Loading…
The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty
Background The L test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The L test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and m...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online) 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.1-6, Article 17 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83 |
container_end_page | 6 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online) |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Özden, Fatih Coşkun, Gökhan Bakırhan, Serkan |
description | Background
The
L
test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The
L
test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the
L
test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The
L
test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the
L
test.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the
L
test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM
95
and MDC
95
values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the
L
test (
r
1
= 0.889,
r
2
= −0.568,
p
< 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and
L
test (
r
= 0.024,
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The
L
test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC
95
of the
L
test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ebd8222f9aec4474a724f4d631ca603a</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ebd8222f9aec4474a724f4d631ca603a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2730330855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhgtRsBnnBVwF15bmVklqI8jgZaDBzbgOp3LpSlNdKZP0SD-A7226ahBm4yIcOPn_Lznnb5q3BH8gRImPmTMiSItpPRgz1aoXzY52TLS9EPhlsyOE4FYIQl43tzkfq4gq3nMsd82fh9Gh4nJpk7sWlNwUYAhTKJf3yMTZnFNyc0GPMAW7NmG26BTmcIIJ2WoyBYbJITPCfHAoelQqcr9CUZjRAiVUQEa_QxlRiaXaxrAgSGVMcZkgl8ub5pWHKbvbp3rT_Pz65eHue7v_8e3-7vO-NYwL1VIpgShLOuWpcNz7TsqBqZ5hS6Wnxio_yEEM0nEChFnoBQVJaTdgyphX7Ka537g2wlEvqc6QLjpC0GsjpoOu3wpmctoNVlFKfQ_OcC555XDPrWDEgMAMKuvTxlrOw8lZU2dMMD2DPr-Zw6gP8VErpnjXdRXw7gmQ4q9z3ZZObompZE0lw4xhtYroJjIp5pyc__cAwfqavt7S1zV9vaavr2OyzZSruIaS9DGe01w3-z_XX0PztLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730330855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access </source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Özden, Fatih ; Coşkun, Gökhan ; Bakırhan, Serkan</creator><creatorcontrib>Özden, Fatih ; Coşkun, Gökhan ; Bakırhan, Serkan</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The
L
test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The
L
test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the
L
test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The
L
test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the
L
test.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the
L
test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM
95
and MDC
95
values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the
L
test (
r
1
= 0.889,
r
2
= −0.568,
p
< 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and
L
test (
r
= 0.024,
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The
L
test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC
95
of the
L
test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1110-6611</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2536-9660</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Gait ; Home environment ; Joint replacement surgery ; L test ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original ; Original Research Article ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis ; Patients ; Reliability ; Total hip arthroplasty ; Validity ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online), 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.1-6, Article 17</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6593-3758 ; 0000-0002-6586-2088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2730330855?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,25757,27924,27925,37014,38516,43895,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Özden, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coşkun, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakırhan, Serkan</creatorcontrib><title>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</title><title>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)</title><addtitle>Bull Fac Phys Ther</addtitle><description>Background
The
L
test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The
L
test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the
L
test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The
L
test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the
L
test.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the
L
test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM
95
and MDC
95
values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the
L
test (
r
1
= 0.889,
r
2
= −0.568,
p
< 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and
L
test (
r
= 0.024,
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The
L
test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC
95
of the
L
test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Home environment</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>L test</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>1110-6611</issn><issn>2536-9660</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFDEUhgtRsBnnBVwF15bmVklqI8jgZaDBzbgOp3LpSlNdKZP0SD-A7226ahBm4yIcOPn_Lznnb5q3BH8gRImPmTMiSItpPRgz1aoXzY52TLS9EPhlsyOE4FYIQl43tzkfq4gq3nMsd82fh9Gh4nJpk7sWlNwUYAhTKJf3yMTZnFNyc0GPMAW7NmG26BTmcIIJ2WoyBYbJITPCfHAoelQqcr9CUZjRAiVUQEa_QxlRiaXaxrAgSGVMcZkgl8ub5pWHKbvbp3rT_Pz65eHue7v_8e3-7vO-NYwL1VIpgShLOuWpcNz7TsqBqZ5hS6Wnxio_yEEM0nEChFnoBQVJaTdgyphX7Ka537g2wlEvqc6QLjpC0GsjpoOu3wpmctoNVlFKfQ_OcC555XDPrWDEgMAMKuvTxlrOw8lZU2dMMD2DPr-Zw6gP8VErpnjXdRXw7gmQ4q9z3ZZObompZE0lw4xhtYroJjIp5pyc__cAwfqavt7S1zV9vaavr2OyzZSruIaS9DGe01w3-z_XX0PztLs</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Özden, Fatih</creator><creator>Coşkun, Gökhan</creator><creator>Bakırhan, Serkan</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-3758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-2088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Özden, Fatih ; Coşkun, Gökhan ; Bakırhan, Serkan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Home environment</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>L test</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Özden, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coşkun, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakırhan, Serkan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Özden, Fatih</au><au>Coşkun, Gökhan</au><au>Bakırhan, Serkan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online)</jtitle><stitle>Bull Fac Phys Ther</stitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><artnum>17</artnum><issn>1110-6611</issn><eissn>2536-9660</eissn><abstract>Background
The
L
test is a modified version of the timed up and go test (TUG) with an L-shaped walking path. The
L
test is more extensive than other performance tests, especially in turn direction and specific tasks. The study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the
L
test in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). A cross-sectional study was conducted with 33 unilateral and primary THA patients. The
L
test was performed twice with an interval of an hour on the same day for the test-retest reliability. Timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit to stand test (FTST), and Harris hip score (HHS) were carried out for the analysis of the concurrent validity of the
L
test.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 74.6 ± 10.3 years. The ICC score of the
L
test was 0.992. Test-retest reliability was excellent. SEM
95
and MDC
95
values were 3.39 and 9.39, respectively. Both TUG and HHS were strongly correlated with the
L
test (
r
1
= 0.889,
r
2
= −0.568,
p
< 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between FTST and
L
test (
r
= 0.024,
p
> 0.05).
Conclusions
The
L
test is valid and reliable performance measurement in patients with primary unilateral THA. MDC
95
of the
L
test is an essential reference for clinicians in the rehabilitation follow-up process of THA patients.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-3758</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6586-2088</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1110-6611 |
ispartof | Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy (Online), 2021-12, Vol.26 (1), p.1-6, Article 17 |
issn | 1110-6611 2536-9660 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ebd8222f9aec4474a724f4d631ca603a |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Springer Nature - SpringerLink Journals - Fully Open Access ; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Arthritis Gait Home environment Joint replacement surgery L test Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Original Research Article Orthopedics Osteoarthritis Patients Reliability Total hip arthroplasty Validity Walking |
title | The test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, and minimal detectable change of the L test in patients with total hip arthroplasty |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A30%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20test-retest%20reliability,%20concurrent%20validity,%20and%20minimal%20detectable%20change%20of%20the%20L%20test%20in%20patients%20with%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20Faculty%20of%20Physical%20Therapy%20(Online)&rft.au=%C3%96zden,%20Fatih&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.artnum=17&rft.issn=1110-6611&rft.eissn=2536-9660&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43161-021-00038-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2730330855%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3468-277a18d158f26e4ff577b38930d27f2cd8fb7b6b7e41a13da962a7225b0233f83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730330855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |