Loading…

Reliability and Utility of Standard Gene Sequence Barcodes for the Identification and Differentiation of Cyst Nematodes of the Genus Heterodera

Difficulties inherent in the morphological identification of cyst nematodes of the genus Schmidt, 1871, an important lineage of plant parasites, has led to broad adoption of molecular methods for diagnosing and differentiating species. The pool of publicly available sequence data has grown significa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nematology 2022-07, Vol.54 (1), p.20220024-20220024
Main Authors: Huston, Daniel C., Khudhir, Manda, Hodda, Mike
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23
container_end_page 20220024
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20220024
container_title Journal of nematology
container_volume 54
creator Huston, Daniel C.
Khudhir, Manda
Hodda, Mike
description Difficulties inherent in the morphological identification of cyst nematodes of the genus Schmidt, 1871, an important lineage of plant parasites, has led to broad adoption of molecular methods for diagnosing and differentiating species. The pool of publicly available sequence data has grown significantly over the past few decades, and over half of all known species of have been characterized using one or more molecular markers commonly employed in DNA barcoding (18S, internal transcribed spacer [ITS], 28S, ). But how reliable are these data and how useful are these four markers for differentiating species? We downloaded all 18S, ITS, 28S, and gene sequences available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, GenBank, for all species of for which data were available. Using a combination of sequence comparison and tree-based phylogenetic methods, we evaluated this dataset for erroneous or otherwise problematic sequences and examined the utility of each molecular marker for the delineation of species. Although we find the rate of obviously erroneous sequences to be low, all four molecular markers failed to differentiate between at least one species pair. Our results suggest that while a combination of multiple markers is best for species identification, the marker shows the most utility for species differentiation and should be favored over 18S, ITS, and 28S, where resources are limited. Presently, less than half the valid species of have a sequence of available, and only a third have more than one sequence of this marker.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/jofnem-2022-0024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e886af9e5c7d493c806992eefa37ea2f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_e886af9e5c7d493c806992eefa37ea2f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2703418048</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kk9rFTEUxQdRbK3uXWbpZjT_JpMgCPqq7YOiYC24C5nMzWseM5OaZJT3KfzKZt4UsQtXOZzc8wu5nKp6SfBrylv5Zh_cBGNNMaU1xpQ_qk6p4LhmSnx__I8-qZ6ltMe4aCKeViesUW1DKT-tfn-FwZvODz4fkJl6dJNXHRy6zsUwsUcXMAG6hh8zTBbQBxNt6CEhFyLKt4C2PUzZO29N9mE6Us69cxAXe_UKbXNIGX2G0eRjuDhLtqDnhC4hQyx2NM-rJ84MCV7cn2fVzaeP3zaX9dWXi-3m_VVtuSK57oVUlhPKqMO4Ix0mjlPBJFeMuK78UspWcEoEboDLFjcKC9U4SQTjRnSUnVXbldsHs9d30Y8mHnQwXh-NEHfaxOztABqkFMYpaGzbF76VBaUogDOsBUNdYb1bWXdzN0Jvy7ejGR5AH95M_lbvwk-tGJMtIQXw6h4QQ1lyynr0ycIwmAnCnDRtMeNEYi7LKF5HbQwpRXB_nyFYL53Qayf00gm9dKJE3q6RX2Yoa-5hF-dDEWVyjlNZ8n-jDSfsD9Vlv2I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703418048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Utility of Standard Gene Sequence Barcodes for the Identification and Differentiation of Cyst Nematodes of the Genus Heterodera</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Huston, Daniel C. ; Khudhir, Manda ; Hodda, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Huston, Daniel C. ; Khudhir, Manda ; Hodda, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>Difficulties inherent in the morphological identification of cyst nematodes of the genus Schmidt, 1871, an important lineage of plant parasites, has led to broad adoption of molecular methods for diagnosing and differentiating species. The pool of publicly available sequence data has grown significantly over the past few decades, and over half of all known species of have been characterized using one or more molecular markers commonly employed in DNA barcoding (18S, internal transcribed spacer [ITS], 28S, ). But how reliable are these data and how useful are these four markers for differentiating species? We downloaded all 18S, ITS, 28S, and gene sequences available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, GenBank, for all species of for which data were available. Using a combination of sequence comparison and tree-based phylogenetic methods, we evaluated this dataset for erroneous or otherwise problematic sequences and examined the utility of each molecular marker for the delineation of species. Although we find the rate of obviously erroneous sequences to be low, all four molecular markers failed to differentiate between at least one species pair. Our results suggest that while a combination of multiple markers is best for species identification, the marker shows the most utility for species differentiation and should be favored over 18S, ITS, and 28S, where resources are limited. Presently, less than half the valid species of have a sequence of available, and only a third have more than one sequence of this marker.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2640-396X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0022-300X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2640-396X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/jofnem-2022-0024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35975224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sciendo</publisher><subject>detection ; diagnosis ; genetics ; molecular biology ; Research Paper ; systematics ; taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of nematology, 2022-07, Vol.54 (1), p.20220024-20220024</ispartof><rights>2022 Huston et al. published by Sciendo 2022 Huston et al. published by Sciendo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338711/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9338711/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huston, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khudhir, Manda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodda, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Utility of Standard Gene Sequence Barcodes for the Identification and Differentiation of Cyst Nematodes of the Genus Heterodera</title><title>Journal of nematology</title><description>Difficulties inherent in the morphological identification of cyst nematodes of the genus Schmidt, 1871, an important lineage of plant parasites, has led to broad adoption of molecular methods for diagnosing and differentiating species. The pool of publicly available sequence data has grown significantly over the past few decades, and over half of all known species of have been characterized using one or more molecular markers commonly employed in DNA barcoding (18S, internal transcribed spacer [ITS], 28S, ). But how reliable are these data and how useful are these four markers for differentiating species? We downloaded all 18S, ITS, 28S, and gene sequences available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, GenBank, for all species of for which data were available. Using a combination of sequence comparison and tree-based phylogenetic methods, we evaluated this dataset for erroneous or otherwise problematic sequences and examined the utility of each molecular marker for the delineation of species. Although we find the rate of obviously erroneous sequences to be low, all four molecular markers failed to differentiate between at least one species pair. Our results suggest that while a combination of multiple markers is best for species identification, the marker shows the most utility for species differentiation and should be favored over 18S, ITS, and 28S, where resources are limited. Presently, less than half the valid species of have a sequence of available, and only a third have more than one sequence of this marker.</description><subject>detection</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>genetics</subject><subject>molecular biology</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><subject>systematics</subject><subject>taxonomy</subject><issn>2640-396X</issn><issn>0022-300X</issn><issn>2640-396X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kk9rFTEUxQdRbK3uXWbpZjT_JpMgCPqq7YOiYC24C5nMzWseM5OaZJT3KfzKZt4UsQtXOZzc8wu5nKp6SfBrylv5Zh_cBGNNMaU1xpQ_qk6p4LhmSnx__I8-qZ6ltMe4aCKeViesUW1DKT-tfn-FwZvODz4fkJl6dJNXHRy6zsUwsUcXMAG6hh8zTBbQBxNt6CEhFyLKt4C2PUzZO29N9mE6Us69cxAXe_UKbXNIGX2G0eRjuDhLtqDnhC4hQyx2NM-rJ84MCV7cn2fVzaeP3zaX9dWXi-3m_VVtuSK57oVUlhPKqMO4Ix0mjlPBJFeMuK78UspWcEoEboDLFjcKC9U4SQTjRnSUnVXbldsHs9d30Y8mHnQwXh-NEHfaxOztABqkFMYpaGzbF76VBaUogDOsBUNdYb1bWXdzN0Jvy7ejGR5AH95M_lbvwk-tGJMtIQXw6h4QQ1lyynr0ycIwmAnCnDRtMeNEYi7LKF5HbQwpRXB_nyFYL53Qayf00gm9dKJE3q6RX2Yoa-5hF-dDEWVyjlNZ8n-jDSfsD9Vlv2I</recordid><startdate>20220729</startdate><enddate>20220729</enddate><creator>Huston, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Khudhir, Manda</creator><creator>Hodda, Mike</creator><general>Sciendo</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220729</creationdate><title>Reliability and Utility of Standard Gene Sequence Barcodes for the Identification and Differentiation of Cyst Nematodes of the Genus Heterodera</title><author>Huston, Daniel C. ; Khudhir, Manda ; Hodda, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>detection</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>genetics</topic><topic>molecular biology</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><topic>systematics</topic><topic>taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huston, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khudhir, Manda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodda, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of nematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huston, Daniel C.</au><au>Khudhir, Manda</au><au>Hodda, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Utility of Standard Gene Sequence Barcodes for the Identification and Differentiation of Cyst Nematodes of the Genus Heterodera</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nematology</jtitle><date>2022-07-29</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20220024</spage><epage>20220024</epage><pages>20220024-20220024</pages><issn>2640-396X</issn><issn>0022-300X</issn><eissn>2640-396X</eissn><abstract>Difficulties inherent in the morphological identification of cyst nematodes of the genus Schmidt, 1871, an important lineage of plant parasites, has led to broad adoption of molecular methods for diagnosing and differentiating species. The pool of publicly available sequence data has grown significantly over the past few decades, and over half of all known species of have been characterized using one or more molecular markers commonly employed in DNA barcoding (18S, internal transcribed spacer [ITS], 28S, ). But how reliable are these data and how useful are these four markers for differentiating species? We downloaded all 18S, ITS, 28S, and gene sequences available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database, GenBank, for all species of for which data were available. Using a combination of sequence comparison and tree-based phylogenetic methods, we evaluated this dataset for erroneous or otherwise problematic sequences and examined the utility of each molecular marker for the delineation of species. Although we find the rate of obviously erroneous sequences to be low, all four molecular markers failed to differentiate between at least one species pair. Our results suggest that while a combination of multiple markers is best for species identification, the marker shows the most utility for species differentiation and should be favored over 18S, ITS, and 28S, where resources are limited. Presently, less than half the valid species of have a sequence of available, and only a third have more than one sequence of this marker.</abstract><pub>Sciendo</pub><pmid>35975224</pmid><doi>10.2478/jofnem-2022-0024</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2640-396X
ispartof Journal of nematology, 2022-07, Vol.54 (1), p.20220024-20220024
issn 2640-396X
0022-300X
2640-396X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e886af9e5c7d493c806992eefa37ea2f
source PubMed Central
subjects detection
diagnosis
genetics
molecular biology
Research Paper
systematics
taxonomy
title Reliability and Utility of Standard Gene Sequence Barcodes for the Identification and Differentiation of Cyst Nematodes of the Genus Heterodera
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Utility%20of%20Standard%20Gene%20Sequence%20Barcodes%20for%20the%20Identification%20and%20Differentiation%20of%20Cyst%20Nematodes%20of%20the%20Genus%20Heterodera&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nematology&rft.au=Huston,%20Daniel%20C.&rft.date=2022-07-29&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20220024&rft.epage=20220024&rft.pages=20220024-20220024&rft.issn=2640-396X&rft.eissn=2640-396X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2703418048%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-d689c41232f00b1b01f426384931fb9618876421605e4870590695f81634a6b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703418048&rft_id=info:pmid/35975224&rfr_iscdi=true