Prehospital ultrasound scanning for abdominal free fluid detection in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: BMC emergency medicine 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.7-7, Article 7
• Main Authors: Lin, Kun-Te, Lin, Zih-Yang, Huang, Cheng-Chieh, Yu, Shang-Yan, Huang, Jing-Lan, Lin, Jian-Houng, Lin, Yan-Ren
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; Abdomen - diagnostic imaging; Bias; Chi-square test; Comparative analysis; Computed tomography; CT imaging; Databases, Factual; Decision making; Diagnosis; Diagnostic imaging; Emergency Medical Services; FAST; Hemoperitoneum; Hemoperitoneum - diagnostic imaging; Hemothorax; Hospitals; Humans; Literature reviews; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Meta-analysis; Observational studies; Patients; Pneumothorax; Prehospital; Quality assessment; Quality control; Scanning; Systematic review; Trauma; Ultrasonic imaging; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound; Ultrasound imaging
• ISSN: 1471-227X; 1471-227X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12873-023-00919-2

Focused assessment with sonography for trauma helps detect abdominal free fluid. Prehospital ultrasound scanning is also important because the early diagnosis of hemoperitoneum may reduce the time to definitive treatment in the hospital. This study investigated whether prehospital ultrasound scanning can help detect abdominal free fluid. In this systematic review, relevant databases were searched for studies investigating prehospital ultrasound examinations for abdominal free fluid in trauma patients. The prehospital ultrasound results were compared with computed tomography, surgery, or hospital ultrasound examination data. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values were analyzed using forest plots. The overall predictive power was calculated by the summary receiver operating characteristic curve. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) was performed to assess the certainty of evidence. This meta-analysis comprised six studies that included 1356 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.596 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.345-0.822) and 0.970 (95% CI = 0.953-0.983), respectively. The pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.998. The quality assessment tool showed favorable results. In the GRADE analysis, the quality of evidence was very low for sensitivity and high for specificity when prehospital ultrasound was used for hemoperitoneum diagnosis. The specificity of abdominal free fluid detection using prehospital ultrasound examinations in trauma patients was very high.