Analysis of quality of knowledge structure and students’ perceptions in extension concept mapping

• Published in: Research and practice in technology enhanced learning 2022-04, Vol.17 (1), p.1-25, Article 14
• Main Authors: Prasetya, Didik Dwi, Pinandito, Aryo, Hayashi, Yusuke, Hirashima, Tsukasa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Colleges & universities; Concept Mapping; Difficulty Level; Education; Educational Technology; Extension concept map; Intention; Knowledge; Knowledge Level; Knowledge Representation; Learning and Instruction; Perceptions; Program Effectiveness; Quality of propositions; Structural map scores; Student Attitudes; Students; Students' perceptions; Technology Acceptance Model; Technology utilization; Undergraduate Students; Usability; Value Judgment
• ISSN: 1793-7078; 1793-2068; 1793-7078
• DOI: 10.1186/s41039-022-00189-9

Extension concept mapping is a technique to connect prior existing concept maps with new knowledge structures. It offers advantages in each stage of the knowledge-integrating process and encourages learners to improve their performance. While previous studies have confirmed that the extended kit-build concept map outperformed the extended scratch-build approach in terms of comprehension test scores and map size, they have yet to evaluate the quality of concept maps and students' perceptions. Although the size of the concept map components could represent the breadth of personal knowledge, it does not constantly describe the good knowledge structure. In addition, the student's degree of acceptance after the concept mapping demonstrates their intention to use systems in the future. The present study aims to compare the effect of extended scratch-build and extended kit-build on the students' quality of knowledge structures and perceptions. Fifty-five second-year university students were involved and divided into two groups: control and experimental. The control group utilized the extended scratch-build map, while the experimental group used the extended kit-build concept mapping tool. Quality of propositions and structural map scores as learning outcomes were used to measure the students' knowledge structures. The possibility of a relationship between quality scores was expressed using the Spearman correlation. This study involved the Technology Acceptance Model to confirm the students' perceptions of extension concept mapping tools. The perceived ease-of-use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention constructs were used to investigate users' intentions. The findings suggest that the quality of propositions and structural map scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than in the control group. This study also found that the extended kit-build method achieved better perceptions scores than the extended scratch-build.