A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]

In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 20...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:F1000 research 2017, Vol.6, p.1708
Main Authors: McDonald, Laura, Schultze, Anna, Simpson, Alex, Graham, Sophie, Wasiak, Radek, Ramagopalan, Sreeram V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical trials
Copyright
Cross-sectional studies
Data Sharing
Information sharing
Observational studies
Publishing & Peer Review
Research Note
Reviews
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 1708
container_title F1000 research
container_volume 6
creator McDonald, Laura
Schultze, Anna
Simpson, Alex
Graham, Sophie
Wasiak, Radek
Ramagopalan, Sreeram V
description In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.
doi_str_mv 10.12688/f1000research.12673.2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ebfbb29bbbd34f7cb778e572954fbdad</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ebfbb29bbbd34f7cb778e572954fbdad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1970613501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt2KFDEQhRtR3GXdV5CA173mpzvpjCCMy6orK97olUioJJXpHnomY9I9Mk_hK9vzg-7ceJVQ9Z1TcDhF8ZLRG8Zl07wOjFKaMCMk1-5nStzwJ8Ulp5UsWUX500f_i-I65-UkoFoLydXz4oJrJpUS9WXxe04Sbjv8RWIgHgYguYXUrRckDzDgCtdDJt2aRJsxbWHo4hr6aTf6DjPZjLbvcot-jwwtknefP83InLgUcy4zukf8jnzfYsrTgPA3ZIOYTpdnhBPYbFLcov_xongWoM94fXqvim_v777efiwfvny4v50_lK5iDS9F1TgpAIMFpUIArAPy4FnQyuvAnHLCeVCi0g04bdFXopai4YwHJiuF4qq4P_r6CEuzSd0K0s5E6MxhENPCQBo616NBG6zl2lrrRRWUs0o1WCuu6ypYD37yenv0muJYoXdTZgn6M9PzzbprzSJuTS2VZJpOBq9OBin-HDEPZhnHNAWXDdOKSiZqyiZKHqlDugnD3wuMmkMvzFkvzKEXhk_C2VEYwI39sNtD5h_1f_EfMhvC1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970613501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central(OpenAccess)</source><creator>McDonald, Laura ; Schultze, Anna ; Simpson, Alex ; Graham, Sophie ; Wasiak, Radek ; Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</creator><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Laura ; Schultze, Anna ; Simpson, Alex ; Graham, Sophie ; Wasiak, Radek ; Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</creatorcontrib><description>In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-1402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.12673.2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29167735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Faculty of 1000 Ltd</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Copyright ; Cross-sectional studies ; Data Sharing ; Information sharing ; Observational studies ; Publishing &amp; Peer Review ; Research Note ; Reviews ; Studies</subject><ispartof>F1000 research, 2017, Vol.6, p.1708</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2017 McDonald L et al.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 McDonald L et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ ) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2017 McDonald L et al. 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4766-5160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1970613501/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1970613501?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultze, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasiak, Radek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</creatorcontrib><title>A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]</title><title>F1000 research</title><description>In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Data Sharing</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Publishing &amp; Peer Review</subject><subject>Research Note</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>2046-1402</issn><issn>2046-1402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt2KFDEQhRtR3GXdV5CA173mpzvpjCCMy6orK97olUioJJXpHnomY9I9Mk_hK9vzg-7ceJVQ9Z1TcDhF8ZLRG8Zl07wOjFKaMCMk1-5nStzwJ8Ulp5UsWUX500f_i-I65-UkoFoLydXz4oJrJpUS9WXxe04Sbjv8RWIgHgYguYXUrRckDzDgCtdDJt2aRJsxbWHo4hr6aTf6DjPZjLbvcot-jwwtknefP83InLgUcy4zukf8jnzfYsrTgPA3ZIOYTpdnhBPYbFLcov_xongWoM94fXqvim_v777efiwfvny4v50_lK5iDS9F1TgpAIMFpUIArAPy4FnQyuvAnHLCeVCi0g04bdFXopai4YwHJiuF4qq4P_r6CEuzSd0K0s5E6MxhENPCQBo616NBG6zl2lrrRRWUs0o1WCuu6ypYD37yenv0muJYoXdTZgn6M9PzzbprzSJuTS2VZJpOBq9OBin-HDEPZhnHNAWXDdOKSiZqyiZKHqlDugnD3wuMmkMvzFkvzKEXhk_C2VEYwI39sNtD5h_1f_EfMhvC1w</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>McDonald, Laura</creator><creator>Schultze, Anna</creator><creator>Simpson, Alex</creator><creator>Graham, Sophie</creator><creator>Wasiak, Radek</creator><creator>Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</creator><general>Faculty of 1000 Ltd</general><general>F1000 Research Limited</general><general>F1000 Research Ltd</general><scope>C-E</scope><scope>CH4</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-5160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]</title><author>McDonald, Laura ; Schultze, Anna ; Simpson, Alex ; Graham, Sophie ; Wasiak, Radek ; Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Data Sharing</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Publishing &amp; Peer Review</topic><topic>Research Note</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultze, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wasiak, Radek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</creatorcontrib><collection>F1000Research</collection><collection>Faculty of 1000</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDonald, Laura</au><au>Schultze, Anna</au><au>Simpson, Alex</au><au>Graham, Sophie</au><au>Wasiak, Radek</au><au>Ramagopalan, Sreeram V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]</atitle><jtitle>F1000 research</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>6</volume><spage>1708</spage><pages>1708-</pages><issn>2046-1402</issn><eissn>2046-1402</eissn><abstract>In order to understand the current state of data sharing in observational research studies, we reviewed data sharing statements of observational studies published in a general medical journal, the British Medical Journal. We found that the majority (63%) of observational studies published between 2015 and 2017 included a statement that implied that data used in the study could not be shared. If the findings of our exploratory study are confirmed, room for improvement in the sharing of real-world or observational research data exists.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Faculty of 1000 Ltd</pub><pmid>29167735</pmid><doi>10.12688/f1000research.12673.2</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4766-5160</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-1402
ispartof F1000 research, 2017, Vol.6, p.1708
issn 2046-1402
2046-1402
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ebfbb29bbbd34f7cb778e572954fbdad
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central(OpenAccess)
subjects Clinical trials
Copyright
Cross-sectional studies
Data Sharing
Information sharing
Observational studies
Publishing & Peer Review
Research Note
Reviews
Studies
title A review of data sharing statements in observational studies published in the BMJ: A cross-sectional study [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A10%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20data%20sharing%20statements%20in%20observational%20studies%20published%20in%20the%20BMJ:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study%20%5Bversion%202;%20peer%20review:%202%20approved%5D&rft.jtitle=F1000%20research&rft.au=McDonald,%20Laura&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=6&rft.spage=1708&rft.pages=1708-&rft.issn=2046-1402&rft.eissn=2046-1402&rft_id=info:doi/10.12688/f1000research.12673.2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1970613501%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4182-348c63aefba77ffae5fe2fd1f97d9f1c7c3cda73498ac9bed435638212f1647e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970613501&rft_id=info:pmid/29167735&rfr_iscdi=true