affect ; emotion regulation ; nature contact ; Psychology ; rumination ; structural equation analysis</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in psychology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.643866-643866</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Bratman, Young, Mehta, Lee Babineaux, Daily and Gross.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Bratman, Young, Mehta, Lee Babineaux, Daily and Gross. 2021 Bratman, Young, Mehta, Lee Babineaux, Daily and Gross</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988226/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988226/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33776870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bratman, Gregory N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daily, Gretchen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, James J</creatorcontrib><title>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</title><title>Frontiers in psychology</title><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><description>Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants ( = 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.</description><subject>affect</subject><subject>emotion regulation</subject><subject>nature contact</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>rumination</subject><subject>structural equation analysis</subject><issn>1664-1078</issn><issn>1664-1078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LJDEQhsPisor6A_ay9NHLzOa708si6OCqICuInkN1ujJGejpjkhb89_Y4KppLQuqtpxIeQn4yOhfCNL_9Oj8v55xyNtdSGK2_kT2mtZwxWpudT-ddcpjzA52WpJxS_oPsClHX2tR0j_w98R5dCU9YneKAPpRcRV_9hzImrBZxKODKn-r2Hqub2OOmdjOuwgAlxOGAfPfQZzx82_fJ3b-z28XF7Or6_HJxcjVzUqsyk9jRrlFaO8egdm3ToofGKWOkalhDO6AGlHMoDZe87YThgptOsimkNedin1xuuV2EB7tOYQXp2UYI9vUipqWFVILr0aJSrgXedMJ7KbkHJ2vpW8UZm77sYWIdb1nrsV1h53AoCfov0K-VIdzbZXyydWMM53oCHL0BUnwcMRe7Ctlh38OAccyWK6oVY4qyKcq2UZdizgn9xxhG7UaifZVoNxLtVuLU8-vz-z463pWJFwg9mLk</recordid><startdate>20210310</startdate><enddate>20210310</enddate><creator>Bratman, Gregory N</creator><creator>Young, Gerald</creator><creator>Mehta, Ashish</creator><creator>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</creator><creator>Daily, Gretchen C</creator><creator>Gross, James J</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210310</creationdate><title>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</title><author>Bratman, Gregory N ; Young, Gerald ; Mehta, Ashish ; Lee Babineaux, Ihno ; Daily, Gretchen C ; Gross, James J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>affect</topic><topic>emotion regulation</topic><topic>nature contact</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>rumination</topic><topic>structural equation analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bratman, Gregory N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Ashish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daily, Gretchen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, James J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bratman, Gregory N</au><au>Young, Gerald</au><au>Mehta, Ashish</au><au>Lee Babineaux, Ihno</au><au>Daily, Gretchen C</au><au>Gross, James J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Psychol</addtitle><date>2021-03-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>643866</spage><epage>643866</epage><pages>643866-643866</pages><issn>1664-1078</issn><eissn>1664-1078</eissn><abstract>Mounting evidence shows that nature contact is associated with affective benefits. However, the psychological mechanisms responsible for these effects are not well understood. In this study, we examined whether more time spent in nature was associated with higher levels of positive affect in general, and lower levels of negative affect and rumination in general. We also conducted a cross-sectional mediation analysis to examine whether rumination mediated the association of nature contact with affect. Participants ( = 617) reported their average time spent in nature each week, as well as their general levels of positive and negative affect, and the degree to which they typically engaged in rumination in daily life. We then used structural equation modeling to test our hypotheses. Our results support the hypothesis that nature contact is associated with general levels of affect, and that rumination mediates this association for negative affect, and marginally mediates this association for positive affect.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>33776870</pmid><doi>10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-1078
ispartof Frontiers in psychology, 2021-03, Vol.12, p.643866-643866
issn 1664-1078
1664-1078
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e55cba29d3ff442fac474fb5211776fa
source PubMed Central
subjects affect
emotion regulation
nature contact
Psychology
rumination
structural equation analysis
title Affective Benefits of Nature Contact: The Role of Rumination
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T04%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20Benefits%20of%20Nature%20Contact:%20The%20Role%20of%20Rumination&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20psychology&rft.au=Bratman,%20Gregory%20N&rft.date=2021-03-10&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=643866&rft.epage=643866&rft.pages=643866-643866&rft.issn=1664-1078&rft.eissn=1664-1078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643866&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2506511501%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-4ed0d9566cc1a7cb9befa9c588459190da08a5cce48242bd382328d41a9c66223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506511501&rft_id=info:pmid/33776870&rfr_iscdi=true