Loading…

How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment

Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geosciences (Basel) 2018-11, Vol.8 (11), p.415
Main Authors: De Serio, Francesca, Armenio, Elvira, Mossa, Michele, Petrillo, Antonio Felice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page 415
container_title Geosciences (Basel)
container_volume 8
creator De Serio, Francesca
Armenio, Elvira
Mossa, Michele
Petrillo, Antonio Felice
description Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/geosciences8110415
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ee14c6ccb4714ec6bf770ebb2330accb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ee14c6ccb4714ec6bf770ebb2330accb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2582825405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKcFz6v53KTgpdSPFgp6UK8hm8yWlO2mJinSf2-0IoJzmeHhnXeGF6FLgq8Zm-KbNYRkPQwWkiIEcyJO0Ihi2dSMNuz0z3yOJiltcKkpYYrxEbpdhI8qh-oOOj9A9Rx9iD57SJUfqnkwKZu-etv3A0TT-t7nQzVLCVLawpAv0Fln-gSTnz5Grw_3L_NFvXp6XM5nq9oyJXJNsKGuxYo7I5UFK1sKygkwVE07qkgjTYG8KxSI4M45YRWUFSsdAQtsjJZHXxfMRu-i35p40MF4_Q1CXGsTs7c9aADCbWNtyyXhYJu2kxJD21LGsCm4eF0dvXYxvO8hZb0J-ziU9zUViioqOBZFRY8qG0NKEbrfqwTrr9D1_9DZJ_jVeQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582825405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>De Serio, Francesca ; Armenio, Elvira ; Mossa, Michele ; Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creator><creatorcontrib>De Serio, Francesca ; Armenio, Elvira ; Mossa, Michele ; Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creatorcontrib><description>Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8110415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; analytical hierarchical process (AHP) ; Beaches ; Climate change ; Coastal management ; coastal morphodynamics ; Coastal processes ; coastal vulnerability index ; Coasts ; Earth science ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Geographic information systems ; geographic information systems (GIS) ; Geographical information systems ; Information systems ; Mathematical analysis ; Motivation ; Parameters ; Physical properties ; Process parameters ; Ranking ; Rivers ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic aspects ; Socioeconomics ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Geosciences (Basel), 2018-11, Vol.8 (11), p.415</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2326-9841 ; 0000-0002-6477-8714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2582825405/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2582825405?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Serio, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armenio, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creatorcontrib><title>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</title><title>Geosciences (Basel)</title><description>Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>analytical hierarchical process (AHP)</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coastal management</subject><subject>coastal morphodynamics</subject><subject>Coastal processes</subject><subject>coastal vulnerability index</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>geographic information systems (GIS)</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic aspects</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>2076-3263</issn><issn>2076-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKcFz6v53KTgpdSPFgp6UK8hm8yWlO2mJinSf2-0IoJzmeHhnXeGF6FLgq8Zm-KbNYRkPQwWkiIEcyJO0Ihi2dSMNuz0z3yOJiltcKkpYYrxEbpdhI8qh-oOOj9A9Rx9iD57SJUfqnkwKZu-etv3A0TT-t7nQzVLCVLawpAv0Fln-gSTnz5Grw_3L_NFvXp6XM5nq9oyJXJNsKGuxYo7I5UFK1sKygkwVE07qkgjTYG8KxSI4M45YRWUFSsdAQtsjJZHXxfMRu-i35p40MF4_Q1CXGsTs7c9aADCbWNtyyXhYJu2kxJD21LGsCm4eF0dvXYxvO8hZb0J-ziU9zUViioqOBZFRY8qG0NKEbrfqwTrr9D1_9DZJ_jVeQg</recordid><startdate>20181112</startdate><enddate>20181112</enddate><creator>De Serio, Francesca</creator><creator>Armenio, Elvira</creator><creator>Mossa, Michele</creator><creator>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-9841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-8714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181112</creationdate><title>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</title><author>De Serio, Francesca ; Armenio, Elvira ; Mossa, Michele ; Petrillo, Antonio Felice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>analytical hierarchical process (AHP)</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coastal management</topic><topic>coastal morphodynamics</topic><topic>Coastal processes</topic><topic>coastal vulnerability index</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>geographic information systems (GIS)</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic aspects</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Serio, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armenio, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geosciences (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Serio, Francesca</au><au>Armenio, Elvira</au><au>Mossa, Michele</au><au>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Geosciences (Basel)</jtitle><date>2018-11-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>415</spage><pages>415-</pages><issn>2076-3263</issn><eissn>2076-3263</eissn><abstract>Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/geosciences8110415</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-9841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-8714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-3263
ispartof Geosciences (Basel), 2018-11, Vol.8 (11), p.415
issn 2076-3263
2076-3263
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ee14c6ccb4714ec6bf770ebb2330accb
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analytic hierarchy process
analytical hierarchical process (AHP)
Beaches
Climate change
Coastal management
coastal morphodynamics
Coastal processes
coastal vulnerability index
Coasts
Earth science
Economic factors
Economics
Geographic information systems
geographic information systems (GIS)
Geographical information systems
Information systems
Mathematical analysis
Motivation
Parameters
Physical properties
Process parameters
Ranking
Rivers
Social factors
Socioeconomic aspects
Socioeconomics
Vulnerability
title How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20Define%20Priorities%20in%20Coastal%20Vulnerability%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Geosciences%20(Basel)&rft.au=De%20Serio,%20Francesca&rft.date=2018-11-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=415&rft.pages=415-&rft.issn=2076-3263&rft.eissn=2076-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/geosciences8110415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2582825405%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582825405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true