Loading…
Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited
Parenclitic networks provide a powerful and relatively new way to coerce multidimensional data into a graph form, enabling the application of graph theory to evaluate features. Different algorithms have been published for constructing parenclitic networks, leading to the question-which algorithm sho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in genetics 2021-10, Vol.12, p.733783-733783 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fe72ce677cc6603970503b0be0b27bcb2402a57fa755b11d975d78c9090cfae23 |
container_end_page | 733783 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 733783 |
container_title | Frontiers in genetics |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Nazarenko, Tatiana Whitwell, Harry J Blyuss, Oleg Zaikin, Alexey |
description | Parenclitic networks provide a powerful and relatively new way to coerce multidimensional data into a graph form, enabling the application of graph theory to evaluate features. Different algorithms have been published for constructing parenclitic networks, leading to the question-which algorithm should be chosen? Initially, it was suggested to calculate the weight of an edge between two nodes of the network as a deviation from a linear regression, calculated for a dependence of one of these features on the other. This method works well, but not when features do not have a linear relationship. To overcome this, it was suggested to calculate edge weights as the distance from the area of most probable values by using a kernel density estimation. In these two approaches only one class (typically controls or healthy population) is used to construct a model. To take account of a second class, we have introduced synolytic networks, using a boundary between two classes on the feature-feature plane to estimate the weight of the edge between these features. Common to all these approaches is that topological indices can be used to evaluate the structure represented by the graphs. To compare these network approaches alongside more traditional machine-learning algorithms, we performed a substantial analysis using both synthetic data with
known structure and publicly available datasets used for the benchmarking of ML-algorithms. Such a comparison has shown that the main advantage of parenclitic and synolytic networks is their resistance to over-fitting (occurring when the number of features is greater than the number of subjects) compared to other ML approaches. Secondly, the capability to visualise data in a structured form, even when this structure is not
available allows for visual inspection and the application of well-established graph theory to their interpretation/application, eliminating the "black-box" nature of other ML approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fgene.2021.733783 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ec9d7cbb8a034b1d9972ecfdb59090a5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ec9d7cbb8a034b1d9972ecfdb59090a5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2595103216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fe72ce677cc6603970503b0be0b27bcb2402a57fa755b11d975d78c9090cfae23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkclOwzAQQC0EoqjwAVxQjxxI8RrHFyRUsUkIEMvZsp1JMaRxsdOi_j0JBVR8GXuW55EeQocEjxkr1Gk1hQbGFFMylozJgm2hPZLnPCu61PbGfYAOUnrD3eGKMcZ30YBxyQUldA-dPJgIjat9693INOXoadWEetW_7qD9DPE9jR5h6ZNvodxHO5WpExz8xCF6ubx4nlxnt_dXN5Pz28xxItusAkkd5FI6l-eYKYkFZhZbwJZK6yzlmBohKyOFsISUSopSFk5hhV1lgLIhullzy2De9Dz6mYkrHYzX34kQp9rEbsUaNDhVSmdtYTDjtmMpScFVpRU9zoiOdbZmzRd2BqWDpo2m_gf9X2n8q56GpS5EzjHvAcc_gBg-FpBaPfPJQV2bBsIiaSqUIJhRknetZN3qYkgpQvX3DcG6l6a_peleml5L62aONvf7m_hVxL4AoWmTsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2595103216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nazarenko, Tatiana ; Whitwell, Harry J ; Blyuss, Oleg ; Zaikin, Alexey</creator><creatorcontrib>Nazarenko, Tatiana ; Whitwell, Harry J ; Blyuss, Oleg ; Zaikin, Alexey</creatorcontrib><description>Parenclitic networks provide a powerful and relatively new way to coerce multidimensional data into a graph form, enabling the application of graph theory to evaluate features. Different algorithms have been published for constructing parenclitic networks, leading to the question-which algorithm should be chosen? Initially, it was suggested to calculate the weight of an edge between two nodes of the network as a deviation from a linear regression, calculated for a dependence of one of these features on the other. This method works well, but not when features do not have a linear relationship. To overcome this, it was suggested to calculate edge weights as the distance from the area of most probable values by using a kernel density estimation. In these two approaches only one class (typically controls or healthy population) is used to construct a model. To take account of a second class, we have introduced synolytic networks, using a boundary between two classes on the feature-feature plane to estimate the weight of the edge between these features. Common to all these approaches is that topological indices can be used to evaluate the structure represented by the graphs. To compare these network approaches alongside more traditional machine-learning algorithms, we performed a substantial analysis using both synthetic data with
known structure and publicly available datasets used for the benchmarking of ML-algorithms. Such a comparison has shown that the main advantage of parenclitic and synolytic networks is their resistance to over-fitting (occurring when the number of features is greater than the number of subjects) compared to other ML approaches. Secondly, the capability to visualise data in a structured form, even when this structure is not
available allows for visual inspection and the application of well-established graph theory to their interpretation/application, eliminating the "black-box" nature of other ML approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-8021</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-8021</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.733783</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34745212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>complexity ; Genetics ; graphs ; networks ; parenclitic ; synolytic</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in genetics, 2021-10, Vol.12, p.733783-733783</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Nazarenko, Whitwell, Blyuss and Zaikin.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Nazarenko, Whitwell, Blyuss and Zaikin. 2021 Nazarenko, Whitwell, Blyuss and Zaikin</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fe72ce677cc6603970503b0be0b27bcb2402a57fa755b11d975d78c9090cfae23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564045/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8564045/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34745212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nazarenko, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitwell, Harry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blyuss, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaikin, Alexey</creatorcontrib><title>Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited</title><title>Frontiers in genetics</title><addtitle>Front Genet</addtitle><description>Parenclitic networks provide a powerful and relatively new way to coerce multidimensional data into a graph form, enabling the application of graph theory to evaluate features. Different algorithms have been published for constructing parenclitic networks, leading to the question-which algorithm should be chosen? Initially, it was suggested to calculate the weight of an edge between two nodes of the network as a deviation from a linear regression, calculated for a dependence of one of these features on the other. This method works well, but not when features do not have a linear relationship. To overcome this, it was suggested to calculate edge weights as the distance from the area of most probable values by using a kernel density estimation. In these two approaches only one class (typically controls or healthy population) is used to construct a model. To take account of a second class, we have introduced synolytic networks, using a boundary between two classes on the feature-feature plane to estimate the weight of the edge between these features. Common to all these approaches is that topological indices can be used to evaluate the structure represented by the graphs. To compare these network approaches alongside more traditional machine-learning algorithms, we performed a substantial analysis using both synthetic data with
known structure and publicly available datasets used for the benchmarking of ML-algorithms. Such a comparison has shown that the main advantage of parenclitic and synolytic networks is their resistance to over-fitting (occurring when the number of features is greater than the number of subjects) compared to other ML approaches. Secondly, the capability to visualise data in a structured form, even when this structure is not
available allows for visual inspection and the application of well-established graph theory to their interpretation/application, eliminating the "black-box" nature of other ML approaches.</description><subject>complexity</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>graphs</subject><subject>networks</subject><subject>parenclitic</subject><subject>synolytic</subject><issn>1664-8021</issn><issn>1664-8021</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkclOwzAQQC0EoqjwAVxQjxxI8RrHFyRUsUkIEMvZsp1JMaRxsdOi_j0JBVR8GXuW55EeQocEjxkr1Gk1hQbGFFMylozJgm2hPZLnPCu61PbGfYAOUnrD3eGKMcZ30YBxyQUldA-dPJgIjat9693INOXoadWEetW_7qD9DPE9jR5h6ZNvodxHO5WpExz8xCF6ubx4nlxnt_dXN5Pz28xxItusAkkd5FI6l-eYKYkFZhZbwJZK6yzlmBohKyOFsISUSopSFk5hhV1lgLIhullzy2De9Dz6mYkrHYzX34kQp9rEbsUaNDhVSmdtYTDjtmMpScFVpRU9zoiOdbZmzRd2BqWDpo2m_gf9X2n8q56GpS5EzjHvAcc_gBg-FpBaPfPJQV2bBsIiaSqUIJhRknetZN3qYkgpQvX3DcG6l6a_peleml5L62aONvf7m_hVxL4AoWmTsA</recordid><startdate>20211020</startdate><enddate>20211020</enddate><creator>Nazarenko, Tatiana</creator><creator>Whitwell, Harry J</creator><creator>Blyuss, Oleg</creator><creator>Zaikin, Alexey</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211020</creationdate><title>Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited</title><author>Nazarenko, Tatiana ; Whitwell, Harry J ; Blyuss, Oleg ; Zaikin, Alexey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fe72ce677cc6603970503b0be0b27bcb2402a57fa755b11d975d78c9090cfae23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>complexity</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>graphs</topic><topic>networks</topic><topic>parenclitic</topic><topic>synolytic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nazarenko, Tatiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitwell, Harry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blyuss, Oleg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaikin, Alexey</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nazarenko, Tatiana</au><au>Whitwell, Harry J</au><au>Blyuss, Oleg</au><au>Zaikin, Alexey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Front Genet</addtitle><date>2021-10-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>733783</spage><epage>733783</epage><pages>733783-733783</pages><issn>1664-8021</issn><eissn>1664-8021</eissn><abstract>Parenclitic networks provide a powerful and relatively new way to coerce multidimensional data into a graph form, enabling the application of graph theory to evaluate features. Different algorithms have been published for constructing parenclitic networks, leading to the question-which algorithm should be chosen? Initially, it was suggested to calculate the weight of an edge between two nodes of the network as a deviation from a linear regression, calculated for a dependence of one of these features on the other. This method works well, but not when features do not have a linear relationship. To overcome this, it was suggested to calculate edge weights as the distance from the area of most probable values by using a kernel density estimation. In these two approaches only one class (typically controls or healthy population) is used to construct a model. To take account of a second class, we have introduced synolytic networks, using a boundary between two classes on the feature-feature plane to estimate the weight of the edge between these features. Common to all these approaches is that topological indices can be used to evaluate the structure represented by the graphs. To compare these network approaches alongside more traditional machine-learning algorithms, we performed a substantial analysis using both synthetic data with
known structure and publicly available datasets used for the benchmarking of ML-algorithms. Such a comparison has shown that the main advantage of parenclitic and synolytic networks is their resistance to over-fitting (occurring when the number of features is greater than the number of subjects) compared to other ML approaches. Secondly, the capability to visualise data in a structured form, even when this structure is not
available allows for visual inspection and the application of well-established graph theory to their interpretation/application, eliminating the "black-box" nature of other ML approaches.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>34745212</pmid><doi>10.3389/fgene.2021.733783</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1664-8021 |
ispartof | Frontiers in genetics, 2021-10, Vol.12, p.733783-733783 |
issn | 1664-8021 1664-8021 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ec9d7cbb8a034b1d9972ecfdb59090a5 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | complexity Genetics graphs networks parenclitic synolytic |
title | Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parenclitic%20and%20Synolytic%20Networks%20Revisited&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20genetics&rft.au=Nazarenko,%20Tatiana&rft.date=2021-10-20&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=733783&rft.epage=733783&rft.pages=733783-733783&rft.issn=1664-8021&rft.eissn=1664-8021&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fgene.2021.733783&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2595103216%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-fe72ce677cc6603970503b0be0b27bcb2402a57fa755b11d975d78c9090cfae23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2595103216&rft_id=info:pmid/34745212&rfr_iscdi=true |