Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study

Objective To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. Methods Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology 2022-02, Vol.7 (1), p.43-46
Main Authors: Ruiz Medina, Leonardo, Moshtaghi, Omid, Kuang, Jessica, Schalch Lepe, Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
bipolar electrocautery
Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
ENTceps
monopolar electrocautery
Original Research
Particle size
SARS‐CoV‐2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
Surgery
thermal welding device
tonsillectomy
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. Methods Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) thermal welding device (TWD). Each device was applied to fresh cadaveric cow tongue and porcine nose. Aerosolized particles produced by these devices were measured using a calibrated electronic particle counter. Measurements were recorded over the course of 3 minutes. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. Results In comparing types of tissues and particle sizes, TWD had the lowest aerosolizing burden among the three devices. By analyzing the highest particle value of TWD against both monopolar and bipolar, monopolar electrocautery proved to have the highest aerosolization exposure with statistical significance at 0.5 and 10 μm. No statistical significance was found when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery. Discussion Our study demonstrates there is a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device utilized. TWD proved to have the lowest burden whereas monopolar electrocautery had the highest. Conclusion TWD produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. Level of Evidence 2.
ISSN:2378-8038
2378-8038
DOI:10.1002/lio2.716