Loading…
Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites
Eighty percent of US oil and natural gas (O&G) production sites are low production well sites, with average site-level production ≤15 barrels of oil equivalent per day and producing only 6% of the nation’s O&G output in 2019. Here, we integrate national site-level O&G production data and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature communications 2022-04, Vol.13 (1), p.2085-10, Article 2085 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2085 |
container_title | Nature communications |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Omara, Mark Zavala-Araiza, Daniel Lyon, David R. Hmiel, Benjamin Roberts, Katherine A. Hamburg, Steven P. |
description | Eighty percent of US oil and natural gas (O&G) production sites are low production well sites, with average site-level production ≤15 barrels of oil equivalent per day and producing only 6% of the nation’s O&G output in 2019. Here, we integrate national site-level O&G production data and previously reported site-level CH
4
measurement data (
n
= 240) and find that low production well sites are a disproportionately large source of US O&G well site CH
4
emissions, emitting more than 4 (95% confidence interval: 3—6) teragrams, 50% more than the total CH
4
emissions from the Permian Basin, one of the world’s largest O&G producing regions. We estimate low production well sites represent roughly half (37—75%) of all O&G well site CH
4
emissions, and a production-normalized CH
4
loss rate of more than 10%—a factor of 6—12 times higher than the mean CH
4
loss rate of 1.5% for all O&G well sites in the US. Our work suggests that achieving significant reductions in O&G CH
4
emissions will require mitigation of emissions from low production well sites.
Only 6 percent of US oil and natural gas production output is from low production well sites. Here the authors show that total methane emissions from these low producing well sites in the US is substantial, representing about one-half of all production site methane emissions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6e78d999e184aa4aa5d300ebb053e5f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e6e78d999e184aa4aa5d300ebb053e5f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2652408444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCIVqV_gAOyxIVLwN-xL0ioglKpiAP0bDn2yzarbLzYCRX_ntdNKS0HLMu2nueNPTOEvOTsLWfSvquKK9M2TIhGuJa5Rj4hx4Ip3vBWyKcPzkfktNYtwyEdt0o9J0dSK8W0kcfk_AvM12ECCruh1iFPlfYl7-jVNzrmG7ovOS1xxjrNw0jDlOgU5qWEkW5CpTcwjrQOM9QX5Fkfxgqnd_sJufr08fvZ5-by6_nF2YfLJmrF5ka2tovSGhM4iwZ1tNphxYlogWtrrQlShb5VrBPRpK5LKLbHNbkkk-zkCblYeVMOW78vwy6UXz6HwR8KuWx8KPMQR_BgoLXJOQeoOgScOknGoOuYlqB75Hq_cu2XbgcpwjSjsEekj2-m4dpv8k_vGHdMGiR4c0dQ8o8F6uzRxIieoKF5qV4YLVArF7fQ1_9At3kpE1p1QCmGwShEiRUVS661QH__Gc78bex-jd1j7P4Qu5fY9OqhjPuWPyEjQK6AilfTBsrft_9D-xvQZbez</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652408444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Nature</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><source>Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access</source><creator>Omara, Mark ; Zavala-Araiza, Daniel ; Lyon, David R. ; Hmiel, Benjamin ; Roberts, Katherine A. ; Hamburg, Steven P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Omara, Mark ; Zavala-Araiza, Daniel ; Lyon, David R. ; Hmiel, Benjamin ; Roberts, Katherine A. ; Hamburg, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Eighty percent of US oil and natural gas (O&G) production sites are low production well sites, with average site-level production ≤15 barrels of oil equivalent per day and producing only 6% of the nation’s O&G output in 2019. Here, we integrate national site-level O&G production data and previously reported site-level CH
4
measurement data (
n
= 240) and find that low production well sites are a disproportionately large source of US O&G well site CH
4
emissions, emitting more than 4 (95% confidence interval: 3—6) teragrams, 50% more than the total CH
4
emissions from the Permian Basin, one of the world’s largest O&G producing regions. We estimate low production well sites represent roughly half (37—75%) of all O&G well site CH
4
emissions, and a production-normalized CH
4
loss rate of more than 10%—a factor of 6—12 times higher than the mean CH
4
loss rate of 1.5% for all O&G well sites in the US. Our work suggests that achieving significant reductions in O&G CH
4
emissions will require mitigation of emissions from low production well sites.
Only 6 percent of US oil and natural gas production output is from low production well sites. Here the authors show that total methane emissions from these low producing well sites in the US is substantial, representing about one-half of all production site methane emissions.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2041-1723</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2041-1723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35440563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/172 ; 704/172/4081 ; Air Pollutants - analysis ; Confidence intervals ; Emissions ; Gas production ; Gas wells ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Methane ; Methane - analysis ; multidisciplinary ; Natural gas ; Natural Gas - analysis ; Oil ; Oil and Gas Fields ; Oil and gas production ; Permian ; Science ; Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><ispartof>Nature communications, 2022-04, Vol.13 (1), p.2085-10, Article 2085</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8933-1927 ; 0000-0002-8394-5725 ; 0000-0002-4400-1190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652408444?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652408444?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35440563$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Omara, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavala-Araiza, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hmiel, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamburg, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><title>Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites</title><title>Nature communications</title><addtitle>Nat Commun</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Commun</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Eighty percent of US oil and natural gas (O&G) production sites are low production well sites, with average site-level production ≤15 barrels of oil equivalent per day and producing only 6% of the nation’s O&G output in 2019. Here, we integrate national site-level O&G production data and previously reported site-level CH
4
measurement data (
n
= 240) and find that low production well sites are a disproportionately large source of US O&G well site CH
4
emissions, emitting more than 4 (95% confidence interval: 3—6) teragrams, 50% more than the total CH
4
emissions from the Permian Basin, one of the world’s largest O&G producing regions. We estimate low production well sites represent roughly half (37—75%) of all O&G well site CH
4
emissions, and a production-normalized CH
4
loss rate of more than 10%—a factor of 6—12 times higher than the mean CH
4
loss rate of 1.5% for all O&G well sites in the US. Our work suggests that achieving significant reductions in O&G CH
4
emissions will require mitigation of emissions from low production well sites.
Only 6 percent of US oil and natural gas production output is from low production well sites. Here the authors show that total methane emissions from these low producing well sites in the US is substantial, representing about one-half of all production site methane emissions.]]></description><subject>704/172</subject><subject>704/172/4081</subject><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>multidisciplinary</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Natural Gas - analysis</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Oil and Gas Fields</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Permian</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Science (multidisciplinary)</subject><issn>2041-1723</issn><issn>2041-1723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCIVqV_gAOyxIVLwN-xL0ioglKpiAP0bDn2yzarbLzYCRX_ntdNKS0HLMu2nueNPTOEvOTsLWfSvquKK9M2TIhGuJa5Rj4hx4Ip3vBWyKcPzkfktNYtwyEdt0o9J0dSK8W0kcfk_AvM12ECCruh1iFPlfYl7-jVNzrmG7ovOS1xxjrNw0jDlOgU5qWEkW5CpTcwjrQOM9QX5Fkfxgqnd_sJufr08fvZ5-by6_nF2YfLJmrF5ka2tovSGhM4iwZ1tNphxYlogWtrrQlShb5VrBPRpK5LKLbHNbkkk-zkCblYeVMOW78vwy6UXz6HwR8KuWx8KPMQR_BgoLXJOQeoOgScOknGoOuYlqB75Hq_cu2XbgcpwjSjsEekj2-m4dpv8k_vGHdMGiR4c0dQ8o8F6uzRxIieoKF5qV4YLVArF7fQ1_9At3kpE1p1QCmGwShEiRUVS661QH__Gc78bex-jd1j7P4Qu5fY9OqhjPuWPyEjQK6AilfTBsrft_9D-xvQZbez</recordid><startdate>20220419</startdate><enddate>20220419</enddate><creator>Omara, Mark</creator><creator>Zavala-Araiza, Daniel</creator><creator>Lyon, David R.</creator><creator>Hmiel, Benjamin</creator><creator>Roberts, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Hamburg, Steven P.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><general>Nature Portfolio</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-1927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-5725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4400-1190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220419</creationdate><title>Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites</title><author>Omara, Mark ; Zavala-Araiza, Daniel ; Lyon, David R. ; Hmiel, Benjamin ; Roberts, Katherine A. ; Hamburg, Steven P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>704/172</topic><topic>704/172/4081</topic><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>multidisciplinary</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Natural Gas - analysis</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Oil and Gas Fields</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Permian</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Science (multidisciplinary)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Omara, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zavala-Araiza, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hmiel, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamburg, Steven P.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Nature communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Omara, Mark</au><au>Zavala-Araiza, Daniel</au><au>Lyon, David R.</au><au>Hmiel, Benjamin</au><au>Roberts, Katherine A.</au><au>Hamburg, Steven P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites</atitle><jtitle>Nature communications</jtitle><stitle>Nat Commun</stitle><addtitle>Nat Commun</addtitle><date>2022-04-19</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2085</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>2085-10</pages><artnum>2085</artnum><issn>2041-1723</issn><eissn>2041-1723</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Eighty percent of US oil and natural gas (O&G) production sites are low production well sites, with average site-level production ≤15 barrels of oil equivalent per day and producing only 6% of the nation’s O&G output in 2019. Here, we integrate national site-level O&G production data and previously reported site-level CH
4
measurement data (
n
= 240) and find that low production well sites are a disproportionately large source of US O&G well site CH
4
emissions, emitting more than 4 (95% confidence interval: 3—6) teragrams, 50% more than the total CH
4
emissions from the Permian Basin, one of the world’s largest O&G producing regions. We estimate low production well sites represent roughly half (37—75%) of all O&G well site CH
4
emissions, and a production-normalized CH
4
loss rate of more than 10%—a factor of 6—12 times higher than the mean CH
4
loss rate of 1.5% for all O&G well sites in the US. Our work suggests that achieving significant reductions in O&G CH
4
emissions will require mitigation of emissions from low production well sites.
Only 6 percent of US oil and natural gas production output is from low production well sites. Here the authors show that total methane emissions from these low producing well sites in the US is substantial, representing about one-half of all production site methane emissions.]]></abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>35440563</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-1927</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-5725</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4400-1190</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2041-1723 |
ispartof | Nature communications, 2022-04, Vol.13 (1), p.2085-10, Article 2085 |
issn | 2041-1723 2041-1723 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e6e78d999e184aa4aa5d300ebb053e5f |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Nature; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); Coronavirus Research Database; Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access |
subjects | 704/172 704/172/4081 Air Pollutants - analysis Confidence intervals Emissions Gas production Gas wells Humanities and Social Sciences Methane Methane - analysis multidisciplinary Natural gas Natural Gas - analysis Oil Oil and Gas Fields Oil and gas production Permian Science Science (multidisciplinary) |
title | Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A10%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methane%20emissions%20from%20US%20low%20production%20oil%20and%20natural%20gas%20well%20sites&rft.jtitle=Nature%20communications&rft.au=Omara,%20Mark&rft.date=2022-04-19&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2085&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=2085-10&rft.artnum=2085&rft.issn=2041-1723&rft.eissn=2041-1723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2652408444%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-378bc3866a10c60387598bc92c8e158886a34af740b2c6dbbd103fbd1d9d3d3b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652408444&rft_id=info:pmid/35440563&rfr_iscdi=true |