Loading…

The Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing Test, and Three-Item Recall Test: Rapid Cognitive Screening Tools with Comparable Performance in Detecting Mild NCD in Older Patients

Early mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) detection can allow for appropriate planning and delay disease progression. There have been few studies examining validated mild NCD detection tools. One such tool that may be of use is the Mini-Cog, which consists of the clock drawing test (CDT) and thr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geriatrics (Basel) 2021-09, Vol.6 (3), p.91
Main Authors: Limpawattana, Panita, Manjavong, Manchumad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 91
container_title Geriatrics (Basel)
container_volume 6
creator Limpawattana, Panita
Manjavong, Manchumad
description Early mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) detection can allow for appropriate planning and delay disease progression. There have been few studies examining validated mild NCD detection tools. One such tool that may be of use is the Mini-Cog, which consists of the clock drawing test (CDT) and three-item recall. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Cog, the CDT alone, and the three-item recall test alone in mild NCD detection according to DSM-5 criteria. The participants were older patients attending the medicine outpatient clinic. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the tools' accuracy. A total of 150 patients were enrolled, 42 of whom were diagnosed as having mild NCD. The AUCs of ROC curves of the three-item recall, CDT, Mini-Cog1, and Mini-Cog2 were 0.71, 0.67, 0.73, and 0.71, respectively ( = 0.36). The sensitivity of the tools was 85.7%, 66.7%, 57.4%, and 69% respectively. The tests performed similarly in participants with ≤6 years of education ( = 0.27) and those with >6 years of education ( = 0.49). All tools exhibited similar acceptable performance in detecting mild NCD and were not affected by education. These convenient tools might be suitable for use in clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/geriatrics6030091
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e738f35b5dd7499da13152fff27c5ca0</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e738f35b5dd7499da13152fff27c5ca0</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2576656495</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkt1uEzEQhVcIRKvSB-AGWeKGiy74Z7275gKpSviJ1NKqhGtr1vYmDl472JtWPE7ftE5SqhaubM35ztHMaIriNcHvGRP4w8JEC2O0KtWYYSzIs-KQMtyWrCLN80f_g-I4pRXGmLSUibZ5WRywitdUCHpY3M6XBp1bb8tJWJygiQvqF5pGuLF-geYmjScIvEbzZTSmnI1mQFdGgXM77SO6grXVKFu9He21QT9U5vzOG4JL6MaOyywPa4jQOYMuTexDHMArg6xHUzMaNW7xc-s0-j6ZbqsXTpuILmG0xo_pVfGiB5fM8f17VPz88nk--VaeXXydTU7PSlUJNpacNIB7oUVHFaY106rrG6Y7UIpzTRRUpK-VAIK7RledEp1SGDJe64poitlRMdvn6gAruY52gPhHBrByVwhxISGOVjkjTcPanvGOa91UQmggjHDa9z1tFFewzfq0z1pvusFoleeI4J6EPlW8XcpFuJZt1VJa0xzw7j4ght-bvGo52KSMc-BN2CRJeVPXvK4Ez-jbf9BV2ESfV7WjKswFqTNF9pSKIaVo-odmCJbbe5L_3VP2vHk8xYPj7_WwOzPNysg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576405916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing Test, and Three-Item Recall Test: Rapid Cognitive Screening Tools with Comparable Performance in Detecting Mild NCD in Older Patients</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Limpawattana, Panita ; Manjavong, Manchumad</creator><creatorcontrib>Limpawattana, Panita ; Manjavong, Manchumad</creatorcontrib><description>Early mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) detection can allow for appropriate planning and delay disease progression. There have been few studies examining validated mild NCD detection tools. One such tool that may be of use is the Mini-Cog, which consists of the clock drawing test (CDT) and three-item recall. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Cog, the CDT alone, and the three-item recall test alone in mild NCD detection according to DSM-5 criteria. The participants were older patients attending the medicine outpatient clinic. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the tools' accuracy. A total of 150 patients were enrolled, 42 of whom were diagnosed as having mild NCD. The AUCs of ROC curves of the three-item recall, CDT, Mini-Cog1, and Mini-Cog2 were 0.71, 0.67, 0.73, and 0.71, respectively ( = 0.36). The sensitivity of the tools was 85.7%, 66.7%, 57.4%, and 69% respectively. The tests performed similarly in participants with ≤6 years of education ( = 0.27) and those with &gt;6 years of education ( = 0.49). All tools exhibited similar acceptable performance in detecting mild NCD and were not affected by education. These convenient tools might be suitable for use in clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2308-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2308-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/geriatrics6030091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34562992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Activities of daily living ; clock drawing test ; Cognitive ability ; Data analysis ; Delirium ; Dementia ; Education ; MCI ; Mental disorders ; mild cognitive impairment ; mild neurocognitive disorder ; Mini-Cog ; Neuropsychology ; Older people ; Patients ; Performance evaluation ; three-item recall test</subject><ispartof>Geriatrics (Basel), 2021-09, Vol.6 (3), p.91</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9334-5571 ; 0000-0003-3565-9342</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2576405916/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2576405916?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34562992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Limpawattana, Panita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjavong, Manchumad</creatorcontrib><title>The Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing Test, and Three-Item Recall Test: Rapid Cognitive Screening Tools with Comparable Performance in Detecting Mild NCD in Older Patients</title><title>Geriatrics (Basel)</title><addtitle>Geriatrics (Basel)</addtitle><description>Early mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) detection can allow for appropriate planning and delay disease progression. There have been few studies examining validated mild NCD detection tools. One such tool that may be of use is the Mini-Cog, which consists of the clock drawing test (CDT) and three-item recall. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Cog, the CDT alone, and the three-item recall test alone in mild NCD detection according to DSM-5 criteria. The participants were older patients attending the medicine outpatient clinic. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the tools' accuracy. A total of 150 patients were enrolled, 42 of whom were diagnosed as having mild NCD. The AUCs of ROC curves of the three-item recall, CDT, Mini-Cog1, and Mini-Cog2 were 0.71, 0.67, 0.73, and 0.71, respectively ( = 0.36). The sensitivity of the tools was 85.7%, 66.7%, 57.4%, and 69% respectively. The tests performed similarly in participants with ≤6 years of education ( = 0.27) and those with &gt;6 years of education ( = 0.49). All tools exhibited similar acceptable performance in detecting mild NCD and were not affected by education. These convenient tools might be suitable for use in clinical practice.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>clock drawing test</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>MCI</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>mild cognitive impairment</subject><subject>mild neurocognitive disorder</subject><subject>Mini-Cog</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>three-item recall test</subject><issn>2308-3417</issn><issn>2308-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplkt1uEzEQhVcIRKvSB-AGWeKGiy74Z7275gKpSviJ1NKqhGtr1vYmDl472JtWPE7ftE5SqhaubM35ztHMaIriNcHvGRP4w8JEC2O0KtWYYSzIs-KQMtyWrCLN80f_g-I4pRXGmLSUibZ5WRywitdUCHpY3M6XBp1bb8tJWJygiQvqF5pGuLF-geYmjScIvEbzZTSmnI1mQFdGgXM77SO6grXVKFu9He21QT9U5vzOG4JL6MaOyywPa4jQOYMuTexDHMArg6xHUzMaNW7xc-s0-j6ZbqsXTpuILmG0xo_pVfGiB5fM8f17VPz88nk--VaeXXydTU7PSlUJNpacNIB7oUVHFaY106rrG6Y7UIpzTRRUpK-VAIK7RledEp1SGDJe64poitlRMdvn6gAruY52gPhHBrByVwhxISGOVjkjTcPanvGOa91UQmggjHDa9z1tFFewzfq0z1pvusFoleeI4J6EPlW8XcpFuJZt1VJa0xzw7j4ght-bvGo52KSMc-BN2CRJeVPXvK4Ez-jbf9BV2ESfV7WjKswFqTNF9pSKIaVo-odmCJbbe5L_3VP2vHk8xYPj7_WwOzPNysg</recordid><startdate>20210916</startdate><enddate>20210916</enddate><creator>Limpawattana, Panita</creator><creator>Manjavong, Manchumad</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-5571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-9342</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210916</creationdate><title>The Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing Test, and Three-Item Recall Test: Rapid Cognitive Screening Tools with Comparable Performance in Detecting Mild NCD in Older Patients</title><author>Limpawattana, Panita ; Manjavong, Manchumad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>clock drawing test</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>MCI</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>mild cognitive impairment</topic><topic>mild neurocognitive disorder</topic><topic>Mini-Cog</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>three-item recall test</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Limpawattana, Panita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjavong, Manchumad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geriatrics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Limpawattana, Panita</au><au>Manjavong, Manchumad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing Test, and Three-Item Recall Test: Rapid Cognitive Screening Tools with Comparable Performance in Detecting Mild NCD in Older Patients</atitle><jtitle>Geriatrics (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Geriatrics (Basel)</addtitle><date>2021-09-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>91</spage><pages>91-</pages><issn>2308-3417</issn><eissn>2308-3417</eissn><abstract>Early mild neurocognitive disorder (mild NCD) detection can allow for appropriate planning and delay disease progression. There have been few studies examining validated mild NCD detection tools. One such tool that may be of use is the Mini-Cog, which consists of the clock drawing test (CDT) and three-item recall. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic properties of the Mini-Cog, the CDT alone, and the three-item recall test alone in mild NCD detection according to DSM-5 criteria. The participants were older patients attending the medicine outpatient clinic. Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) analysis was used to compare the tools' accuracy. A total of 150 patients were enrolled, 42 of whom were diagnosed as having mild NCD. The AUCs of ROC curves of the three-item recall, CDT, Mini-Cog1, and Mini-Cog2 were 0.71, 0.67, 0.73, and 0.71, respectively ( = 0.36). The sensitivity of the tools was 85.7%, 66.7%, 57.4%, and 69% respectively. The tests performed similarly in participants with ≤6 years of education ( = 0.27) and those with &gt;6 years of education ( = 0.49). All tools exhibited similar acceptable performance in detecting mild NCD and were not affected by education. These convenient tools might be suitable for use in clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34562992</pmid><doi>10.3390/geriatrics6030091</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9334-5571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-9342</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2308-3417
ispartof Geriatrics (Basel), 2021-09, Vol.6 (3), p.91
issn 2308-3417
2308-3417
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e738f35b5dd7499da13152fff27c5ca0
source PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Accuracy
Activities of daily living
clock drawing test
Cognitive ability
Data analysis
Delirium
Dementia
Education
MCI
Mental disorders
mild cognitive impairment
mild neurocognitive disorder
Mini-Cog
Neuropsychology
Older people
Patients
Performance evaluation
three-item recall test
title The Mini-Cog, Clock Drawing Test, and Three-Item Recall Test: Rapid Cognitive Screening Tools with Comparable Performance in Detecting Mild NCD in Older Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Mini-Cog,%20Clock%20Drawing%20Test,%20and%20Three-Item%20Recall%20Test:%20Rapid%20Cognitive%20Screening%20Tools%20with%20Comparable%20Performance%20in%20Detecting%20Mild%20NCD%20in%20Older%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Geriatrics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Limpawattana,%20Panita&rft.date=2021-09-16&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=91&rft.pages=91-&rft.issn=2308-3417&rft.eissn=2308-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/geriatrics6030091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2576656495%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c493t-517a0f9d9b2c0263dcbf73dbacc55d1ca41f6c9a10b7d4bc9bcc0ad9b6d41d203%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576405916&rft_id=info:pmid/34562992&rfr_iscdi=true