Loading…

Implications of target signal choice in passive acoustic monitoring: an example of age‐ and sex‐dependent vocal repertoire use in African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis)

Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling acoustically active animal species and is particularly useful for elusive, visually cryptic species inhabiting remote or inaccessible habitats. Key advantages of PAM are large spatial coverage and continuous, long...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing in ecology and conservation 2024-08, Vol.10 (4), p.435-447
Main Authors: Swider, Colin R., Hedwig, Daniela, Wrege, Peter H., Parks, Susan E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-170fe590e21a5f929a4ebdb2dbef860ef4dcb961372468479fc9e10e0a3dd7753
container_end_page 447
container_issue 4
container_start_page 435
container_title Remote sensing in ecology and conservation
container_volume 10
creator Swider, Colin R.
Hedwig, Daniela
Wrege, Peter H.
Parks, Susan E.
description Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling acoustically active animal species and is particularly useful for elusive, visually cryptic species inhabiting remote or inaccessible habitats. Key advantages of PAM are large spatial coverage and continuous, long‐term monitoring. In most cases, a signal detection algorithm is utilized to locate sounds of interest within long sequences of audio data. It is important to understand the demographic/contextual usage of call types when choosing a particular signal to use for detection. Sampling biases may result if sampling is restricted to subsets of the population, for example, when detectable vocalizations are produced only by a certain demographic class. Using the African forest elephant repertoire as a case study, we test for differences in call type usage among different age‐sex classes. We identified disproportionate usage by age‐sex class of four call types—roars, trumpets, rumbles, and combination calls. This differential usage of signals by demographic class has implications for the use of particular call types in PAM for this species. Our results highlight that forest elephant PAM studies that have used rumbles as target signals may have under‐sampled adult males. The addition of other call types to PAM frameworks may be useful to leverage additional population demographic information from these surveys. Our research exemplifies how an examination of a species' acoustic behavior can be used to better contextualize the data and results from PAM and to strengthen the resulting inference. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling elusive and visually cryptic species that are acoustically active but difficult to study using other methods. However, the vocal behavior of such species is often not well understood, limiting the inference that can be reliably drawn from PAM. We explore the implications of demographic patterns in vocal behavior and repertoire use for PAM, using a case study of the critically endangered African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) in the Congo basin. We highlight how the age and sex specificity of potential PAM target signals will determine the subset of the population that is sampled, and we suggest that this aspect of PAM should receive more attention in future studies, regardless of species.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rse2.380
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef0102c28b79496590ba30bc0f965412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ef0102c28b79496590ba30bc0f965412</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3097817154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-170fe590e21a5f929a4ebdb2dbef860ef4dcb961372468479fc9e10e0a3dd7753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQgCMEElWpxCNY4lIOKWPHiRNuVVVgpZWQ-Dlbjj1Ovcrawfa2uzcegXfhjXgSvF2EuHDyzOjTN-OZqnpJ4YoCsDcxIbtqenhSnTFou7rhffv0n_h5dZHSBgBoxwQV_Vn1c7VdZqdVdsEnEizJKk6YSXKTVzPRd8FpJM6TRaXk7pEoHXYpO022wbscovPTW6I8wb0qJjwq1IS_vv8oRUMS7ktocEFv0GdyH3SxxpLHHFxEskuP9msbyxCe2BAxZYIzLnfK50Qu12EfTPBZEX3Qc8guvX5RPbNqTnjx5z2vvr67_XLzoV5_fL-6uV7Xumk51FSAxXYAZFS1dmCD4jiakZkRbd8BWm70OHS0EYx3PReD1QNSQFCNMUK0zXm1OnlNUBu5RLdV8SCDcvKxEOIkVSyrmFGiBQpMs34UAx-60nVUDYwabEk4ZcX16uRaYvi2K3-Um7CLZcVJNjCIngra8kJdnigdQ0oR7d-uFOTxwvJ4YVkuXND6hD64GQ__5eSnz7fsyP8GjJWryw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097817154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of target signal choice in passive acoustic monitoring: an example of age‐ and sex‐dependent vocal repertoire use in African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis)</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Swider, Colin R. ; Hedwig, Daniela ; Wrege, Peter H. ; Parks, Susan E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swider, Colin R. ; Hedwig, Daniela ; Wrege, Peter H. ; Parks, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><description>Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling acoustically active animal species and is particularly useful for elusive, visually cryptic species inhabiting remote or inaccessible habitats. Key advantages of PAM are large spatial coverage and continuous, long‐term monitoring. In most cases, a signal detection algorithm is utilized to locate sounds of interest within long sequences of audio data. It is important to understand the demographic/contextual usage of call types when choosing a particular signal to use for detection. Sampling biases may result if sampling is restricted to subsets of the population, for example, when detectable vocalizations are produced only by a certain demographic class. Using the African forest elephant repertoire as a case study, we test for differences in call type usage among different age‐sex classes. We identified disproportionate usage by age‐sex class of four call types—roars, trumpets, rumbles, and combination calls. This differential usage of signals by demographic class has implications for the use of particular call types in PAM for this species. Our results highlight that forest elephant PAM studies that have used rumbles as target signals may have under‐sampled adult males. The addition of other call types to PAM frameworks may be useful to leverage additional population demographic information from these surveys. Our research exemplifies how an examination of a species' acoustic behavior can be used to better contextualize the data and results from PAM and to strengthen the resulting inference. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling elusive and visually cryptic species that are acoustically active but difficult to study using other methods. However, the vocal behavior of such species is often not well understood, limiting the inference that can be reliably drawn from PAM. We explore the implications of demographic patterns in vocal behavior and repertoire use for PAM, using a case study of the critically endangered African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) in the Congo basin. We highlight how the age and sex specificity of potential PAM target signals will determine the subset of the population that is sampled, and we suggest that this aspect of PAM should receive more attention in future studies, regardless of species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2056-3485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2056-3485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rse2.380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustic tracking ; Acoustics ; African forest elephants ; Age ; Algorithms ; Animal populations ; Animal species ; Audio data ; Auditory communication ; Behavior ; call type ; Cryptic species ; Data collection ; Demographics ; Demography ; detection ; Elephants ; endangered species ; Females ; Gorillas ; Loxodonta cyclotis ; National parks ; passive acoustic monitoring ; Population studies ; Remote monitoring ; Remote sensing ; repertoire ; Sampling ; Sex ; Signal detection ; Vocalization behavior</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2024-08, Vol.10 (4), p.435-447</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Zoological Society of London.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-170fe590e21a5f929a4ebdb2dbef860ef4dcb961372468479fc9e10e0a3dd7753</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9693-6505</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097817154/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3097817154?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11538,25728,27898,27899,36986,44563,46024,46448,75093</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swider, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedwig, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrege, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of target signal choice in passive acoustic monitoring: an example of age‐ and sex‐dependent vocal repertoire use in African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis)</title><title>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</title><description>Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling acoustically active animal species and is particularly useful for elusive, visually cryptic species inhabiting remote or inaccessible habitats. Key advantages of PAM are large spatial coverage and continuous, long‐term monitoring. In most cases, a signal detection algorithm is utilized to locate sounds of interest within long sequences of audio data. It is important to understand the demographic/contextual usage of call types when choosing a particular signal to use for detection. Sampling biases may result if sampling is restricted to subsets of the population, for example, when detectable vocalizations are produced only by a certain demographic class. Using the African forest elephant repertoire as a case study, we test for differences in call type usage among different age‐sex classes. We identified disproportionate usage by age‐sex class of four call types—roars, trumpets, rumbles, and combination calls. This differential usage of signals by demographic class has implications for the use of particular call types in PAM for this species. Our results highlight that forest elephant PAM studies that have used rumbles as target signals may have under‐sampled adult males. The addition of other call types to PAM frameworks may be useful to leverage additional population demographic information from these surveys. Our research exemplifies how an examination of a species' acoustic behavior can be used to better contextualize the data and results from PAM and to strengthen the resulting inference. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling elusive and visually cryptic species that are acoustically active but difficult to study using other methods. However, the vocal behavior of such species is often not well understood, limiting the inference that can be reliably drawn from PAM. We explore the implications of demographic patterns in vocal behavior and repertoire use for PAM, using a case study of the critically endangered African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) in the Congo basin. We highlight how the age and sex specificity of potential PAM target signals will determine the subset of the population that is sampled, and we suggest that this aspect of PAM should receive more attention in future studies, regardless of species.</description><subject>Acoustic tracking</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>African forest elephants</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal species</subject><subject>Audio data</subject><subject>Auditory communication</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>call type</subject><subject>Cryptic species</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>Elephants</subject><subject>endangered species</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gorillas</subject><subject>Loxodonta cyclotis</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>passive acoustic monitoring</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><subject>repertoire</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Signal detection</subject><subject>Vocalization behavior</subject><issn>2056-3485</issn><issn>2056-3485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAQgCMEElWpxCNY4lIOKWPHiRNuVVVgpZWQ-Dlbjj1Ovcrawfa2uzcegXfhjXgSvF2EuHDyzOjTN-OZqnpJ4YoCsDcxIbtqenhSnTFou7rhffv0n_h5dZHSBgBoxwQV_Vn1c7VdZqdVdsEnEizJKk6YSXKTVzPRd8FpJM6TRaXk7pEoHXYpO022wbscovPTW6I8wb0qJjwq1IS_vv8oRUMS7ktocEFv0GdyH3SxxpLHHFxEskuP9msbyxCe2BAxZYIzLnfK50Qu12EfTPBZEX3Qc8guvX5RPbNqTnjx5z2vvr67_XLzoV5_fL-6uV7Xumk51FSAxXYAZFS1dmCD4jiakZkRbd8BWm70OHS0EYx3PReD1QNSQFCNMUK0zXm1OnlNUBu5RLdV8SCDcvKxEOIkVSyrmFGiBQpMs34UAx-60nVUDYwabEk4ZcX16uRaYvi2K3-Um7CLZcVJNjCIngra8kJdnigdQ0oR7d-uFOTxwvJ4YVkuXND6hD64GQ__5eSnz7fsyP8GjJWryw</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Swider, Colin R.</creator><creator>Hedwig, Daniela</creator><creator>Wrege, Peter H.</creator><creator>Parks, Susan E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-6505</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Implications of target signal choice in passive acoustic monitoring: an example of age‐ and sex‐dependent vocal repertoire use in African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis)</title><author>Swider, Colin R. ; Hedwig, Daniela ; Wrege, Peter H. ; Parks, Susan E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-170fe590e21a5f929a4ebdb2dbef860ef4dcb961372468479fc9e10e0a3dd7753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acoustic tracking</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>African forest elephants</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal species</topic><topic>Audio data</topic><topic>Auditory communication</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>call type</topic><topic>Cryptic species</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>Elephants</topic><topic>endangered species</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gorillas</topic><topic>Loxodonta cyclotis</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>passive acoustic monitoring</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><topic>repertoire</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Signal detection</topic><topic>Vocalization behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swider, Colin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedwig, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wrege, Peter H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parks, Susan E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swider, Colin R.</au><au>Hedwig, Daniela</au><au>Wrege, Peter H.</au><au>Parks, Susan E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of target signal choice in passive acoustic monitoring: an example of age‐ and sex‐dependent vocal repertoire use in African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis)</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing in ecology and conservation</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>447</epage><pages>435-447</pages><issn>2056-3485</issn><eissn>2056-3485</eissn><abstract>Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling acoustically active animal species and is particularly useful for elusive, visually cryptic species inhabiting remote or inaccessible habitats. Key advantages of PAM are large spatial coverage and continuous, long‐term monitoring. In most cases, a signal detection algorithm is utilized to locate sounds of interest within long sequences of audio data. It is important to understand the demographic/contextual usage of call types when choosing a particular signal to use for detection. Sampling biases may result if sampling is restricted to subsets of the population, for example, when detectable vocalizations are produced only by a certain demographic class. Using the African forest elephant repertoire as a case study, we test for differences in call type usage among different age‐sex classes. We identified disproportionate usage by age‐sex class of four call types—roars, trumpets, rumbles, and combination calls. This differential usage of signals by demographic class has implications for the use of particular call types in PAM for this species. Our results highlight that forest elephant PAM studies that have used rumbles as target signals may have under‐sampled adult males. The addition of other call types to PAM frameworks may be useful to leverage additional population demographic information from these surveys. Our research exemplifies how an examination of a species' acoustic behavior can be used to better contextualize the data and results from PAM and to strengthen the resulting inference. Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an effective remote sensing approach for sampling elusive and visually cryptic species that are acoustically active but difficult to study using other methods. However, the vocal behavior of such species is often not well understood, limiting the inference that can be reliably drawn from PAM. We explore the implications of demographic patterns in vocal behavior and repertoire use for PAM, using a case study of the critically endangered African forest elephant (Loxodonta cyclotis) in the Congo basin. We highlight how the age and sex specificity of potential PAM target signals will determine the subset of the population that is sampled, and we suggest that this aspect of PAM should receive more attention in future studies, regardless of species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rse2.380</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-6505</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2056-3485
ispartof Remote sensing in ecology and conservation, 2024-08, Vol.10 (4), p.435-447
issn 2056-3485
2056-3485
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef0102c28b79496590ba30bc0f965412
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access
subjects Acoustic tracking
Acoustics
African forest elephants
Age
Algorithms
Animal populations
Animal species
Audio data
Auditory communication
Behavior
call type
Cryptic species
Data collection
Demographics
Demography
detection
Elephants
endangered species
Females
Gorillas
Loxodonta cyclotis
National parks
passive acoustic monitoring
Population studies
Remote monitoring
Remote sensing
repertoire
Sampling
Sex
Signal detection
Vocalization behavior
title Implications of target signal choice in passive acoustic monitoring: an example of age‐ and sex‐dependent vocal repertoire use in African forest elephants (Loxodonta cyclotis)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-26T17%3A58%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20target%20signal%20choice%20in%20passive%20acoustic%20monitoring:%20an%20example%20of%20age%E2%80%90%20and%20sex%E2%80%90dependent%20vocal%20repertoire%20use%20in%20African%20forest%20elephants%20(Loxodonta%20cyclotis)&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20in%20ecology%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Swider,%20Colin%20R.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=447&rft.pages=435-447&rft.issn=2056-3485&rft.eissn=2056-3485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rse2.380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3097817154%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3540-170fe590e21a5f929a4ebdb2dbef860ef4dcb961372468479fc9e10e0a3dd7753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097817154&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true