Loading…
How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment
Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geosciences (Basel) 2018-11, Vol.8 (11), p.415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 415 |
container_title | Geosciences (Basel) |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | De Serio, Francesca Armenio, Elvira Mossa, Michele Petrillo, Antonio Felice |
description | Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/geosciences8110415 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ee14c6ccb4714ec6bf770ebb2330accb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ee14c6ccb4714ec6bf770ebb2330accb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2582825405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKcFz6v53KTgpdSPFgp6UK8hm8yWlO2mJinSf2-0IoJzmeHhnXeGF6FLgq8Zm-KbNYRkPQwWkiIEcyJO0Ihi2dSMNuz0z3yOJiltcKkpYYrxEbpdhI8qh-oOOj9A9Rx9iD57SJUfqnkwKZu-etv3A0TT-t7nQzVLCVLawpAv0Fln-gSTnz5Grw_3L_NFvXp6XM5nq9oyJXJNsKGuxYo7I5UFK1sKygkwVE07qkgjTYG8KxSI4M45YRWUFSsdAQtsjJZHXxfMRu-i35p40MF4_Q1CXGsTs7c9aADCbWNtyyXhYJu2kxJD21LGsCm4eF0dvXYxvO8hZb0J-ziU9zUViioqOBZFRY8qG0NKEbrfqwTrr9D1_9DZJ_jVeQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582825405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>De Serio, Francesca ; Armenio, Elvira ; Mossa, Michele ; Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creator><creatorcontrib>De Serio, Francesca ; Armenio, Elvira ; Mossa, Michele ; Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creatorcontrib><description>Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-3263</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-3263</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/geosciences8110415</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; analytical hierarchical process (AHP) ; Beaches ; Climate change ; Coastal management ; coastal morphodynamics ; Coastal processes ; coastal vulnerability index ; Coasts ; Earth science ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Geographic information systems ; geographic information systems (GIS) ; Geographical information systems ; Information systems ; Mathematical analysis ; Motivation ; Parameters ; Physical properties ; Process parameters ; Ranking ; Rivers ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic aspects ; Socioeconomics ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Geosciences (Basel), 2018-11, Vol.8 (11), p.415</ispartof><rights>2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2326-9841 ; 0000-0002-6477-8714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2582825405/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2582825405?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Serio, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armenio, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creatorcontrib><title>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</title><title>Geosciences (Basel)</title><description>Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>analytical hierarchical process (AHP)</subject><subject>Beaches</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coastal management</subject><subject>coastal morphodynamics</subject><subject>Coastal processes</subject><subject>coastal vulnerability index</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>geographic information systems (GIS)</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic aspects</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>2076-3263</issn><issn>2076-3263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEQhoMoWGr_gKcFz6v53KTgpdSPFgp6UK8hm8yWlO2mJinSf2-0IoJzmeHhnXeGF6FLgq8Zm-KbNYRkPQwWkiIEcyJO0Ihi2dSMNuz0z3yOJiltcKkpYYrxEbpdhI8qh-oOOj9A9Rx9iD57SJUfqnkwKZu-etv3A0TT-t7nQzVLCVLawpAv0Fln-gSTnz5Grw_3L_NFvXp6XM5nq9oyJXJNsKGuxYo7I5UFK1sKygkwVE07qkgjTYG8KxSI4M45YRWUFSsdAQtsjJZHXxfMRu-i35p40MF4_Q1CXGsTs7c9aADCbWNtyyXhYJu2kxJD21LGsCm4eF0dvXYxvO8hZb0J-ziU9zUViioqOBZFRY8qG0NKEbrfqwTrr9D1_9DZJ_jVeQg</recordid><startdate>20181112</startdate><enddate>20181112</enddate><creator>De Serio, Francesca</creator><creator>Armenio, Elvira</creator><creator>Mossa, Michele</creator><creator>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-9841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-8714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181112</creationdate><title>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</title><author>De Serio, Francesca ; Armenio, Elvira ; Mossa, Michele ; Petrillo, Antonio Felice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>analytical hierarchical process (AHP)</topic><topic>Beaches</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coastal management</topic><topic>coastal morphodynamics</topic><topic>Coastal processes</topic><topic>coastal vulnerability index</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>geographic information systems (GIS)</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic aspects</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Serio, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Armenio, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Geosciences (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Serio, Francesca</au><au>Armenio, Elvira</au><au>Mossa, Michele</au><au>Petrillo, Antonio Felice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment</atitle><jtitle>Geosciences (Basel)</jtitle><date>2018-11-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>415</spage><pages>415-</pages><issn>2076-3263</issn><eissn>2076-3263</eissn><abstract>Awareness of coastal landscapes vulnerability to both natural and man-made hazards induce to monitor their evolution, adaptation, resilience and to develop appropriate defence strategies. The necessity to transform the monitoring results into useful information is the motivation of the present paper. Usually, to this scope, a coastal vulnerability index is deduced, by assigning ranking values to the different parameters governing the coastal processes. The principal limitation of this procedure is the individual discretion used in ranking. Moreover, physical parameters are generally considered, omitting socio-economic factors. The aim of the present study is to complement a geographical information system (GIS) with an analytical hierarchical process (AHP), thus allowing an objective prioritization of the key parameters. Furthermore, in the present case, socio-economic parameters have been added to physical ones. Employing them jointly, an integrated coastal vulnerability index (ICVI) has been estimated and its effectiveness has been investigated. To show how it works, the proposed method has been applied to a portion of the Adriatic coastline, along the Apulian region in southern Italy. It has permitted to identify and prioritize the most vulnerable areas, revealing its efficacy as a potential tool to support coastal planning and management.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/geosciences8110415</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2326-9841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6477-8714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2076-3263 |
ispartof | Geosciences (Basel), 2018-11, Vol.8 (11), p.415 |
issn | 2076-3263 2076-3263 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ee14c6ccb4714ec6bf770ebb2330accb |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analytic hierarchy process analytical hierarchical process (AHP) Beaches Climate change Coastal management coastal morphodynamics Coastal processes coastal vulnerability index Coasts Earth science Economic factors Economics Geographic information systems geographic information systems (GIS) Geographical information systems Information systems Mathematical analysis Motivation Parameters Physical properties Process parameters Ranking Rivers Social factors Socioeconomic aspects Socioeconomics Vulnerability |
title | How to Define Priorities in Coastal Vulnerability Assessment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A12%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20to%20Define%20Priorities%20in%20Coastal%20Vulnerability%20Assessment&rft.jtitle=Geosciences%20(Basel)&rft.au=De%20Serio,%20Francesca&rft.date=2018-11-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=415&rft.pages=415-&rft.issn=2076-3263&rft.eissn=2076-3263&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/geosciences8110415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2582825405%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-10a2db084da78cec7b2e8d5ea289f28167aec74f2e8e154ddd5c8e2dbc7d1ece3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582825405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |