Loading…

A Combination of Laboratory Testing, RCE, and Corrosion Loop for Inhibitor Selection

Corrosion inhibitors are evaluated in the oil industry with electrochemical tests of resistance to linear polarization with rotating cylinders following ASTM G170 and NACE 3T199 standards. With these tests, we can determine the corrosion rate (CR) and efficiency of corrosion inhibitors. In this work...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied sciences 2023-04, Vol.13 (7), p.4586
Main Authors: Bianchi, Gustavo Luis, Acosta, Verónica, Seijas, Carlos
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef4633a11d974dc27a2c66b432d079d60063633e42886a65bf2978c9d12eb36d3
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4586
container_title Applied sciences
container_volume 13
creator Bianchi, Gustavo Luis
Acosta, Verónica
Seijas, Carlos
description Corrosion inhibitors are evaluated in the oil industry with electrochemical tests of resistance to linear polarization with rotating cylinders following ASTM G170 and NACE 3T199 standards. With these tests, we can determine the corrosion rate (CR) and efficiency of corrosion inhibitors. In this work, a corrosion test protocol used by hydrocarbon-producing companies for the testing of corrosion inhibitors was used. This protocol consists of a 1045 carbon steel working electrode in a NACE solution composed of 9.62% NaCl, 0.45% CaCl2, 0.19% MgCl2, and 89.74% H2O, at a temperature of 65 °C and saturated with CO2. Each inhibitor tested was subjected to a series of 6000-4000-2000-4000-6000 rpm tests using rotating cylinder electrodes (RCEs). These electrochemical studies were carried out with the rotating cylinder to evaluate the ability of the inhibitor to prevent the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of a centrifugal force. In our opinion, this test does not provide corrosion engineers with enough information to be used as a predictive tool, since what is obtained is the CR in a very short testing time. This document proposes the use of two more appropriate test methodologies, the rotating cylinder electrode (RCE) and the flow loop (FL), to evaluate the performance of the corrosion inhibitor. For the FL, the selected flow rate was 1.2 m/s, the same rate that fluids have in oil company pipelines installed in Neuquén, Argentina. Firstly, according to the company’s protocol, inhibitors are required to have an efficiency greater than or equal to 90% in RCE tests; therefore, inhibitors that meet these requirements were tested in the FL test. Unlike the RCE test, the FL test represents the experimental conditions of the laboratory that are closest to reality, for the evaluation of the performance of the inhibitors used in the pipelines of the oil and gas industry. FL tests have several problems involving corrosion, erosion, abrasion, biphasic fluids, the time it takes for the inhibitor to become effective, and the duration of its effectiveness.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/app13074586
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e85149513fa844e488bb16c1e701314e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A751990193</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e85149513fa844e488bb16c1e701314e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A751990193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef4633a11d974dc27a2c66b432d079d60063633e42886a65bf2978c9d12eb36d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtLAzEQgBdRsNSe_AMBj7Y1s8nmcSylaqEgaD2HbB41pd2s2e2h_97UinRymDB88zHJFMU94CkhEj_ptgWCOa0EuyoGJeZsQijw64v7bTHqui3OIYEIwINiPUPzuK9Do_sQGxQ9Wuk6Jt3HdERr1_Wh2YzR-3wxRrqxmU0pdidyFWOLfExo2XyFOmQefbidMyfNXXHj9a5zo788LD6fF-v562T19rKcz1YTQxj0E-cpI0QDWMmpNSXXpWGspqS0mEvLMGYkA46WQjDNqtqXkgsjLZSuJsySYbE8e23UW9WmsNfpqKIO6rcQ00bp1Aezc8qJCqisgHgtKHVUiLoGZsBxDASoy66Hs6tN8fuQH6628ZCaPL4quZSVhIrzTE3P1EZnaWh87JM2-Vi3DyY2zodcn_EKpMQgSW54PDeY_G9dcv5_TMDqtDZ1sTbyA8PWhto</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2799591577</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Combination of Laboratory Testing, RCE, and Corrosion Loop for Inhibitor Selection</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis ; Acosta, Verónica ; Seijas, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis ; Acosta, Verónica ; Seijas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Corrosion inhibitors are evaluated in the oil industry with electrochemical tests of resistance to linear polarization with rotating cylinders following ASTM G170 and NACE 3T199 standards. With these tests, we can determine the corrosion rate (CR) and efficiency of corrosion inhibitors. In this work, a corrosion test protocol used by hydrocarbon-producing companies for the testing of corrosion inhibitors was used. This protocol consists of a 1045 carbon steel working electrode in a NACE solution composed of 9.62% NaCl, 0.45% CaCl2, 0.19% MgCl2, and 89.74% H2O, at a temperature of 65 °C and saturated with CO2. Each inhibitor tested was subjected to a series of 6000-4000-2000-4000-6000 rpm tests using rotating cylinder electrodes (RCEs). These electrochemical studies were carried out with the rotating cylinder to evaluate the ability of the inhibitor to prevent the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of a centrifugal force. In our opinion, this test does not provide corrosion engineers with enough information to be used as a predictive tool, since what is obtained is the CR in a very short testing time. This document proposes the use of two more appropriate test methodologies, the rotating cylinder electrode (RCE) and the flow loop (FL), to evaluate the performance of the corrosion inhibitor. For the FL, the selected flow rate was 1.2 m/s, the same rate that fluids have in oil company pipelines installed in Neuquén, Argentina. Firstly, according to the company’s protocol, inhibitors are required to have an efficiency greater than or equal to 90% in RCE tests; therefore, inhibitors that meet these requirements were tested in the FL test. Unlike the RCE test, the FL test represents the experimental conditions of the laboratory that are closest to reality, for the evaluation of the performance of the inhibitors used in the pipelines of the oil and gas industry. FL tests have several problems involving corrosion, erosion, abrasion, biphasic fluids, the time it takes for the inhibitor to become effective, and the duration of its effectiveness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/app13074586</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Abrasion ; Calcium chloride ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon steel ; Centrifugal force ; Chemical inhibitors ; Corrosion ; Corrosion inhibitors ; corrosion loop ; Corrosion potential ; Corrosion rate ; Corrosion tests ; Efficiency ; Electrochemistry ; Electrode polarization ; Electrodes ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Gas pipelines ; Hydrocarbons ; Inhibitors ; Laboratories ; Laboratory tests ; Linear polarization ; Magnesium chloride ; Oil and gas industry ; Petroleum pipelines ; Pipelines ; resistance to linear polarization ; Reynolds number ; rotating cylinder electrodes ; Rotating cylinders ; Shear stress ; Sodium chloride ; Steel ; Test procedures ; Testing time</subject><ispartof>Applied sciences, 2023-04, Vol.13 (7), p.4586</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef4633a11d974dc27a2c66b432d079d60063633e42886a65bf2978c9d12eb36d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6876-3157</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2799591577/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2799591577?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25744,27915,27916,37003,44581,74887</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acosta, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seijas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>A Combination of Laboratory Testing, RCE, and Corrosion Loop for Inhibitor Selection</title><title>Applied sciences</title><description>Corrosion inhibitors are evaluated in the oil industry with electrochemical tests of resistance to linear polarization with rotating cylinders following ASTM G170 and NACE 3T199 standards. With these tests, we can determine the corrosion rate (CR) and efficiency of corrosion inhibitors. In this work, a corrosion test protocol used by hydrocarbon-producing companies for the testing of corrosion inhibitors was used. This protocol consists of a 1045 carbon steel working electrode in a NACE solution composed of 9.62% NaCl, 0.45% CaCl2, 0.19% MgCl2, and 89.74% H2O, at a temperature of 65 °C and saturated with CO2. Each inhibitor tested was subjected to a series of 6000-4000-2000-4000-6000 rpm tests using rotating cylinder electrodes (RCEs). These electrochemical studies were carried out with the rotating cylinder to evaluate the ability of the inhibitor to prevent the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of a centrifugal force. In our opinion, this test does not provide corrosion engineers with enough information to be used as a predictive tool, since what is obtained is the CR in a very short testing time. This document proposes the use of two more appropriate test methodologies, the rotating cylinder electrode (RCE) and the flow loop (FL), to evaluate the performance of the corrosion inhibitor. For the FL, the selected flow rate was 1.2 m/s, the same rate that fluids have in oil company pipelines installed in Neuquén, Argentina. Firstly, according to the company’s protocol, inhibitors are required to have an efficiency greater than or equal to 90% in RCE tests; therefore, inhibitors that meet these requirements were tested in the FL test. Unlike the RCE test, the FL test represents the experimental conditions of the laboratory that are closest to reality, for the evaluation of the performance of the inhibitors used in the pipelines of the oil and gas industry. FL tests have several problems involving corrosion, erosion, abrasion, biphasic fluids, the time it takes for the inhibitor to become effective, and the duration of its effectiveness.</description><subject>Abrasion</subject><subject>Calcium chloride</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon steel</subject><subject>Centrifugal force</subject><subject>Chemical inhibitors</subject><subject>Corrosion</subject><subject>Corrosion inhibitors</subject><subject>corrosion loop</subject><subject>Corrosion potential</subject><subject>Corrosion rate</subject><subject>Corrosion tests</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Electrochemistry</subject><subject>Electrode polarization</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Gas pipelines</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Inhibitors</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory tests</subject><subject>Linear polarization</subject><subject>Magnesium chloride</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Petroleum pipelines</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>resistance to linear polarization</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>rotating cylinder electrodes</subject><subject>Rotating cylinders</subject><subject>Shear stress</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Test procedures</subject><subject>Testing time</subject><issn>2076-3417</issn><issn>2076-3417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtLAzEQgBdRsNSe_AMBj7Y1s8nmcSylaqEgaD2HbB41pd2s2e2h_97UinRymDB88zHJFMU94CkhEj_ptgWCOa0EuyoGJeZsQijw64v7bTHqui3OIYEIwINiPUPzuK9Do_sQGxQ9Wuk6Jt3HdERr1_Wh2YzR-3wxRrqxmU0pdidyFWOLfExo2XyFOmQefbidMyfNXXHj9a5zo788LD6fF-v562T19rKcz1YTQxj0E-cpI0QDWMmpNSXXpWGspqS0mEvLMGYkA46WQjDNqtqXkgsjLZSuJsySYbE8e23UW9WmsNfpqKIO6rcQ00bp1Aezc8qJCqisgHgtKHVUiLoGZsBxDASoy66Hs6tN8fuQH6628ZCaPL4quZSVhIrzTE3P1EZnaWh87JM2-Vi3DyY2zodcn_EKpMQgSW54PDeY_G9dcv5_TMDqtDZ1sTbyA8PWhto</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis</creator><creator>Acosta, Verónica</creator><creator>Seijas, Carlos</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-3157</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>A Combination of Laboratory Testing, RCE, and Corrosion Loop for Inhibitor Selection</title><author>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis ; Acosta, Verónica ; Seijas, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef4633a11d974dc27a2c66b432d079d60063633e42886a65bf2978c9d12eb36d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abrasion</topic><topic>Calcium chloride</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon steel</topic><topic>Centrifugal force</topic><topic>Chemical inhibitors</topic><topic>Corrosion</topic><topic>Corrosion inhibitors</topic><topic>corrosion loop</topic><topic>Corrosion potential</topic><topic>Corrosion rate</topic><topic>Corrosion tests</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Electrochemistry</topic><topic>Electrode polarization</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Gas pipelines</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Inhibitors</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory tests</topic><topic>Linear polarization</topic><topic>Magnesium chloride</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Petroleum pipelines</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>resistance to linear polarization</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>rotating cylinder electrodes</topic><topic>Rotating cylinders</topic><topic>Shear stress</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Test procedures</topic><topic>Testing time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acosta, Verónica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seijas, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bianchi, Gustavo Luis</au><au>Acosta, Verónica</au><au>Seijas, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Combination of Laboratory Testing, RCE, and Corrosion Loop for Inhibitor Selection</atitle><jtitle>Applied sciences</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4586</spage><pages>4586-</pages><issn>2076-3417</issn><eissn>2076-3417</eissn><abstract>Corrosion inhibitors are evaluated in the oil industry with electrochemical tests of resistance to linear polarization with rotating cylinders following ASTM G170 and NACE 3T199 standards. With these tests, we can determine the corrosion rate (CR) and efficiency of corrosion inhibitors. In this work, a corrosion test protocol used by hydrocarbon-producing companies for the testing of corrosion inhibitors was used. This protocol consists of a 1045 carbon steel working electrode in a NACE solution composed of 9.62% NaCl, 0.45% CaCl2, 0.19% MgCl2, and 89.74% H2O, at a temperature of 65 °C and saturated with CO2. Each inhibitor tested was subjected to a series of 6000-4000-2000-4000-6000 rpm tests using rotating cylinder electrodes (RCEs). These electrochemical studies were carried out with the rotating cylinder to evaluate the ability of the inhibitor to prevent the corrosion of carbon steel in the presence of a centrifugal force. In our opinion, this test does not provide corrosion engineers with enough information to be used as a predictive tool, since what is obtained is the CR in a very short testing time. This document proposes the use of two more appropriate test methodologies, the rotating cylinder electrode (RCE) and the flow loop (FL), to evaluate the performance of the corrosion inhibitor. For the FL, the selected flow rate was 1.2 m/s, the same rate that fluids have in oil company pipelines installed in Neuquén, Argentina. Firstly, according to the company’s protocol, inhibitors are required to have an efficiency greater than or equal to 90% in RCE tests; therefore, inhibitors that meet these requirements were tested in the FL test. Unlike the RCE test, the FL test represents the experimental conditions of the laboratory that are closest to reality, for the evaluation of the performance of the inhibitors used in the pipelines of the oil and gas industry. FL tests have several problems involving corrosion, erosion, abrasion, biphasic fluids, the time it takes for the inhibitor to become effective, and the duration of its effectiveness.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/app13074586</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-3157</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3417
ispartof Applied sciences, 2023-04, Vol.13 (7), p.4586
issn 2076-3417
2076-3417
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e85149513fa844e488bb16c1e701314e
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Abrasion
Calcium chloride
Carbon dioxide
Carbon steel
Centrifugal force
Chemical inhibitors
Corrosion
Corrosion inhibitors
corrosion loop
Corrosion potential
Corrosion rate
Corrosion tests
Efficiency
Electrochemistry
Electrode polarization
Electrodes
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Gas pipelines
Hydrocarbons
Inhibitors
Laboratories
Laboratory tests
Linear polarization
Magnesium chloride
Oil and gas industry
Petroleum pipelines
Pipelines
resistance to linear polarization
Reynolds number
rotating cylinder electrodes
Rotating cylinders
Shear stress
Sodium chloride
Steel
Test procedures
Testing time
title A Combination of Laboratory Testing, RCE, and Corrosion Loop for Inhibitor Selection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Combination%20of%20Laboratory%20Testing,%20RCE,%20and%20Corrosion%20Loop%20for%20Inhibitor%20Selection&rft.jtitle=Applied%20sciences&rft.au=Bianchi,%20Gustavo%20Luis&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4586&rft.pages=4586-&rft.issn=2076-3417&rft.eissn=2076-3417&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/app13074586&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA751990193%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-ef4633a11d974dc27a2c66b432d079d60063633e42886a65bf2978c9d12eb36d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2799591577&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A751990193&rfr_iscdi=true