Applying RE-AIM to examine the impact of an implementation facilitation package to scale up a program for Veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

• Published in: Implementation science communications 2023-11, Vol.4 (1), p.143-143, Article 143
• Main Authors: Portillo, Edward C, Maurer, Martha A, Kettner, Jordyn T, Bhardwaj, Sonia D, Zhang, Ziting, Sedgwick, Cassie, Gilson, Aaron M, Stone, Jamie A, Jacobson, Nora, Hennessy-Garza, Rose, Will, Sarah, McFarland, M Shawn, Ourth, Heather, Chui, Michelle A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Implementation facilitation; RE-AIM; Veterans Healthcare Administration
• ISSN: 2662-2211; 2662-2211
• DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00520-5

US Veterans are four times more likely to be diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to the civilian population with no care model that consistently improves Veteran outcomes when scaled. COPD Coordinated Access to Reduce Exacerbations (CARE) is a care bundle intended to improve the delivery of evidence-based practices to Veterans. To address challenges to scaling this program in the Veterans' Health Administration (VA), the COPD CARE Academy (Academy), an implementation facilitation package comprised of five implementation strategies was designed and implemented. This evaluation utilized a mixed-methods approach to assess the impact of the Academy's implementation strategies on the RE-AIM framework implementation outcomes and the extent to which they were effective at increasing clinicians' perceived capability to implement COPD CARE. A survey was administered one week after Academy participation and a semi-structured interview conducted 8 to 12 months later. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative items and thematic analysis was used to analyze open-ended items. Thirty-six clinicians from 13 VA medical centers (VAMCs) participated in the Academy in 2020 and 2021 and 264 front-line clinicians completed COPD CARE training. Adoption of the Academy was indicated by high rates of Academy session attendance (90%) and high utilization of Academy resources. Clinicians reported the Academy to be acceptable and appropriate as an implementation package and clinicians from 92% of VAMCs reported long-term utilization of Academy resources. Effectiveness of the Academy was represented by clinicians' significant increases (p < 0.05) in their capability to complete ten implementation tasks after Academy participation. This evaluation found that the use of implementation facilitation paired with additional strategies enhanced the capacity of clinicians to implement COPD CARE. Future assessments are needed to explore post-academy resources that would help VAMCs to strategize localized approaches to overcome barriers.