Sex differences in the gait kinematics of patients with down syndrome: A preliminary report

Sex-specific medicine requires understanding of the specific therapeutic needs and patho-physiology of men and women. In these terms, we investigated sex-related differences in the gait kinematics of patients with Down syndrome. Retrospective observational cohort study. A sample of 230 patients (103...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of rehabilitation medicine 2019-02, Vol.51 (2), p.144-146
Main Authors: Zago, Matteo, Condoluci, Claudia, Pau, Massimiliano, Galli, Manuela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Body mass index
Cohort analysis
Down syndrome
Gait
gait analysis
Gender differences
Kinematics
Limbs
Lower limbs
Pathophysiology
Pelvis
Rehabilitation
Severity
sex
Sex differences
Therapists
Width
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sex-specific medicine requires understanding of the specific therapeutic needs and patho-physiology of men and women. In these terms, we investigated sex-related differences in the gait kinematics of patients with Down syndrome. Retrospective observational cohort study. A sample of 230 patients (103 females) aged 7-50 years underwent a standard gait-analysis test from 2000 to 2015. Spatiotemporal gait parameters and synthetic indexes were computed as Gait Profile Score (GPS) and pelvis/lower limbs as Gait Variable Scores. Although speed, normalized step width, %stance and %swing were similar, in female patients step length was shorter and GPS was higher than in male patients, with no significant effect of age, speed and body mass index. Sex-specific features were found at the pelvis, hip and knee level (sagittal plane), and at the ankle level (transverse plane). Overall, in people with Down syndrome, the gait function of females tends to be more impaired than in males, with the exception of foot progression. Therapists should consider these differences when evaluating the severity of gait impairment and designing rehabilitation strategies.
ISSN:1650-1977
1651-2081
DOI:10.2340/16501977-2507