The effect of restorative material selection and cementation procedures on the durability of endocrowns in the anterior teeth: an in-vitro study

• Published in: BMC oral health 2024-06, Vol.24 (1), p.670-10
• Main Authors: Samra, Nehal, Madina, Manal M, El-Negoly, Salwa Abd El-Raof, Dawood, Lamia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aesthetics; Analysis; Biomechanics; Bond strength; CAD-CAM systems industry; Cement; Cementation - methods; Ceramic materials; Ceramics; Ceramics - chemistry; Comparative analysis; Computer-Aided Design; Crowns; Crowns (Dentistry); Dental cement; Dental enamel; Dental Materials - chemistry; Dental Porcelain - chemistry; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Stress Analysis; E-max; Endodontics; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; Fracture strength; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Incisor; Incisors; Lithium; Materials; Materials Testing; MDP; Mechanical properties; Mode of failure; Phosphate esters; Resin Cements - chemistry; Software; Statistical analysis; Teeth; Testing; Zirconia; Zirconium - chemistry; Zirconium oxide
• ISSN: 1472-6831; 1472-6831
• DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04381-9

To investigate the fracture resistance and failure modalities of anterior endocrown restorations fabricated employing diverse ceramic materials, and bonded using various cementation methodologies. Forty maxillary central incisors were divided into two main groups based on the ceramic materials used; GroupI (Zir): zirconia endocrwons (Zolid HT , Ceramill, Amanngirrbach) and GroupII (E-Max): e-max endocrowns (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent). Both groups were further split into two subgroups depending on the cementation protocols; subgroup IA "ZirMDP": endocowns cemented with MDP primer + MDP resin cement, subgroup IB (ZirNon-MDP): cemented with MDP primer + non-MDP resin cement, subgroup IIA (E-maxMDP): cemented with MDP primer + MDP resin cement, subgroup IIB (E-maxNon-MDP): cemented with MDP primer + non-MDP resin cement. (n = 10/subgroup). Endocrowns were manufactured using CAD/ CAM. Teeth were subjected to 10,000 thermal cycles. The fracture test was performed at 45 with a palatal force direction until the fracture occurred. Test results were recorded in Newton. The failure mode was examined using a stereomicroscope. A One-way ANOVA test was utilized to compare different groups regarding fracture strength values. Tukey`s Post Hoc was utilized for multiple comparisons. The comparative analysis of fracture strength across the diverse groups yielded non-significant differences, as indicated by a p-value exceeding 0.05. Nonetheless, an observable trend emerged regarding the mode of failure. Specifically, a statistically significant prevalence was noted in fractures localized within the endocrown/tooth complex below the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) across all groups, except for Group IIB, "E-max Non-MDP," where fractures within the endocrown/tooth complex occurred above the CEJ. Combining an MDP-based primer with an MDP-based resin cement did not result in a significant effect on the anterior endocrown fracture strength. Regardless of the presence of the MDP monomer in its composition, adhesive resin cement achieved highly successful fracture strength when used with MDP-based ceramic primers. Additionally, ceramic materials exhibiting elastic moduli surpassing those of dentin are discouraged due to their propensity to induce catastrophic fractures within the tooth structure.