Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for Palliative Care in German Comprehensive Cancer Centers - an evaluation of the implementation status

• Published in: BMC palliative care 2020-05, Vol.19 (1), p.62-62, Article 62
• Main Authors: Lödel, Sarah, Ostgathe, Christoph, Heckel, Maria, Oechsle, Karin, Gahr, Susanne
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis; Anesthesia; Cancer; Cancer Care Facilities - organization & administration; Cancer Care Facilities - standards; Cancer therapies; Clinical medicine; Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC); Female; Germany; Hospice care; Humans; Implementation status; Internet; Male; Market surveys; Medical research; Middle Aged; Neoplasms - therapy; Palliative Care; Palliative Care - methods; Patients; Physicians; Polls & surveys; Program Evaluation - methods; Standard of Care - trends; Standard Operating Procedure (SOP); Survey; Surveys; Surveys and Questionnaires; Symptoms; Web sites; Working groups
• ISSN: 1472-684X; 1472-684X
• DOI: 10.1186/s12904-020-00565-6

The working group for palliative medicine within the Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) network funded by the German Cancer Aid in Germany has developed and published 14 Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for palliative care in CCCs. This study analyzed to what extent these SOPs have been implemented in the clinical routine in the CCC network one year after their publication. An online-based survey on the implementation status, limitations in daily practice and further themes was conducted between April and July 2018. In total, 125 health professionals in specialized palliative care from all 16 CCC locations were invited to participate. The data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS. The response rate was 52.8%. More than half of the respondents (57.6%) knew about the free availability of SOPs on the CCC network website. The extent to which each SOP was being used actively in practice by the survey respondents ranged from a low of 22.7% (for the "Fatigue" SOP) to a highest of 48.5% (for the "Palliative Sedation" and "Respiratory Distress" SOPs). The respondents became aware of the SOP through recommendations from colleagues, team meetings or from the head of the department. The SOPs "Respiratory distress of an adult palliative patient" and "Palliative sedation" were perceived as the most practically oriented and understandable. Barriers to use SOPs were mainly limited time resources and lack of knowledge of existence and availability. In practice, better knowledge about the SOPs and at the same time increased use can be achieved through systematic training or discussion of SOPs in regular team meetings. There is a need to take measures to optimize the implementation in clinical practice.