Loading…

MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRIES PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF EDAS BASED ON THE ENTROPY WEIGHT

Insurance industries have grown remarkably since the late 1990s. Governments require a benchmarking tool to measure their insurance industry's performance according to specific various indicators. The best practice benchmarking of insurance can be achieved by evaluating numerous insurance indus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal for Quality Research 2020-01, Vol.14 (4), p.1097-1114
Main Author: Almulhim, Tarifa S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-3339c6a4bc61b9e75203f3c2b4a0739958e3c031c5de249ff4aa91b2606337153
cites
container_end_page 1114
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1097
container_title International Journal for Quality Research
container_volume 14
creator Almulhim, Tarifa S.
description Insurance industries have grown remarkably since the late 1990s. Governments require a benchmarking tool to measure their insurance industry's performance according to specific various indicators. The best practice benchmarking of insurance can be achieved by evaluating numerous insurance industries through prioritizing and identifying the top industries. This paper presents a multi-criteria evaluation framework for insurance performance of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries by investigating conflicting and incommensurate insurance indicators for the period of 2010-2017. For the basis of the evaluation, eight main insurance performance inductors were identified and then their weights were determined using the entropy method. The resultant entropy weights were then applied in the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method for determining preferential rankings of insurance industries. The ranked insurance industries were classified into groups of similar levels of performance. Sensitivity analysis was applied to the main criteria to examine the robustness of the prioritizing results. The results indicate insurance markets in United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan are ranked higher than the remaining 25 OECD countries.
doi_str_mv 10.24874/IJQR14.04-07
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ea73493b870d449e821133f03863d173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ea73493b870d449e821133f03863d173</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2555179348</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-3339c6a4bc61b9e75203f3c2b4a0739958e3c031c5de249ff4aa91b2606337153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1Lw0AUDKKgaI_eFzxH3-Ztsllva7u1K2mi-VA8LZt0Iy1qalIP_nujFWHgDcO8eQ_G884pXAYs5uxK3z3klF0C84EfeCc0BvA543j4xyMWwrE3GYYNAFAeMeTsxHtfVkmp_WmuS5VrSdSjTCpZ6iwl2ZzotKhymU7VyGZVUeZaFeRe5fMsX_7I10SmI2TyXOjiZ0HNZEFuZKFmZEwoF4qotMyz-2fypPTtojzzjlr7OrjJ3zz1qrkqpws_yW71VCZ-gxx2PiKKJrKsbiJaC8fDALDFJqiZBY5ChLHDBpA24coFTLQts1bQOoggQuQ0xFNP73NXnd2Ybb9-s_2X6eza_Apd_2Jsv1s3r844y5EJrGMOK8aEiwNKEVvAOMIV5ThmXeyztn338emGndl0n_37-L4JwjCkXCCLR5e_dzV9Nwy9a_-vUjC_DZl9QwZGcPwG7hR29w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555179348</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRIES PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF EDAS BASED ON THE ENTROPY WEIGHT</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</creatorcontrib><description>Insurance industries have grown remarkably since the late 1990s. Governments require a benchmarking tool to measure their insurance industry's performance according to specific various indicators. The best practice benchmarking of insurance can be achieved by evaluating numerous insurance industries through prioritizing and identifying the top industries. This paper presents a multi-criteria evaluation framework for insurance performance of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries by investigating conflicting and incommensurate insurance indicators for the period of 2010-2017. For the basis of the evaluation, eight main insurance performance inductors were identified and then their weights were determined using the entropy method. The resultant entropy weights were then applied in the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method for determining preferential rankings of insurance industries. The ranked insurance industries were classified into groups of similar levels of performance. Sensitivity analysis was applied to the main criteria to examine the robustness of the prioritizing results. The results indicate insurance markets in United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan are ranked higher than the remaining 25 OECD countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1800-6450</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1800-7473</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24874/IJQR14.04-07</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kragujevac: University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Engineering</publisher><subject>Benchmarks ; Best practice ; edas ; Entropy ; Indicators ; Inductors ; Insurance ; insurance industries ; multi-criteria decision-making ; Multiple criterion ; oecd countries ; Sensitivity analysis ; shannon's entropy</subject><ispartof>International Journal for Quality Research, 2020-01, Vol.14 (4), p.1097-1114</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-3339c6a4bc61b9e75203f3c2b4a0739958e3c031c5de249ff4aa91b2606337153</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0228-1462</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2555179348?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25728,27898,27899,36986,44563</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</creatorcontrib><title>MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRIES PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF EDAS BASED ON THE ENTROPY WEIGHT</title><title>International Journal for Quality Research</title><description>Insurance industries have grown remarkably since the late 1990s. Governments require a benchmarking tool to measure their insurance industry's performance according to specific various indicators. The best practice benchmarking of insurance can be achieved by evaluating numerous insurance industries through prioritizing and identifying the top industries. This paper presents a multi-criteria evaluation framework for insurance performance of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries by investigating conflicting and incommensurate insurance indicators for the period of 2010-2017. For the basis of the evaluation, eight main insurance performance inductors were identified and then their weights were determined using the entropy method. The resultant entropy weights were then applied in the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method for determining preferential rankings of insurance industries. The ranked insurance industries were classified into groups of similar levels of performance. Sensitivity analysis was applied to the main criteria to examine the robustness of the prioritizing results. The results indicate insurance markets in United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan are ranked higher than the remaining 25 OECD countries.</description><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>edas</subject><subject>Entropy</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Inductors</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>insurance industries</subject><subject>multi-criteria decision-making</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>oecd countries</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>shannon's entropy</subject><issn>1800-6450</issn><issn>1800-7473</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UU1Lw0AUDKKgaI_eFzxH3-Ztsllva7u1K2mi-VA8LZt0Iy1qalIP_nujFWHgDcO8eQ_G884pXAYs5uxK3z3klF0C84EfeCc0BvA543j4xyMWwrE3GYYNAFAeMeTsxHtfVkmp_WmuS5VrSdSjTCpZ6iwl2ZzotKhymU7VyGZVUeZaFeRe5fMsX_7I10SmI2TyXOjiZ0HNZEFuZKFmZEwoF4qotMyz-2fypPTtojzzjlr7OrjJ3zz1qrkqpws_yW71VCZ-gxx2PiKKJrKsbiJaC8fDALDFJqiZBY5ChLHDBpA24coFTLQts1bQOoggQuQ0xFNP73NXnd2Ybb9-s_2X6eza_Apd_2Jsv1s3r844y5EJrGMOK8aEiwNKEVvAOMIV5ThmXeyztn338emGndl0n_37-L4JwjCkXCCLR5e_dzV9Nwy9a_-vUjC_DZl9QwZGcPwG7hR29w</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</creator><general>University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Engineering</general><general>Center for Quality, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kragujevac, Serbia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0228-1462</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRIES PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF EDAS BASED ON THE ENTROPY WEIGHT</title><author>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-3339c6a4bc61b9e75203f3c2b4a0739958e3c031c5de249ff4aa91b2606337153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>edas</topic><topic>Entropy</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Inductors</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>insurance industries</topic><topic>multi-criteria decision-making</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>oecd countries</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>shannon's entropy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International Journal for Quality Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Almulhim, Tarifa S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRIES PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF EDAS BASED ON THE ENTROPY WEIGHT</atitle><jtitle>International Journal for Quality Research</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1097</spage><epage>1114</epage><pages>1097-1114</pages><issn>1800-6450</issn><eissn>1800-7473</eissn><abstract>Insurance industries have grown remarkably since the late 1990s. Governments require a benchmarking tool to measure their insurance industry's performance according to specific various indicators. The best practice benchmarking of insurance can be achieved by evaluating numerous insurance industries through prioritizing and identifying the top industries. This paper presents a multi-criteria evaluation framework for insurance performance of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries by investigating conflicting and incommensurate insurance indicators for the period of 2010-2017. For the basis of the evaluation, eight main insurance performance inductors were identified and then their weights were determined using the entropy method. The resultant entropy weights were then applied in the evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) method for determining preferential rankings of insurance industries. The ranked insurance industries were classified into groups of similar levels of performance. Sensitivity analysis was applied to the main criteria to examine the robustness of the prioritizing results. The results indicate insurance markets in United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, and Japan are ranked higher than the remaining 25 OECD countries.</abstract><cop>Kragujevac</cop><pub>University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Engineering</pub><doi>10.24874/IJQR14.04-07</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0228-1462</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1800-6450
ispartof International Journal for Quality Research, 2020-01, Vol.14 (4), p.1097-1114
issn 1800-6450
1800-7473
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ea73493b870d449e821133f03863d173
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Benchmarks
Best practice
edas
Entropy
Indicators
Inductors
Insurance
insurance industries
multi-criteria decision-making
Multiple criterion
oecd countries
Sensitivity analysis
shannon's entropy
title MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF INSURANCE INDUSTRIES PERFORMANCE: AN ANALYSIS OF EDAS BASED ON THE ENTROPY WEIGHT
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-04T19%3A17%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MULTI-CRITERIA%20EVALUATION%20OF%20INSURANCE%20INDUSTRIES%20PERFORMANCE:%20AN%20ANALYSIS%20OF%20EDAS%20BASED%20ON%20THE%20ENTROPY%20WEIGHT&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20for%20Quality%20Research&rft.au=Almulhim,%20Tarifa%20S.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1097&rft.epage=1114&rft.pages=1097-1114&rft.issn=1800-6450&rft.eissn=1800-7473&rft_id=info:doi/10.24874/IJQR14.04-07&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2555179348%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-3339c6a4bc61b9e75203f3c2b4a0739958e3c031c5de249ff4aa91b2606337153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555179348&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true