Loading…
CT radiomic features for predicting resectability of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma as given by feature analysis: a case control study
Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in all stages of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) management. Compared to basic CT features, CT radiomic features can objectively obtain more information about intratumour heterogeneity. Although CT radiomics has been proved useful for predicting tr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cancer imaging 2019-10, Vol.19 (1), p.66-66, Article 66 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733 |
container_end_page | 66 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 66 |
container_title | Cancer imaging |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Ou, Jing Li, Rui Zeng, Rui Wu, Chang-Qiang Chen, Yong Chen, Tian-Wu Zhang, Xiao-Ming Wu, Lan Jiang, Yu Yang, Jian-Qiong Cao, Jin-Ming Tang, Sun Tang, Meng-Jie Hu, Jiani |
description | Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in all stages of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) management. Compared to basic CT features, CT radiomic features can objectively obtain more information about intratumour heterogeneity. Although CT radiomics has been proved useful for predicting treatment response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer, the best way to use CT radiomic biomarkers as predictive markers for determining resectability of oesophageal SCC remains to be developed. This study aimed to develop CT radiomic features related to resectability of oesophageal SCC with five predictive models and to determine the most predictive model.
Five hundred ninety-one patients with oesophageal SCC undergoing contrast-enhanced CT were enrolled in this study, and were composed by 270 resectable cases and 321 unresectable cases. Of the 270 resectable oesophageal SCCs, 91 cases were primary resectable tumours; and the remained 179 cases received neoadjuvant therapy after CT, shrank on therapy, and changed to resectable tumours. Four hundred thirteen oesophageal SCCs including 189 resectable cancers and 224 unresectable cancers were randomly allocated to the training cohort; and 178 oesophageal SCCs including 81 resectable tumours and 97 unresectable tumours were allocated to the validation group. Four hundred ninety-five radiomic features were extracted from CT data for identifying resectability of oesophageal SCC. Useful radiomic features were generated by dimension reduction using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The optimal radiomic features were chosen using multivariable logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, X-Gradient boost and decision tree classifiers. Discriminating performance was assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F-1score.
Eight radiomic features were selected to create radiomic models related to resectability of oesophageal SCC (P-values |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s40644-019-0254-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_eae9362064b345808aa82cfde8160cd2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A603308908</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_eae9362064b345808aa82cfde8160cd2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A603308908</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1q3DAUhU1padK0D9BNERRKN04lS5alLgJh6E8g0E26FtfytUeDbU0kOzDP0JeOnEnSmVK0kLg69xP36GTZe0bPGVPySxRUCpFTpnNalOnwIjtloqJ5xTl9eXA-yd7EuKG00EpXr7MTziTTha5Osz-rGxKgcX5wlrQI0xwwktYHsg3YODu5sSOphHaC2vVu2hHfEo_Rb9fQIfQk3s4w-DkSi31PLATrRj8AgUg6d4cjqXdPYAIj9Lvo4lcCSRmRWD9OwSfINDe7t9mrFvqI7x73s-z39283q5_59a8fV6vL69yWmk25xLasq1JIS0UhoOSlKpuGsTbNJAta1LVWvKysKAtrK2p1zWvkwGVVIdfJjrPsas9tPGzMNrgBws54cOah4ENnIEzO9mgQUPMElaLmolRUAajCtg0qJqltisS62LO2cz1gYzHNA_0R9PhmdGvT-TsjKy2Fognw-REQ_O2McTKDi4uVMGJy1RQ8PZ6kQiXpx3-kGz-HZOlepbgumPyr6iAN4MbWp3ftAjWXkqYwKE0X1vl_VGk1mJLgR2xdqh81fDpoWKefn9bR9_Pk_BiPhWwvtMHHGLB9NoNRs8TW7GNrUmzNEluzmPDh0MXnjqec8nueSeec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2306839216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CT radiomic features for predicting resectability of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma as given by feature analysis: a case control study</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Ou, Jing ; Li, Rui ; Zeng, Rui ; Wu, Chang-Qiang ; Chen, Yong ; Chen, Tian-Wu ; Zhang, Xiao-Ming ; Wu, Lan ; Jiang, Yu ; Yang, Jian-Qiong ; Cao, Jin-Ming ; Tang, Sun ; Tang, Meng-Jie ; Hu, Jiani</creator><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jing ; Li, Rui ; Zeng, Rui ; Wu, Chang-Qiang ; Chen, Yong ; Chen, Tian-Wu ; Zhang, Xiao-Ming ; Wu, Lan ; Jiang, Yu ; Yang, Jian-Qiong ; Cao, Jin-Ming ; Tang, Sun ; Tang, Meng-Jie ; Hu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><description>Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in all stages of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) management. Compared to basic CT features, CT radiomic features can objectively obtain more information about intratumour heterogeneity. Although CT radiomics has been proved useful for predicting treatment response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer, the best way to use CT radiomic biomarkers as predictive markers for determining resectability of oesophageal SCC remains to be developed. This study aimed to develop CT radiomic features related to resectability of oesophageal SCC with five predictive models and to determine the most predictive model.
Five hundred ninety-one patients with oesophageal SCC undergoing contrast-enhanced CT were enrolled in this study, and were composed by 270 resectable cases and 321 unresectable cases. Of the 270 resectable oesophageal SCCs, 91 cases were primary resectable tumours; and the remained 179 cases received neoadjuvant therapy after CT, shrank on therapy, and changed to resectable tumours. Four hundred thirteen oesophageal SCCs including 189 resectable cancers and 224 unresectable cancers were randomly allocated to the training cohort; and 178 oesophageal SCCs including 81 resectable tumours and 97 unresectable tumours were allocated to the validation group. Four hundred ninety-five radiomic features were extracted from CT data for identifying resectability of oesophageal SCC. Useful radiomic features were generated by dimension reduction using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The optimal radiomic features were chosen using multivariable logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, X-Gradient boost and decision tree classifiers. Discriminating performance was assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F-1score.
Eight radiomic features were selected to create radiomic models related to resectability of oesophageal SCC (P-values < 0.01 for both cohorts). Multivariable logistic regression model showed the best performance (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.87 ± 0.02, accuracy = 0.87 and 0.86, and F-1score = 0.93 and 0.86 in training and validation cohorts, respectively) in comparison with any other model (P-value < 0.001). Good calibration was observed for multivariable logistic regression model.
CT radiomic models could help predict resectability of oesophageal SCC, and multivariable logistic regression model is the most predictive model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-5025</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0254-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31619297</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Age ; Analysis ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Biopsy ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Cancer treatment ; Carcinoma ; Case-Control Studies ; CAT scans ; Chemotherapy ; Computed tomography ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic imaging ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery ; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - surgery ; Esophagectomy ; Esophagectomy - methods ; Esophagus ; Feature extraction ; Female ; Humans ; Lymphatic system ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Medical records ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant therapy ; Patients ; Radiation therapy ; Radiomics ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Squamous cell carcinoma ; Support vector machines ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Therapy ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Training ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer imaging, 2019-10, Vol.19 (1), p.66-66, Article 66</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5776-3429</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6796480/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2306839216?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31619297$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chang-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tian-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jian-Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Jin-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Meng-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><title>CT radiomic features for predicting resectability of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma as given by feature analysis: a case control study</title><title>Cancer imaging</title><addtitle>Cancer Imaging</addtitle><description>Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in all stages of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) management. Compared to basic CT features, CT radiomic features can objectively obtain more information about intratumour heterogeneity. Although CT radiomics has been proved useful for predicting treatment response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer, the best way to use CT radiomic biomarkers as predictive markers for determining resectability of oesophageal SCC remains to be developed. This study aimed to develop CT radiomic features related to resectability of oesophageal SCC with five predictive models and to determine the most predictive model.
Five hundred ninety-one patients with oesophageal SCC undergoing contrast-enhanced CT were enrolled in this study, and were composed by 270 resectable cases and 321 unresectable cases. Of the 270 resectable oesophageal SCCs, 91 cases were primary resectable tumours; and the remained 179 cases received neoadjuvant therapy after CT, shrank on therapy, and changed to resectable tumours. Four hundred thirteen oesophageal SCCs including 189 resectable cancers and 224 unresectable cancers were randomly allocated to the training cohort; and 178 oesophageal SCCs including 81 resectable tumours and 97 unresectable tumours were allocated to the validation group. Four hundred ninety-five radiomic features were extracted from CT data for identifying resectability of oesophageal SCC. Useful radiomic features were generated by dimension reduction using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The optimal radiomic features were chosen using multivariable logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, X-Gradient boost and decision tree classifiers. Discriminating performance was assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F-1score.
Eight radiomic features were selected to create radiomic models related to resectability of oesophageal SCC (P-values < 0.01 for both cohorts). Multivariable logistic regression model showed the best performance (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.87 ± 0.02, accuracy = 0.87 and 0.86, and F-1score = 0.93 and 0.86 in training and validation cohorts, respectively) in comparison with any other model (P-value < 0.001). Good calibration was observed for multivariable logistic regression model.
CT radiomic models could help predict resectability of oesophageal SCC, and multivariable logistic regression model is the most predictive model.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cancer treatment</subject><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>CAT scans</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagectomy</subject><subject>Esophagectomy - methods</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Feature extraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Squamous cell carcinoma</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><issn>1470-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1q3DAUhU1padK0D9BNERRKN04lS5alLgJh6E8g0E26FtfytUeDbU0kOzDP0JeOnEnSmVK0kLg69xP36GTZe0bPGVPySxRUCpFTpnNalOnwIjtloqJ5xTl9eXA-yd7EuKG00EpXr7MTziTTha5Osz-rGxKgcX5wlrQI0xwwktYHsg3YODu5sSOphHaC2vVu2hHfEo_Rb9fQIfQk3s4w-DkSi31PLATrRj8AgUg6d4cjqXdPYAIj9Lvo4lcCSRmRWD9OwSfINDe7t9mrFvqI7x73s-z39283q5_59a8fV6vL69yWmk25xLasq1JIS0UhoOSlKpuGsTbNJAta1LVWvKysKAtrK2p1zWvkwGVVIdfJjrPsas9tPGzMNrgBws54cOah4ENnIEzO9mgQUPMElaLmolRUAajCtg0qJqltisS62LO2cz1gYzHNA_0R9PhmdGvT-TsjKy2Fognw-REQ_O2McTKDi4uVMGJy1RQ8PZ6kQiXpx3-kGz-HZOlepbgumPyr6iAN4MbWp3ftAjWXkqYwKE0X1vl_VGk1mJLgR2xdqh81fDpoWKefn9bR9_Pk_BiPhWwvtMHHGLB9NoNRs8TW7GNrUmzNEluzmPDh0MXnjqec8nueSeec</recordid><startdate>20191016</startdate><enddate>20191016</enddate><creator>Ou, Jing</creator><creator>Li, Rui</creator><creator>Zeng, Rui</creator><creator>Wu, Chang-Qiang</creator><creator>Chen, Yong</creator><creator>Chen, Tian-Wu</creator><creator>Zhang, Xiao-Ming</creator><creator>Wu, Lan</creator><creator>Jiang, Yu</creator><creator>Yang, Jian-Qiong</creator><creator>Cao, Jin-Ming</creator><creator>Tang, Sun</creator><creator>Tang, Meng-Jie</creator><creator>Hu, Jiani</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-3429</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191016</creationdate><title>CT radiomic features for predicting resectability of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma as given by feature analysis: a case control study</title><author>Ou, Jing ; Li, Rui ; Zeng, Rui ; Wu, Chang-Qiang ; Chen, Yong ; Chen, Tian-Wu ; Zhang, Xiao-Ming ; Wu, Lan ; Jiang, Yu ; Yang, Jian-Qiong ; Cao, Jin-Ming ; Tang, Sun ; Tang, Meng-Jie ; Hu, Jiani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cancer treatment</topic><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>CAT scans</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagectomy</topic><topic>Esophagectomy - methods</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Feature extraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Squamous cell carcinoma</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ou, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chang-Qiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Tian-Wu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xiao-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Lan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Jian-Qiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Jin-Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Meng-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ou, Jing</au><au>Li, Rui</au><au>Zeng, Rui</au><au>Wu, Chang-Qiang</au><au>Chen, Yong</au><au>Chen, Tian-Wu</au><au>Zhang, Xiao-Ming</au><au>Wu, Lan</au><au>Jiang, Yu</au><au>Yang, Jian-Qiong</au><au>Cao, Jin-Ming</au><au>Tang, Sun</au><au>Tang, Meng-Jie</au><au>Hu, Jiani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CT radiomic features for predicting resectability of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma as given by feature analysis: a case control study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Imaging</addtitle><date>2019-10-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>66</spage><epage>66</epage><pages>66-66</pages><artnum>66</artnum><issn>1470-7330</issn><issn>1740-5025</issn><eissn>1470-7330</eissn><abstract>Computed tomography (CT) is commonly used in all stages of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) management. Compared to basic CT features, CT radiomic features can objectively obtain more information about intratumour heterogeneity. Although CT radiomics has been proved useful for predicting treatment response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer, the best way to use CT radiomic biomarkers as predictive markers for determining resectability of oesophageal SCC remains to be developed. This study aimed to develop CT radiomic features related to resectability of oesophageal SCC with five predictive models and to determine the most predictive model.
Five hundred ninety-one patients with oesophageal SCC undergoing contrast-enhanced CT were enrolled in this study, and were composed by 270 resectable cases and 321 unresectable cases. Of the 270 resectable oesophageal SCCs, 91 cases were primary resectable tumours; and the remained 179 cases received neoadjuvant therapy after CT, shrank on therapy, and changed to resectable tumours. Four hundred thirteen oesophageal SCCs including 189 resectable cancers and 224 unresectable cancers were randomly allocated to the training cohort; and 178 oesophageal SCCs including 81 resectable tumours and 97 unresectable tumours were allocated to the validation group. Four hundred ninety-five radiomic features were extracted from CT data for identifying resectability of oesophageal SCC. Useful radiomic features were generated by dimension reduction using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The optimal radiomic features were chosen using multivariable logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, X-Gradient boost and decision tree classifiers. Discriminating performance was assessed with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy and F-1score.
Eight radiomic features were selected to create radiomic models related to resectability of oesophageal SCC (P-values < 0.01 for both cohorts). Multivariable logistic regression model showed the best performance (AUC = 0.92 ± 0.04 and 0.87 ± 0.02, accuracy = 0.87 and 0.86, and F-1score = 0.93 and 0.86 in training and validation cohorts, respectively) in comparison with any other model (P-value < 0.001). Good calibration was observed for multivariable logistic regression model.
CT radiomic models could help predict resectability of oesophageal SCC, and multivariable logistic regression model is the most predictive model.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>31619297</pmid><doi>10.1186/s40644-019-0254-0</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5776-3429</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-7330 |
ispartof | Cancer imaging, 2019-10, Vol.19 (1), p.66-66, Article 66 |
issn | 1470-7330 1740-5025 1470-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_eae9362064b345808aa82cfde8160cd2 |
source | PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Accuracy Age Analysis Biological markers Biomarkers Biopsy Cancer Cancer therapies Cancer treatment Carcinoma Case-Control Studies CAT scans Chemotherapy Computed tomography Decision making Decision trees Diagnosis Diagnostic imaging Esophageal cancer Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Esophageal Neoplasms - surgery Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - diagnostic imaging Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma - surgery Esophagectomy Esophagectomy - methods Esophagus Feature extraction Female Humans Lymphatic system Male Medical imaging Medical records Metastasis Middle Aged Neoadjuvant therapy Patients Radiation therapy Radiomics Regression analysis Regression models Squamous cell carcinoma Support vector machines Surgery Surgical outcomes Therapy Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Training Tumors |
title | CT radiomic features for predicting resectability of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma as given by feature analysis: a case control study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CT%20radiomic%20features%20for%20predicting%20resectability%20of%20oesophageal%20squamous%20cell%20carcinoma%20as%20given%20by%20feature%20analysis:%20a%20case%20control%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20imaging&rft.au=Ou,%20Jing&rft.date=2019-10-16&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=66&rft.epage=66&rft.pages=66-66&rft.artnum=66&rft.issn=1470-7330&rft.eissn=1470-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s40644-019-0254-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA603308908%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c591t-6ef5b7546c0424a53585dd11f6196202bb98357c452cc70c9b3be3a3677e39733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2306839216&rft_id=info:pmid/31619297&rft_galeid=A603308908&rfr_iscdi=true |