Loading…

Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis

Background Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a very common disease, affecting about 1/10 people in their lifetime. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) had been demonstrated to be useful in achieving helpful effects for plantar fasciopathy. The purpose of this study was to compare the pain and functional outcomes b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2020-09, Vol.15 (1), p.1-432, Article 432
Main Authors: Yu, Tao, Xia, Jiang, Li, Bing, Zhou, Haichao, Yang, Yunfeng, Yu, Guangrong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3
container_end_page 432
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
container_volume 15
creator Yu, Tao
Xia, Jiang
Li, Bing
Zhou, Haichao
Yang, Yunfeng
Yu, Guangrong
description Background Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a very common disease, affecting about 1/10 people in their lifetime. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) had been demonstrated to be useful in achieving helpful effects for plantar fasciopathy. The purpose of this study was to compare the pain and functional outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid (CS) or placebo for plantar fasciopathy through meta-analysis and provide the best evidence. Methods Literature was searched systematically to explore related studies that were published in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline, SpringerLink, OVID, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles regarding comparative research about the outcomes of PRP therapy and CS or placebo injection were selected. Data of pain and functional outcomes was extracted and imported into Reviewer Manager 5.3 to analyze. Results Thirteen RCTs were included and analyzed. Analysis results showed significant superiority of PRP in outcome scores when compared with CS (VAS: MD = - 0.85, P < 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%; AOFAS: MD = 10.05, P < 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%), whereas there is no statistical difference in well-designed double-blind trials (VAS: MD = 0.15, P = 0.72, I.sup.2 = 1%; AOFAS: MD = 2.71, P = 0.17, I.sup.2 = 0%). In the comparison of the PRP and the placebo, the pooled mean difference was - 3.76 (P < 0.0001, 95% CI = - 4.34 to - 3.18). Conclusions No superiority of PRP had been found in well-designed double-blind studies, whereas it is implied that the outcomes of PRP are better than placebo based on available evidence. Keywords: Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroid, Fasciopathy, Therapy
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s13018-020-01783-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef0d7b0c81a841629959b7d9cdf94a6f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A636889012</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ef0d7b0c81a841629959b7d9cdf94a6f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A636889012</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURx19U_4KnBi5de89mpeBCWxY-FhT2o4C2kk8pMhu7OmPQszL83s7OoI5JDKpVXr6oer2leU3JJKfTvCuWEQkcY6QhVwDv1pDmnSuhOaf3j6V_xWfOilA0hkkgQz5szzrQEIvrz5uvdbnFpwtKm0G5Hu-CIS5ejWx9eZbJtSPkQzovNbbDFxbS1y3r_vrXtgGXp8D56nB22ZT8vayyxvGyeBTsWfPV4XzTfP338dv2lu737fHN9dds5KcjSgWJckIEoTqXzEHCQQXngAOgdOOWAcQ6qziw8B-SSBem14oIxH7ge-EVzc-T1yW7MNsfJ5r1JNpqHRMorY_MS3YgGA_FqIA6oBUF7prXUg_La-aCF7UPl-nDk2u6GqfbHecl2PCE9_Znj2qzSvanzCZBQCd4-EuT0c1eFMVMsDseqHKZdMUwIAQqE5BX65h_oJu3yXKWqKEk17bno_6BWti4Q55BqX3cgNVc97wE0oayiLv-DqsfjFF2aMcSaPylgxwKXUykZw-8dKTEHW5mjrUy1lXmwlVH8FyqFvV0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2451916346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yu, Tao ; Xia, Jiang ; Li, Bing ; Zhou, Haichao ; Yang, Yunfeng ; Yu, Guangrong</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao ; Xia, Jiang ; Li, Bing ; Zhou, Haichao ; Yang, Yunfeng ; Yu, Guangrong</creatorcontrib><description>Background Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a very common disease, affecting about 1/10 people in their lifetime. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) had been demonstrated to be useful in achieving helpful effects for plantar fasciopathy. The purpose of this study was to compare the pain and functional outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid (CS) or placebo for plantar fasciopathy through meta-analysis and provide the best evidence. Methods Literature was searched systematically to explore related studies that were published in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline, SpringerLink, OVID, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles regarding comparative research about the outcomes of PRP therapy and CS or placebo injection were selected. Data of pain and functional outcomes was extracted and imported into Reviewer Manager 5.3 to analyze. Results Thirteen RCTs were included and analyzed. Analysis results showed significant superiority of PRP in outcome scores when compared with CS (VAS: MD = - 0.85, P &lt; 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%; AOFAS: MD = 10.05, P &lt; 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%), whereas there is no statistical difference in well-designed double-blind trials (VAS: MD = 0.15, P = 0.72, I.sup.2 = 1%; AOFAS: MD = 2.71, P = 0.17, I.sup.2 = 0%). In the comparison of the PRP and the placebo, the pooled mean difference was - 3.76 (P &lt; 0.0001, 95% CI = - 4.34 to - 3.18). Conclusions No superiority of PRP had been found in well-designed double-blind studies, whereas it is implied that the outcomes of PRP are better than placebo based on available evidence. Keywords: Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroid, Fasciopathy, Therapy</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-799X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-799X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01783-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32958046</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Bias ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Corticosteroid ; Corticosteroids ; Fasciopathy ; Glucocorticoids ; Orthopedics ; Pain ; Plantar fasciitis ; Plasma ; Platelet-rich plasma ; Platelets ; Sensitivity analysis ; Systematic Review ; Therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020-09, Vol.15 (1), p.1-432, Article 432</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7504858/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2451916346?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Haichao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Guangrong</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</title><description>Background Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a very common disease, affecting about 1/10 people in their lifetime. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) had been demonstrated to be useful in achieving helpful effects for plantar fasciopathy. The purpose of this study was to compare the pain and functional outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid (CS) or placebo for plantar fasciopathy through meta-analysis and provide the best evidence. Methods Literature was searched systematically to explore related studies that were published in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline, SpringerLink, OVID, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles regarding comparative research about the outcomes of PRP therapy and CS or placebo injection were selected. Data of pain and functional outcomes was extracted and imported into Reviewer Manager 5.3 to analyze. Results Thirteen RCTs were included and analyzed. Analysis results showed significant superiority of PRP in outcome scores when compared with CS (VAS: MD = - 0.85, P &lt; 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%; AOFAS: MD = 10.05, P &lt; 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%), whereas there is no statistical difference in well-designed double-blind trials (VAS: MD = 0.15, P = 0.72, I.sup.2 = 1%; AOFAS: MD = 2.71, P = 0.17, I.sup.2 = 0%). In the comparison of the PRP and the placebo, the pooled mean difference was - 3.76 (P &lt; 0.0001, 95% CI = - 4.34 to - 3.18). Conclusions No superiority of PRP had been found in well-designed double-blind studies, whereas it is implied that the outcomes of PRP are better than placebo based on available evidence. Keywords: Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroid, Fasciopathy, Therapy</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Corticosteroid</subject><subject>Corticosteroids</subject><subject>Fasciopathy</subject><subject>Glucocorticoids</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Plantar fasciitis</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Platelet-rich plasma</subject><subject>Platelets</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><issn>1749-799X</issn><issn>1749-799X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk2LFDEQbURx19U_4KnBi5de89mpeBCWxY-FhT2o4C2kk8pMhu7OmPQszL83s7OoI5JDKpVXr6oer2leU3JJKfTvCuWEQkcY6QhVwDv1pDmnSuhOaf3j6V_xWfOilA0hkkgQz5szzrQEIvrz5uvdbnFpwtKm0G5Hu-CIS5ejWx9eZbJtSPkQzovNbbDFxbS1y3r_vrXtgGXp8D56nB22ZT8vayyxvGyeBTsWfPV4XzTfP338dv2lu737fHN9dds5KcjSgWJckIEoTqXzEHCQQXngAOgdOOWAcQ6qziw8B-SSBem14oIxH7ge-EVzc-T1yW7MNsfJ5r1JNpqHRMorY_MS3YgGA_FqIA6oBUF7prXUg_La-aCF7UPl-nDk2u6GqfbHecl2PCE9_Znj2qzSvanzCZBQCd4-EuT0c1eFMVMsDseqHKZdMUwIAQqE5BX65h_oJu3yXKWqKEk17bno_6BWti4Q55BqX3cgNVc97wE0oayiLv-DqsfjFF2aMcSaPylgxwKXUykZw-8dKTEHW5mjrUy1lXmwlVH8FyqFvV0</recordid><startdate>20200921</startdate><enddate>20200921</enddate><creator>Yu, Tao</creator><creator>Xia, Jiang</creator><creator>Li, Bing</creator><creator>Zhou, Haichao</creator><creator>Yang, Yunfeng</creator><creator>Yu, Guangrong</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200921</creationdate><title>Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis</title><author>Yu, Tao ; Xia, Jiang ; Li, Bing ; Zhou, Haichao ; Yang, Yunfeng ; Yu, Guangrong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Corticosteroid</topic><topic>Corticosteroids</topic><topic>Fasciopathy</topic><topic>Glucocorticoids</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Plantar fasciitis</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Platelet-rich plasma</topic><topic>Platelets</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Bing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Haichao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Guangrong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Tao</au><au>Xia, Jiang</au><au>Li, Bing</au><au>Zhou, Haichao</au><au>Yang, Yunfeng</au><au>Yu, Guangrong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research</jtitle><date>2020-09-21</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>1-432</pages><artnum>432</artnum><issn>1749-799X</issn><eissn>1749-799X</eissn><abstract>Background Plantar fasciopathy (PF) is a very common disease, affecting about 1/10 people in their lifetime. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) had been demonstrated to be useful in achieving helpful effects for plantar fasciopathy. The purpose of this study was to compare the pain and functional outcomes between PRP and corticosteroid (CS) or placebo for plantar fasciopathy through meta-analysis and provide the best evidence. Methods Literature was searched systematically to explore related studies that were published in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline, SpringerLink, OVID, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Articles regarding comparative research about the outcomes of PRP therapy and CS or placebo injection were selected. Data of pain and functional outcomes was extracted and imported into Reviewer Manager 5.3 to analyze. Results Thirteen RCTs were included and analyzed. Analysis results showed significant superiority of PRP in outcome scores when compared with CS (VAS: MD = - 0.85, P &lt; 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%; AOFAS: MD = 10.05, P &lt; 0.0001, I.sup.2 = 85%), whereas there is no statistical difference in well-designed double-blind trials (VAS: MD = 0.15, P = 0.72, I.sup.2 = 1%; AOFAS: MD = 2.71, P = 0.17, I.sup.2 = 0%). In the comparison of the PRP and the placebo, the pooled mean difference was - 3.76 (P &lt; 0.0001, 95% CI = - 4.34 to - 3.18). Conclusions No superiority of PRP had been found in well-designed double-blind studies, whereas it is implied that the outcomes of PRP are better than placebo based on available evidence. Keywords: Platelet-rich plasma, Corticosteroid, Fasciopathy, Therapy</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32958046</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13018-020-01783-7</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-799X
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2020-09, Vol.15 (1), p.1-432, Article 432
issn 1749-799X
1749-799X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ef0d7b0c81a841629959b7d9cdf94a6f
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Bias
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Corticosteroid
Corticosteroids
Fasciopathy
Glucocorticoids
Orthopedics
Pain
Plantar fasciitis
Plasma
Platelet-rich plasma
Platelets
Sensitivity analysis
Systematic Review
Therapy
title Outcomes of platelet-rich plasma for plantar fasciopathy: a best-evidence synthesis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T02%3A42%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20platelet-rich%20plasma%20for%20plantar%20fasciopathy:%20a%20best-evidence%20synthesis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20and%20research&rft.au=Yu,%20Tao&rft.date=2020-09-21&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=1-432&rft.artnum=432&rft.issn=1749-799X&rft.eissn=1749-799X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13018-020-01783-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA636889012%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c540t-872340b07315cd8feb5f7d8388edc8c7c8233875054d38e352f5d973422df39b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2451916346&rft_id=info:pmid/32958046&rft_galeid=A636889012&rfr_iscdi=true