Psychiatric Comorbidity and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Through the Lens of the Biopsychosocial Model: A Comparative Study

• Published in: Journal of pain research 2020-01, Vol.13, p.3235-3245
• Main Authors: Duong, Hong Phuoc, Konzelmann, Michel, Vuistiner, Philippe, Burrus, Cyrille, Léger, Bertrand, Stiefel, Friedrich, Luthi, François
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: biopsychosocial complexity; Comorbidity; complex regional pain syndrome; Disability; Disease; Emotional disorders; Injuries; intermed; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Mental disorders; Mood disorders; Original Research; Pain; Patients; Post traumatic stress disorder; psychiatric comorbidity; Psychiatrists; Quality of life; Questionnaires; Rehabilitation; Statistical analysis; Trauma
• ISSN: 1178-7090; 1178-7090
• DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S278614

To compare the prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity between patients with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) of the hand and non-CRPS patients and to assess the association between biopsychosocial (BPS) complexity profiles and psychiatric comorbidity in a comparative study. We included a total of 103 patients with CRPS of the hand and 290 patients with chronic hand impairments but without CRPS. Psychiatric comorbidities were diagnosed by a psychiatrist, and BPS complexity was measured by means of the INTERMED. The odds ratios (OR) of having psychiatric comorbidities according to BPS complexity were calculated with multiple logistic regression (adjusted for age, sex, and pain). Prevalence of psychiatric comorbidity was 29% in CRPS patients, which was not significantly higher than in non-CRPS patients (21%, relative risk=1.38, 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.01 p=0.10). The median total scores of the INTERMED were the same in both groups (23 points). INTERMED total scores (0-60 points) were related to an increased risk of having psychiatric comorbidity in CRPS patients (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.23-1.73) and in non-CRPS patients (OR=1.21; 95% CI: 1.13-1.30). The four INTERMED subscales (biological, psychological, social, and health care) were correlated with a higher risk of having psychiatric comorbidity in both groups. The differences in the OR of having psychiatric comorbidity in relation to INTERMED total and subscale scores were not statistically different between the two groups. The total scores, as well as all four dimensions of BPS complexity measured by the INTERMED, were associated with psychiatric comorbidity, with comparable magnitudes of association between the CRPS and non-CRPS groups. The INTERMED was useful in screening for psychological vulnerability in the two groups.