Perceptions of shared care among survivors of colorectal cancer from non-English-speaking and English-speaking backgrounds: a qualitative study

• Published in: BMC family practice 2018-07, Vol.19 (1), p.134-134, Article 134
• Main Authors: Tan, Lawrence, Gallego, Gisselle, Nguyen, Thi Thao Cam, Bokey, Les, Reath, Jennifer
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Bilingualism; Cancer treatment; Care and treatment; Care coordination; Colorectal cancer; Communication; Continuity of care; Cultural and linguistic diversity; Family medicine; Family physicians; General practice; Health care policy; Hospitals; Multiculturalism & pluralism; Patient satisfaction; Perceptions; Preventive medicine; Primary care; Qualitative research; Researchers; Surgery; Survivorship
• ISSN: 1471-2296; 1471-2296
• DOI: 10.1186/s12875-018-0822-6

Colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience difficulty navigating complex care pathways. Sharing care between GPs and specialist services has been proposed to improve health outcomes in cancer survivors following hospital discharge. Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) groups are known to have poorer outcomes following cancer treatment but little is known about their perceptions of shared care following surgery for CRC. This study aimed to explore how non-English-speaking and English-speaking patients perceive care to be coordinated amongst various health practitioners. This was a qualitative study using data from face to face semi-structured interviews and one focus group in a culturally diverse area of Sydney with non-English-speaking and English-speaking CRC survivors. Participants were recruited in community settings and were interviewed in English, Spanish or Vietnamese. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed by researchers fluent in those languages. Data were coded and analysed thematically. Twenty-two CRC survivors participated in the study. Participants from non-English-speaking and English-speaking groups described similar barriers to care, but non-English-speaking participants described additional communication difficulties and perceived discrimination. Non-English-speaking participants relied on family members and bilingual GPs for assistance with communication and care coordination. Factors that influenced the care pathways used by participants and how care was shared between the specialist and GP included patient and practitioner preference, accessibility, complexity of care needs, and requirements for assistance with understanding information and navigating the health system, that were particularly difficult for non-English-speaking CRC survivors. Both non-English-speaking and English-speaking CRC survivors described a blend of specialist-led or GP-led care depending on the complexity of care required, informational needs, and how engaged and accessible they perceived the specialist or GP to be. Findings from this study highlight the role of the bilingual GP in assisting CALD participants to understand information and to navigate their care pathways following CRC surgery.