Loading…

The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty

Background The L test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The L test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online) 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.1-6, Article 17
Main Authors: Özden, Fatih, Coşkun, Gökhan, Bakırhan, Serkan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83
container_end_page 6
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)
container_volume 26
creator Özden, Fatih
Coşkun, Gökhan
Bakırhan, Serkan
description Background The L test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The L test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The L test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the L test. Results The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the L test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM 95 and MDC 95 values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the L test ( r 1 = 0.889, r 2 = −0.568, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and L test ( r = 0.024, p > 0.05). Conclusions The L test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC 95 of the L test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ebd8222f9aec4474a724f4d631ca603a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ebd8222f9aec4474a724f4d631ca603a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2730330855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhgtRsBnnBVwF15bmVklqI8jgZaDBzbgOp3LpSlNdKZP0SD-A7226ahBm4yIcOPn_Lznnb5q3BH8gRImPmTMiSItpPRgz1aoXzY52TLS9EPhlsyOE4FYIQl43tzkfq4gq3nMsd82fh9Gh4nJpk7sWlNwUYAhTKJf3yMTZnFNyc0GPMAW7NmG26BTmcIIJ2WoyBYbJITPCfHAoelQqcr9CUZjRAiVUQEa_QxlRiaXaxrAgSGVMcZkgl8ub5pWHKbvbp3rT_Pz65eHue7v_8e3-7vO-NYwL1VIpgShLOuWpcNz7TsqBqZ5hS6Wnxio_yEEM0nEChFnoBQVJaTdgyphX7Ka537g2wlEvqc6QLjpC0GsjpoOu3wpmctoNVlFKfQ_OcC555XDPrWDEgMAMKuvTxlrOw8lZU2dMMD2DPr-Zw6gP8VErpnjXdRXw7gmQ4q9z3ZZObompZE0lw4xhtYroJjIp5pyc__cAwfqavt7S1zV9vaavr2OyzZSruIaS9DGe01w3-z_XX0PztLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730330855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Özden, Fatih ; Coşkun, Gökhan ; Bakırhan, Serkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Özden, Fatih ; Coşkun, Gökhan ; Bakırhan, Serkan</creatorcontrib><description>Background The L test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The L test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The L test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the L test. Results The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the L test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM 95 and MDC 95 values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the L test ( r 1 = 0.889, r 2 = −0.568, p &lt; 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and L test ( r = 0.024, p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions The L test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC 95 of the L test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1110-6611</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2536-9660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Gait ; Home environment ; Joint replacement surgery ; L test ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original ; Original Research Article ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis ; Patients ; Reliability ; Total hip arthroplasty ; Validity ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online), 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.1-6, Article 17</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6593-3758 ; 0000-0002-6586-2088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2730330855?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,25757,27924,27925,37014,38516,43895,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özden, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coşkun, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakırhan, Serkan</creatorcontrib><title>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</title><title>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)</title><addtitle>Bull Fac Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Background The L test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The L test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The L test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the L test. Results The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the L test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM 95 and MDC 95 values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the L test ( r 1 = 0.889, r 2 = −0.568, p &lt; 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and L test ( r = 0.024, p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions The L test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC 95 of the L test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Home environment</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>L test</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1110-6611</issn><issn>2536-9660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhgtRsBnnBVwF15bmVklqI8jgZaDBzbgOp3LpSlNdKZP0SD-A7226ahBm4yIcOPn_Lznnb5q3BH8gRImPmTMiSItpPRgz1aoXzY52TLS9EPhlsyOE4FYIQl43tzkfq4gq3nMsd82fh9Gh4nJpk7sWlNwUYAhTKJf3yMTZnFNyc0GPMAW7NmG26BTmcIIJ2WoyBYbJITPCfHAoelQqcr9CUZjRAiVUQEa_QxlRiaXaxrAgSGVMcZkgl8ub5pWHKbvbp3rT_Pz65eHue7v_8e3-7vO-NYwL1VIpgShLOuWpcNz7TsqBqZ5hS6Wnxio_yEEM0nEChFnoBQVJaTdgyphX7Ka537g2wlEvqc6QLjpC0GsjpoOu3wpmctoNVlFKfQ_OcC555XDPrWDEgMAMKuvTxlrOw8lZU2dMMD2DPr-Zw6gP8VErpnjXdRXw7gmQ4q9z3ZZObompZE0lw4xhtYroJjIp5pyc__cAwfqavt7S1zV9vaavr2OyzZSruIaS9DGe01w3-z_XX0PztLs</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Özden, Fatih</creator><creator>Coşkun, Gökhan</creator><creator>Bakırhan, Serkan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-3758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-2088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Özden, Fatih ; Coşkun, Gökhan ; Bakırhan, Serkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Home environment</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>L test</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özden, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coşkun, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakırhan, Serkan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özden, Fatih</au><au>Coşkun, Gökhan</au><au>Bakırhan, Serkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)</jtitle><stitle>Bull Fac Phys Ther</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><artnum>17</artnum><issn>1110-6611</issn><eissn>2536-9660</eissn><abstract>Background The L test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The L test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The L test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the L test. Results The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the L test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM 95 and MDC 95 values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the L test ( r 1 = 0.889, r 2 = −0.568, p &lt; 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and L test ( r = 0.024, p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions The L test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC 95 of the L test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-3758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-2088</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1110-6611
ispartof Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online), 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.1-6, Article 17
issn 1110-6611
2536-9660
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ebd8222f9aec4474a724f4d631ca603a
source Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Arthritis
Gait
Home environment
Joint replacement surgery
L test
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original
Original Research Article
Orthopedics
Osteoarthritis
Patients
Reliability
Total hip arthroplasty
Validity
Walking
title The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A30%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20test-retest%20reliability,%20concurrent%20validity,%20and%20minimal%20detectable%20change%20of%20the%20L%20test%20in%20patients%20with%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20Faculty%20of%20Physical%20Therapy%20(Online)&rft.au=%C3%96zden,%20Fatih&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.artnum=17&rft.issn=1110-6611&rft.eissn=2536-9660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2730330855%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730330855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true