Loading…

Developments in esophageal surgery for adenocarcinoma: a comparison of two decades

The objective of this study was to examine outcomes in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institution during a 20-year period and, in particular, to address temporal trends in long-term survival. Out of 470 patients who underwent esophagectomy for malignancy between S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC cancer 2007-06, Vol.7 (1), p.114-114, Article 114
Main Authors: Gockel, I, Sultanov, F S, Domeyer, M, Goenner, U, Junginger, Th
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683
container_end_page 114
container_issue 1
container_start_page 114
container_title BMC cancer
container_volume 7
creator Gockel, I
Sultanov, F S
Domeyer, M
Goenner, U
Junginger, Th
description The objective of this study was to examine outcomes in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institution during a 20-year period and, in particular, to address temporal trends in long-term survival. Out of 470 patients who underwent esophagectomy for malignancy between September 1985 and September 2005, a total number of 175 patients presented with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients enrolled in this study included AEG (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) type I tumors only. Time trends were studied comparing two decades, 9/1985 to 9/1995 (DI) and 10/1995 to 9/2005 (DII). The overall survival was significantly more favourable in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma in the recent time period (DII, 10/1995 to 9/2005) as compared to the early time period (DI, 9/1985 to 9/1995) (log rank test: p = 0.0329). Significant differences in the recent decade were seen based on lower ASA-classifications, earlier tumor stages, and the operative procedure with a higher frequency of transhiatal resections (p < 0.05). 30-day mortality improved from 8.3% to 3.1% during the 20-year time-interval, thus without statistical significance. Based on our experience, overall survival is improving over time for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Factors that may play an important role in this trend include early diagnosis and improved patient selection through better preoperative staging, improved surgical technique with a tailored approach carefully evaluated by physiologic patient status, comorbidity and tumor extent.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/1471-2407-7-114
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e68f2ea0e72c453193a63e3690728d27</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A166271154</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e68f2ea0e72c453193a63e3690728d27</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A166271154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks1r3DAQxU1padK0596KoRDowYkkryW5h0KafgUChbQ9i7E89irYno1kp81_Xzm7pGtITxKjNz9J702SvObshHMtT_lK8UysmMpUxvnqSXL4UHm6tz9IXoRwzRhXmunnyQFXkuW6lIfJ1Se8xY42PQ5jSN2QYqDNGlqELg2Tb9HfpQ35FGocyIK3bqAe3qeQWuo34F2gIaUmHX9TWqONsvAyedZAF_DVbj1Kfn35_PP8W3b5_evF-dllVsmVHjNe5lBJXoiKcSF4LSql7apgTNhGFlDoui6ttCgaQJC5LQqt6rISUrA6Nur8KLnYcmuCa7Pxrgd_ZwicuS-Qbw340dkODUrdCASGSsQr8vlqmWMuS6aEroWKrA9b1maqeqxtdMNDt4AuTwa3Ni3dGl7y6O8M-LgFVI7-A1ieRPvMnI-Z8zHKxPQi5Hj3Ck83E4bR9C5Y7DoYkKZgFFM8F_dff7sVthB_54aGItPOYnPGpRSK82LGnTyigjmk3lkasHGxvmh4t2iImhH_jC1MIZiLH1dL7fGedh3nZVwH6qbR0RCWwtOt0HoKwWPzYApnZh7iR2x4sx_GP_1uavO_w8jqVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>70713268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developments in esophageal surgery for adenocarcinoma: a comparison of two decades</title><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Gockel, I ; Sultanov, F S ; Domeyer, M ; Goenner, U ; Junginger, Th</creator><creatorcontrib>Gockel, I ; Sultanov, F S ; Domeyer, M ; Goenner, U ; Junginger, Th</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to examine outcomes in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institution during a 20-year period and, in particular, to address temporal trends in long-term survival. Out of 470 patients who underwent esophagectomy for malignancy between September 1985 and September 2005, a total number of 175 patients presented with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients enrolled in this study included AEG (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) type I tumors only. Time trends were studied comparing two decades, 9/1985 to 9/1995 (DI) and 10/1995 to 9/2005 (DII). The overall survival was significantly more favourable in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma in the recent time period (DII, 10/1995 to 9/2005) as compared to the early time period (DI, 9/1985 to 9/1995) (log rank test: p = 0.0329). Significant differences in the recent decade were seen based on lower ASA-classifications, earlier tumor stages, and the operative procedure with a higher frequency of transhiatal resections (p &lt; 0.05). 30-day mortality improved from 8.3% to 3.1% during the 20-year time-interval, thus without statistical significance. Based on our experience, overall survival is improving over time for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Factors that may play an important role in this trend include early diagnosis and improved patient selection through better preoperative staging, improved surgical technique with a tailored approach carefully evaluated by physiologic patient status, comorbidity and tumor extent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2407</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-114</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17603896</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Care and treatment ; Combined Modality Therapy - methods ; Disease-Free Survival ; Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Esophagus ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision - standards ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging - trends ; Patient outcomes ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery ; Survival Analysis ; Survivors - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BMC cancer, 2007-06, Vol.7 (1), p.114-114, Article 114</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2007 Gockel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007 Gockel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914077/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1914077/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17603896$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gockel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultanov, F S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domeyer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goenner, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junginger, Th</creatorcontrib><title>Developments in esophageal surgery for adenocarcinoma: a comparison of two decades</title><title>BMC cancer</title><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to examine outcomes in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institution during a 20-year period and, in particular, to address temporal trends in long-term survival. Out of 470 patients who underwent esophagectomy for malignancy between September 1985 and September 2005, a total number of 175 patients presented with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients enrolled in this study included AEG (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) type I tumors only. Time trends were studied comparing two decades, 9/1985 to 9/1995 (DI) and 10/1995 to 9/2005 (DII). The overall survival was significantly more favourable in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma in the recent time period (DII, 10/1995 to 9/2005) as compared to the early time period (DI, 9/1985 to 9/1995) (log rank test: p = 0.0329). Significant differences in the recent decade were seen based on lower ASA-classifications, earlier tumor stages, and the operative procedure with a higher frequency of transhiatal resections (p &lt; 0.05). 30-day mortality improved from 8.3% to 3.1% during the 20-year time-interval, thus without statistical significance. Based on our experience, overall survival is improving over time for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Factors that may play an important role in this trend include early diagnosis and improved patient selection through better preoperative staging, improved surgical technique with a tailored approach carefully evaluated by physiologic patient status, comorbidity and tumor extent.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - trends</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Survivors - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1471-2407</issn><issn>1471-2407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks1r3DAQxU1padK0596KoRDowYkkryW5h0KafgUChbQ9i7E89irYno1kp81_Xzm7pGtITxKjNz9J702SvObshHMtT_lK8UysmMpUxvnqSXL4UHm6tz9IXoRwzRhXmunnyQFXkuW6lIfJ1Se8xY42PQ5jSN2QYqDNGlqELg2Tb9HfpQ35FGocyIK3bqAe3qeQWuo34F2gIaUmHX9TWqONsvAyedZAF_DVbj1Kfn35_PP8W3b5_evF-dllVsmVHjNe5lBJXoiKcSF4LSql7apgTNhGFlDoui6ttCgaQJC5LQqt6rISUrA6Nur8KLnYcmuCa7Pxrgd_ZwicuS-Qbw340dkODUrdCASGSsQr8vlqmWMuS6aEroWKrA9b1maqeqxtdMNDt4AuTwa3Ni3dGl7y6O8M-LgFVI7-A1ieRPvMnI-Z8zHKxPQi5Hj3Ck83E4bR9C5Y7DoYkKZgFFM8F_dff7sVthB_54aGItPOYnPGpRSK82LGnTyigjmk3lkasHGxvmh4t2iImhH_jC1MIZiLH1dL7fGedh3nZVwH6qbR0RCWwtOt0HoKwWPzYApnZh7iR2x4sx_GP_1uavO_w8jqVw</recordid><startdate>20070629</startdate><enddate>20070629</enddate><creator>Gockel, I</creator><creator>Sultanov, F S</creator><creator>Domeyer, M</creator><creator>Goenner, U</creator><creator>Junginger, Th</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070629</creationdate><title>Developments in esophageal surgery for adenocarcinoma: a comparison of two decades</title><author>Gockel, I ; Sultanov, F S ; Domeyer, M ; Goenner, U ; Junginger, Th</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - trends</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Survivors - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gockel, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sultanov, F S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domeyer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goenner, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Junginger, Th</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gockel, I</au><au>Sultanov, F S</au><au>Domeyer, M</au><au>Goenner, U</au><au>Junginger, Th</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Developments in esophageal surgery for adenocarcinoma: a comparison of two decades</atitle><jtitle>BMC cancer</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Cancer</addtitle><date>2007-06-29</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>114</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>114-114</pages><artnum>114</artnum><issn>1471-2407</issn><eissn>1471-2407</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to examine outcomes in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma at our institution during a 20-year period and, in particular, to address temporal trends in long-term survival. Out of 470 patients who underwent esophagectomy for malignancy between September 1985 and September 2005, a total number of 175 patients presented with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Patients enrolled in this study included AEG (adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction) type I tumors only. Time trends were studied comparing two decades, 9/1985 to 9/1995 (DI) and 10/1995 to 9/2005 (DII). The overall survival was significantly more favourable in patients undergoing esophageal resection for adenocarcinoma in the recent time period (DII, 10/1995 to 9/2005) as compared to the early time period (DI, 9/1985 to 9/1995) (log rank test: p = 0.0329). Significant differences in the recent decade were seen based on lower ASA-classifications, earlier tumor stages, and the operative procedure with a higher frequency of transhiatal resections (p &lt; 0.05). 30-day mortality improved from 8.3% to 3.1% during the 20-year time-interval, thus without statistical significance. Based on our experience, overall survival is improving over time for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Factors that may play an important role in this trend include early diagnosis and improved patient selection through better preoperative staging, improved surgical technique with a tailored approach carefully evaluated by physiologic patient status, comorbidity and tumor extent.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>17603896</pmid><doi>10.1186/1471-2407-7-114</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2407
ispartof BMC cancer, 2007-06, Vol.7 (1), p.114-114, Article 114
issn 1471-2407
1471-2407
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e68f2ea0e72c453193a63e3690728d27
source PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma - mortality
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Adult
Aged
Care and treatment
Combined Modality Therapy - methods
Disease-Free Survival
Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality
Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology
Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery
Esophagectomy - methods
Esophagus
Female
Humans
Lymph Node Excision - standards
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging - trends
Patient outcomes
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Surgery
Survival Analysis
Survivors - statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Developments in esophageal surgery for adenocarcinoma: a comparison of two decades
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A24%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developments%20in%20esophageal%20surgery%20for%20adenocarcinoma:%20a%20comparison%20of%20two%20decades&rft.jtitle=BMC%20cancer&rft.au=Gockel,%20I&rft.date=2007-06-29&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=114&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=114-114&rft.artnum=114&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1471-2407-7-114&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA166271154%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b648t-193ab6152b01221d2b78c45002cf65a58dd9c6ce2faea63c5587d9b2620dab683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=70713268&rft_id=info:pmid/17603896&rft_galeid=A166271154&rfr_iscdi=true