Loading…
A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines
This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on h...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of preventive medicine 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.151-151 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-213150c7494ec9f97c373f8585b96c00242186bd5be3081e77d55d9b691aa6553 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 151 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 151 |
container_title | International journal of preventive medicine |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi Askarpour, Hasan Arjmand, Mehrdad Babakhanian, Masoudeh Amiri, Masoud Mazaheri, Elaheh |
description | This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on humans, of which eight vaccines reached phase four clinical trials in humans and approved by FDA and EUA. After the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had the highest efficacy (95%), the efficacy of the other vaccines are as follows: Moderna 94.5%, Sputnik V 91%, Novavax 89.7%, Sinopharm 79.3%, Oxford/AstraZenaca 70.4%, Johnson and Johnson 66.9%, and Sinovac 50.7%. At present, protein-based vaccines, with 35% of all available COVID-19 vaccines, are the most common technique in the vaccine production, and then there are vaccines of non-replicating viral vector (13.3%), mRNA1 (12.1%), DNA (10.2%), replicating viral vector (9.8%), and inactivated vaccines (8.2%). The most frequently recognized adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose involved fever, fatigue, headache, chill, and myalgia. The mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher occurrence of local side effects (78.3 vs. 70.4%; Sig. = 0.064), whereas the viral vector-based vaccine was associated with a higher prevalence of systemic side effects (87.2 vs. 61%; Sig. < 0.001). Based on the evidence and articles in the field of vaccination, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinopharm vaccines reported the highest and lowest side effects, respectively. Because of being emerging, pathogenicity, and high infectivity of COVID-19, vaccination against the disease to prevent its incident rate and decrease the prevalence rate is recommended immediately. Being informed of various aspects of the existing vaccines such as efficacy, effectiveness, safety, etc.can accelerate to make effective and useful choices and consequently have a vaccinated community against the epidemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_513_21 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ec4b3d085d2f4514ac4a18981616f2ad</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ec4b3d085d2f4514ac4a18981616f2ad</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2786513034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-213150c7494ec9f97c373f8585b96c00242186bd5be3081e77d55d9b691aa6553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUha2qVUGUP9BFlSVdhPode1NpFFo6AgmJx2wtx7kBj5I4tTNT9d9jmAHBXdhX9rmfj3wQ-krwKSeY_fDraTucPq9GEGYo-YAOKcaqVJSwj_u-UpgeoOOU1jgX01JS8RkdMKkJwVgcootFUYdhivAAY_JbKK5h6-FfEcZiZaMPm1Qs0gRuTkXoipvF9U1Zh1VJi5P6arU8K4n-noXO-RHSF_Sps32C4_1-hO5-_7qt_5SXV-fLenFZOi7VXGZ7RGBXcc3B6U5XjlWsU0KJRkuHMeWUKNm0ogGGFYGqaoVodZM9WyuFYEdoueO2wa7NFP1g438TrDfPByHeGxtn73ow4HjDWqxESzsuCLeOW6K0IpLIjto2s37uWNOmGaB1MM7R9u-g729G_2Duw9boXFjzDDjZA2L4u4E0m8EnB31vR8i_Z2ilZM4Hsycp3UldDClF6F6fIdg8hWp2cb4NNQ99e2vwdeQlQvYIT2udjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2786513034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi ; Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi ; Askarpour, Hasan ; Arjmand, Mehrdad ; Babakhanian, Masoudeh ; Amiri, Masoud ; Mazaheri, Elaheh</creator><creatorcontrib>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi ; Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi ; Askarpour, Hasan ; Arjmand, Mehrdad ; Babakhanian, Masoudeh ; Amiri, Masoud ; Mazaheri, Elaheh</creatorcontrib><description>This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on humans, of which eight vaccines reached phase four clinical trials in humans and approved by FDA and EUA. After the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had the highest efficacy (95%), the efficacy of the other vaccines are as follows: Moderna 94.5%, Sputnik V 91%, Novavax 89.7%, Sinopharm 79.3%, Oxford/AstraZenaca 70.4%, Johnson and Johnson 66.9%, and Sinovac 50.7%. At present, protein-based vaccines, with 35% of all available COVID-19 vaccines, are the most common technique in the vaccine production, and then there are vaccines of non-replicating viral vector (13.3%), mRNA1 (12.1%), DNA (10.2%), replicating viral vector (9.8%), and inactivated vaccines (8.2%). The most frequently recognized adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose involved fever, fatigue, headache, chill, and myalgia. The mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher occurrence of local side effects (78.3 vs. 70.4%; Sig. = 0.064), whereas the viral vector-based vaccine was associated with a higher prevalence of systemic side effects (87.2 vs. 61%; Sig. < 0.001). Based on the evidence and articles in the field of vaccination, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinopharm vaccines reported the highest and lowest side effects, respectively. Because of being emerging, pathogenicity, and high infectivity of COVID-19, vaccination against the disease to prevent its incident rate and decrease the prevalence rate is recommended immediately. Being informed of various aspects of the existing vaccines such as efficacy, effectiveness, safety, etc.can accelerate to make effective and useful choices and consequently have a vaccinated community against the epidemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2008-7802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2008-8213</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_513_21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36911005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Iran: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</publisher><subject>comprehensive review ; covid-19 ; efficacy ; Review ; safety ; vaccination ; vaccines</subject><ispartof>International journal of preventive medicine, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.151-151</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2022 International Journal of Preventive Medicine.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2022 International Journal of Preventive Medicine 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-213150c7494ec9f97c373f8585b96c00242186bd5be3081e77d55d9b691aa6553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999094/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9999094/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,37012,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36911005$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askarpour, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arjmand, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babakhanian, Masoudeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amiri, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazaheri, Elaheh</creatorcontrib><title>A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines</title><title>International journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Prev Med</addtitle><description>This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on humans, of which eight vaccines reached phase four clinical trials in humans and approved by FDA and EUA. After the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had the highest efficacy (95%), the efficacy of the other vaccines are as follows: Moderna 94.5%, Sputnik V 91%, Novavax 89.7%, Sinopharm 79.3%, Oxford/AstraZenaca 70.4%, Johnson and Johnson 66.9%, and Sinovac 50.7%. At present, protein-based vaccines, with 35% of all available COVID-19 vaccines, are the most common technique in the vaccine production, and then there are vaccines of non-replicating viral vector (13.3%), mRNA1 (12.1%), DNA (10.2%), replicating viral vector (9.8%), and inactivated vaccines (8.2%). The most frequently recognized adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose involved fever, fatigue, headache, chill, and myalgia. The mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher occurrence of local side effects (78.3 vs. 70.4%; Sig. = 0.064), whereas the viral vector-based vaccine was associated with a higher prevalence of systemic side effects (87.2 vs. 61%; Sig. < 0.001). Based on the evidence and articles in the field of vaccination, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinopharm vaccines reported the highest and lowest side effects, respectively. Because of being emerging, pathogenicity, and high infectivity of COVID-19, vaccination against the disease to prevent its incident rate and decrease the prevalence rate is recommended immediately. Being informed of various aspects of the existing vaccines such as efficacy, effectiveness, safety, etc.can accelerate to make effective and useful choices and consequently have a vaccinated community against the epidemic.</description><subject>comprehensive review</subject><subject>covid-19</subject><subject>efficacy</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>vaccination</subject><subject>vaccines</subject><issn>2008-7802</issn><issn>2008-8213</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUha2qVUGUP9BFlSVdhPode1NpFFo6AgmJx2wtx7kBj5I4tTNT9d9jmAHBXdhX9rmfj3wQ-krwKSeY_fDraTucPq9GEGYo-YAOKcaqVJSwj_u-UpgeoOOU1jgX01JS8RkdMKkJwVgcootFUYdhivAAY_JbKK5h6-FfEcZiZaMPm1Qs0gRuTkXoipvF9U1Zh1VJi5P6arU8K4n-noXO-RHSF_Sps32C4_1-hO5-_7qt_5SXV-fLenFZOi7VXGZ7RGBXcc3B6U5XjlWsU0KJRkuHMeWUKNm0ogGGFYGqaoVodZM9WyuFYEdoueO2wa7NFP1g438TrDfPByHeGxtn73ow4HjDWqxESzsuCLeOW6K0IpLIjto2s37uWNOmGaB1MM7R9u-g729G_2Duw9boXFjzDDjZA2L4u4E0m8EnB31vR8i_Z2ilZM4Hsycp3UldDClF6F6fIdg8hWp2cb4NNQ99e2vwdeQlQvYIT2udjA</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi</creator><creator>Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi</creator><creator>Askarpour, Hasan</creator><creator>Arjmand, Mehrdad</creator><creator>Babakhanian, Masoudeh</creator><creator>Amiri, Masoud</creator><creator>Mazaheri, Elaheh</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines</title><author>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi ; Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi ; Askarpour, Hasan ; Arjmand, Mehrdad ; Babakhanian, Masoudeh ; Amiri, Masoud ; Mazaheri, Elaheh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-213150c7494ec9f97c373f8585b96c00242186bd5be3081e77d55d9b691aa6553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>comprehensive review</topic><topic>covid-19</topic><topic>efficacy</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>vaccination</topic><topic>vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Askarpour, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arjmand, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babakhanian, Masoudeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amiri, Masoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazaheri, Elaheh</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pordanjani, Sajjad Rahimi</au><au>Pordanjani, Ali Rahimi</au><au>Askarpour, Hasan</au><au>Arjmand, Mehrdad</au><au>Babakhanian, Masoudeh</au><au>Amiri, Masoud</au><au>Mazaheri, Elaheh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines</atitle><jtitle>International journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>151-151</pages><issn>2008-7802</issn><eissn>2008-8213</eissn><abstract>This is a comprehensive review based on the published papers in the field of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccination. Many efforts have been made to develop vaccines to combat this pandemic. Since December 2020, more than 200 vaccines have been tested in various research stages and in clinical trials on humans, of which eight vaccines reached phase four clinical trials in humans and approved by FDA and EUA. After the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine that had the highest efficacy (95%), the efficacy of the other vaccines are as follows: Moderna 94.5%, Sputnik V 91%, Novavax 89.7%, Sinopharm 79.3%, Oxford/AstraZenaca 70.4%, Johnson and Johnson 66.9%, and Sinovac 50.7%. At present, protein-based vaccines, with 35% of all available COVID-19 vaccines, are the most common technique in the vaccine production, and then there are vaccines of non-replicating viral vector (13.3%), mRNA1 (12.1%), DNA (10.2%), replicating viral vector (9.8%), and inactivated vaccines (8.2%). The most frequently recognized adverse effects within 7 days of each vaccine dose involved fever, fatigue, headache, chill, and myalgia. The mRNA-based vaccines were associated with a higher occurrence of local side effects (78.3 vs. 70.4%; Sig. = 0.064), whereas the viral vector-based vaccine was associated with a higher prevalence of systemic side effects (87.2 vs. 61%; Sig. < 0.001). Based on the evidence and articles in the field of vaccination, AstraZeneca-Oxford and Sinopharm vaccines reported the highest and lowest side effects, respectively. Because of being emerging, pathogenicity, and high infectivity of COVID-19, vaccination against the disease to prevent its incident rate and decrease the prevalence rate is recommended immediately. Being informed of various aspects of the existing vaccines such as efficacy, effectiveness, safety, etc.can accelerate to make effective and useful choices and consequently have a vaccinated community against the epidemic.</abstract><cop>Iran</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</pub><pmid>36911005</pmid><doi>10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_513_21</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2008-7802 |
ispartof | International journal of preventive medicine, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.151-151 |
issn | 2008-7802 2008-8213 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ec4b3d085d2f4514ac4a18981616f2ad |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | comprehensive review covid-19 efficacy Review safety vaccination vaccines |
title | A Comprehensive Review on Various Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Vaccines |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A35%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comprehensive%20Review%20on%20Various%20Aspects%20of%20SARS-CoV-2%20(COVID-19)%20Vaccines&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Pordanjani,%20Sajjad%20Rahimi&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=151-151&rft.issn=2008-7802&rft.eissn=2008-8213&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_513_21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2786513034%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-213150c7494ec9f97c373f8585b96c00242186bd5be3081e77d55d9b691aa6553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2786513034&rft_id=info:pmid/36911005&rfr_iscdi=true |