Loading…
Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection
Physical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Diagnostics (Basel) 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.546 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c478b165dfbc26399a49864336aed5fd2105e68c79e9dd07695cd57ebdb54adb3 |
| container_end_page | |
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 546 |
| container_title | Diagnostics (Basel) |
| container_volume | 12 |
| creator | Leonet-Tijero, Leire Corral-de-Toro, Jaime Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Hernández-Secorún, Mar Abenia-Benedí, Hugo Lucha-López, María Orosia Monti-Ballano, Sofía Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián Tricás-Vidal, Héctor Hidalgo-García, César Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel |
| description | Physical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess the validity and interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection of active cervical ROM in physiotherapy students.
Flexion, extension, both lateral flexions and rotations of a single participant were measured using CROM. Online visual inspection of 18 physiotherapy students against CROM was registered.
The validity, against CROM, of the online visual inspection of the active ROM ranged from good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.83-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection had favorable outcomes in all cervical movements in the three physiotherapy courses (ICC 0.70-0.96), with the visual inspection of the rotations being the most reliable (ICC 0.93-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the classification of mobility was poor to good (Kappa 0.03-0.90).
The interexaminer reliability and validity of the quantification of active cervical movement during online visual inspection was shown to be good to excellent for flexion-extension and lateral flexions and excellent for rotations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/diagnostics12020546 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ed713ff5ef5e42d2b933dfad1cc0508f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ed713ff5ef5e42d2b933dfad1cc0508f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2633889482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c478b165dfbc26399a49864336aed5fd2105e68c79e9dd07695cd57ebdb54adb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhoMottT-AkEGvPFmaz5nkhtBtloXKqVFvQ2Z5Mw2SzZZk5ni_nuz3bW00hCSk-Q9DzkvB6G3BJ8xpvBH580ypjJ6WwjFFAvevkDHFHdixjmRLx_FR-i0lBWuQxEmqXiNjpigmLdMHKPbRRwhwx-z9hFycwPBm94HP24bE13zywTvdoc0NNeTieMhnkO-89aE5ns6qN2UfVw2VzFUUHO-jZVom0UsG7CjT_ENejWYUOD0sJ-gn1-__Jh_m11eXSzmny9nlnM11rWTPWmFG3pLW6aU4Uq2nLHWgBODowQLaKXtFCjncNcqYZ3ooHe94Mb17AQt9lyXzEpvsl-bvNXJeH1_kfJSm1xtC6DBdYQNg4A6OXW0V4y5wThiLRZYDpX1ac_aTP0anIU4ZhOeQJ--RH-rl-lOS9lV93kFfDgAcvo9QRn12hcLIZgIaSq6VsikVFzSKn3_n3SVphyrVTsV7ShXuKsqtlfZnErJMDx8hmC9awz9TGPUrHeP63jI-dcG7C8eGLm0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2632724907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Leonet-Tijero, Leire ; Corral-de-Toro, Jaime ; Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo ; Hernández-Secorún, Mar ; Abenia-Benedí, Hugo ; Lucha-López, María Orosia ; Monti-Ballano, Sofía ; Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián ; Tricás-Vidal, Héctor ; Hidalgo-García, César ; Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</creator><creatorcontrib>Leonet-Tijero, Leire ; Corral-de-Toro, Jaime ; Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo ; Hernández-Secorún, Mar ; Abenia-Benedí, Hugo ; Lucha-López, María Orosia ; Monti-Ballano, Sofía ; Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián ; Tricás-Vidal, Héctor ; Hidalgo-García, César ; Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><description>Physical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess the validity and interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection of active cervical ROM in physiotherapy students.
Flexion, extension, both lateral flexions and rotations of a single participant were measured using CROM. Online visual inspection of 18 physiotherapy students against CROM was registered.
The validity, against CROM, of the online visual inspection of the active ROM ranged from good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.83-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection had favorable outcomes in all cervical movements in the three physiotherapy courses (ICC 0.70-0.96), with the visual inspection of the rotations being the most reliable (ICC 0.93-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the classification of mobility was poor to good (Kappa 0.03-0.90).
The interexaminer reliability and validity of the quantification of active cervical movement during online visual inspection was shown to be good to excellent for flexion-extension and lateral flexions and excellent for rotations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020546</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35204635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Classification ; COVID-19 ; Measurement techniques ; neck ; Pain ; Patients ; physical examination ; Physical therapy ; Questionnaires ; Students ; Telemedicine ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Diagnostics (Basel), 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.546</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 by the authors. 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c478b165dfbc26399a49864336aed5fd2105e68c79e9dd07695cd57ebdb54adb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0419-1943 ; 0000-0001-9678-3449 ; 0000-0001-7667-2178 ; 0000-0002-9930-3903</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2632724907/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2632724907?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793,74412,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35204635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leonet-Tijero, Leire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corral-de-Toro, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Secorún, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abenia-Benedí, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucha-López, María Orosia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti-Ballano, Sofía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricás-Vidal, Héctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo-García, César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><title>Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection</title><title>Diagnostics (Basel)</title><addtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</addtitle><description>Physical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess the validity and interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection of active cervical ROM in physiotherapy students.
Flexion, extension, both lateral flexions and rotations of a single participant were measured using CROM. Online visual inspection of 18 physiotherapy students against CROM was registered.
The validity, against CROM, of the online visual inspection of the active ROM ranged from good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.83-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection had favorable outcomes in all cervical movements in the three physiotherapy courses (ICC 0.70-0.96), with the visual inspection of the rotations being the most reliable (ICC 0.93-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the classification of mobility was poor to good (Kappa 0.03-0.90).
The interexaminer reliability and validity of the quantification of active cervical movement during online visual inspection was shown to be good to excellent for flexion-extension and lateral flexions and excellent for rotations.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>neck</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>physical examination</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2075-4418</issn><issn>2075-4418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhoMottT-AkEGvPFmaz5nkhtBtloXKqVFvQ2Z5Mw2SzZZk5ni_nuz3bW00hCSk-Q9DzkvB6G3BJ8xpvBH580ypjJ6WwjFFAvevkDHFHdixjmRLx_FR-i0lBWuQxEmqXiNjpigmLdMHKPbRRwhwx-z9hFycwPBm94HP24bE13zywTvdoc0NNeTieMhnkO-89aE5ns6qN2UfVw2VzFUUHO-jZVom0UsG7CjT_ENejWYUOD0sJ-gn1-__Jh_m11eXSzmny9nlnM11rWTPWmFG3pLW6aU4Uq2nLHWgBODowQLaKXtFCjncNcqYZ3ooHe94Mb17AQt9lyXzEpvsl-bvNXJeH1_kfJSm1xtC6DBdYQNg4A6OXW0V4y5wThiLRZYDpX1ac_aTP0anIU4ZhOeQJ--RH-rl-lOS9lV93kFfDgAcvo9QRn12hcLIZgIaSq6VsikVFzSKn3_n3SVphyrVTsV7ShXuKsqtlfZnErJMDx8hmC9awz9TGPUrHeP63jI-dcG7C8eGLm0</recordid><startdate>20220221</startdate><enddate>20220221</enddate><creator>Leonet-Tijero, Leire</creator><creator>Corral-de-Toro, Jaime</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo</creator><creator>Hernández-Secorún, Mar</creator><creator>Abenia-Benedí, Hugo</creator><creator>Lucha-López, María Orosia</creator><creator>Monti-Ballano, Sofía</creator><creator>Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián</creator><creator>Tricás-Vidal, Héctor</creator><creator>Hidalgo-García, César</creator><creator>Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-1943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-3449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-2178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9930-3903</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220221</creationdate><title>Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection</title><author>Leonet-Tijero, Leire ; Corral-de-Toro, Jaime ; Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo ; Hernández-Secorún, Mar ; Abenia-Benedí, Hugo ; Lucha-López, María Orosia ; Monti-Ballano, Sofía ; Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián ; Tricás-Vidal, Héctor ; Hidalgo-García, César ; Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c478b165dfbc26399a49864336aed5fd2105e68c79e9dd07695cd57ebdb54adb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>neck</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>physical examination</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leonet-Tijero, Leire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corral-de-Toro, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Secorún, Mar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abenia-Benedí, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucha-López, María Orosia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monti-Ballano, Sofía</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricás-Vidal, Héctor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hidalgo-García, César</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leonet-Tijero, Leire</au><au>Corral-de-Toro, Jaime</au><au>Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo</au><au>Hernández-Secorún, Mar</au><au>Abenia-Benedí, Hugo</au><au>Lucha-López, María Orosia</au><au>Monti-Ballano, Sofía</au><au>Müller-Thyssen-Uriarte, Julián</au><au>Tricás-Vidal, Héctor</au><au>Hidalgo-García, César</au><au>Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</addtitle><date>2022-02-21</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>546</spage><pages>546-</pages><issn>2075-4418</issn><eissn>2075-4418</eissn><abstract>Physical therapists routinely measure range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine. The reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device has been demonstrated in several studies, but current evidence on the validity and reliability of the visual inspection is contradictory. The aim is to assess the validity and interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection of active cervical ROM in physiotherapy students.
Flexion, extension, both lateral flexions and rotations of a single participant were measured using CROM. Online visual inspection of 18 physiotherapy students against CROM was registered.
The validity, against CROM, of the online visual inspection of the active ROM ranged from good to excellent (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) 0.83-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the online visual inspection had favorable outcomes in all cervical movements in the three physiotherapy courses (ICC 0.70-0.96), with the visual inspection of the rotations being the most reliable (ICC 0.93-0.97). Interexaminer reliability of the classification of mobility was poor to good (Kappa 0.03-0.90).
The interexaminer reliability and validity of the quantification of active cervical movement during online visual inspection was shown to be good to excellent for flexion-extension and lateral flexions and excellent for rotations.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>35204635</pmid><doi>10.3390/diagnostics12020546</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0419-1943</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-3449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7667-2178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9930-3903</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2075-4418 |
| ispartof | Diagnostics (Basel), 2022-02, Vol.12 (2), p.546 |
| issn | 2075-4418 2075-4418 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ed713ff5ef5e42d2b933dfad1cc0508f |
| source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
| subjects | Classification COVID-19 Measurement techniques neck Pain Patients physical examination Physical therapy Questionnaires Students Telemedicine Validity |
| title | Interexaminer Reliability and Validity of Quantity of Cervical Mobility during Online Dynamic Inspection |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T10%3A37%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interexaminer%20Reliability%20and%20Validity%20of%20Quantity%20of%20Cervical%20Mobility%20during%20Online%20Dynamic%20Inspection&rft.jtitle=Diagnostics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Leonet-Tijero,%20Leire&rft.date=2022-02-21&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=546&rft.pages=546-&rft.issn=2075-4418&rft.eissn=2075-4418&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/diagnostics12020546&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2633889482%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c478b165dfbc26399a49864336aed5fd2105e68c79e9dd07695cd57ebdb54adb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2632724907&rft_id=info:pmid/35204635&rfr_iscdi=true |