Reconciling human health with the environment while struggling against the COVID-19 pandemic through improved face mask eco-design

• Published in: Scientific reports 2022-02, Vol.12 (1), p.2445-2445, Article 2445
• Main Authors: Morone, Piergiuseppe, Yilan, Gülşah, Imbert, Enrica, Becchetti, Leonardo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 631/158/2165; 704/172/4081; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - epidemiology; COVID-19 - prevention & control; COVID-19 - virology; Disposable Equipment - standards; Ecosystem; Energy requirements; Environment; Environmental impact; Equipment Reuse - standards; Face; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Life cycle analysis; Life cycles; Masks; Masks - classification; Masks - standards; multidisciplinary; Pandemics; Pandemics - prevention & control; Personal Protective Equipment - classification; Personal Protective Equipment - standards; Protective equipment; Public Health - methods; Raw materials; SARS-CoV-2 - physiology; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sustainable design; Sustainable materials; Textiles - classification; Textiles - standards; Waste disposal
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06536-6

Surgical masks have become critical for protecting human health against the COVID-19 pandemic, even though their environmental burden is a matter of ongoing debate. This study aimed at shedding light on the environmental impacts of single-use (i.e., MD-Type I) versus reusable (i.e., MD-Type IIR) face masks via a comparative life cycle assessment with a cradle-to-grave system boundary. We adopted a two-level analysis using the ReCiPe (H) method, considering both midpoint and endpoint categories. The results showed that reusable face masks created fewer impacts for most midpoint categories. At the endpoint level, reusable face masks were superior to single-use masks, producing scores of 16.16 and 84.20 MPt, respectively. The main environmental impacts of single-use masks were linked to raw material consumption, energy requirements and waste disposal, while the use phase and raw material consumption made the most significant contribution for reusable type. However, our results showed that lower environmental impacts of reusable face masks strongly depend on the use phase since reusable face masks lost their superior performance when the hand wash scenario was tested. Improvement of mask eco-design emerged as another key factor such as using more sustainable raw materials and designing better waste disposal scenarios could significantly lower the environmental impacts.