Loading…

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Interventions to involve parents in decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health are associated with positive outcomes. However, appropriately planning effectiveness studies is critical to ensure that meaningful evidence is collected. It is important to conduct pilot stu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JMIR formative research 2021-03, Vol.5 (3), p.e25235-e25235
Main Authors: Liverpool, Shaun, Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3
container_end_page e25235
container_issue 3
container_start_page e25235
container_title JMIR formative research
container_volume 5
creator Liverpool, Shaun
Edbrooke-Childs, Julian
description Interventions to involve parents in decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health are associated with positive outcomes. However, appropriately planning effectiveness studies is critical to ensure that meaningful evidence is collected. It is important to conduct pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention itself and the feasibility of the protocol to test effectiveness. This paper reports the findings from a feasibility and acceptability study of Power Up for Parents, an intervention to promote shared decision-making (SDM) and support parents and caregivers making decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health. A mixed method study design was adopted. In stage 1, health care professionals and parents provided feedback on acceptability, usefulness, and suggestions for further development. Stage 2 was a multicenter, 3-arm, individual, and cluster randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial with parents accessing services related to children's and young people's mental health. Outcome measures collected data on demographics, participation rates, SDM, satisfaction, and parents' anxiety. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Google Analytics estimates were used to report engagement with the prototype. Outcomes from both stages were tested against a published set of criteria for proceeding to a randomized controlled trial. Despite evidence suggesting the acceptability of Power Up for Parents, the findings suggest that recruitment modifications are needed to enhance the feasibility of collecting follow-up data before scaling up to a fully powered randomized controlled trial. On the basis of the Go or No-Go criteria, only 50% (6/12) of the sites successfully recruited participants, and only 38% (16/42) of parents completed follow-up measures. Nonetheless, health care practitioners and parents generally accessed and used the intervention. Themes describing appearance and functionality, perceived need and general helpfulness, accessibility and appropriateness, and a wish list for improvement emerged, providing valuable information to inform future development and refinement of the intervention. Owing to the high attrition observed in the trial, proceeding directly to a full randomized controlled trial may not be feasible with this recruitment strategy. Nonetheless, with some minor adjustments and upgrades to the intervention, this pilot study provides a platform for future eva
doi_str_mv 10.2196/25235
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f06c342039ae4924aed1ae11feeed4bd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f06c342039ae4924aed1ae11feeed4bd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2507255884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdktFqFDEUhgdRbKn7ChIQ0ZvVTDLJbLwQytbahS4WW0GvwpnMmd3U7GRMMsX6Zr6dcXctrVc5_OfPxzk_pygmJX3DSiXfMsG4eFQcMiHLKWfy6-N79UExifGaUsrKUtaKPy0OOJeCqpofFr9PEaJtrLPplkDfkmNjcEiwV3xHgJzYlU3gyKJPGG6wT9b3JHlyOQ6DD4lcriFgS07Q2Jhb0w18t_2K2J7M19a1AftXccv-5sesX6AfHGZpmVEZe4bg0vodWdqfmbLEtPZtJBfW-UQ-529-Y3_lxtz3KXjncnkVLLhnxZMOXMTJ_j0qvpx-uJqfTc8_fVzMj8-nJoeSpqqWSDsmGtVRWhveVVQqUbFaMo6tAoMz1RgDsp5VAikzvO4kR4EcGlEC8qNiseO2Hq71EOwGwq32YPVW8GGlISRrHOqOSsMrRrkCrBSrANtMKMsOEduqaTPr_Y41jM0GW5MDCOAeQB92ervWK3-jayVrxkQGvN4Dgv8xYkx6Y6NB56BHP0bNqrwbrShj2friP-u1H0Ofo9JM0JoJMZtV2fVy5zLBxxiwuxumpPrvbentbWXf8_uT37n-XRL_A4cry8g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507255884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Liverpool, Shaun ; Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</creator><creatorcontrib>Liverpool, Shaun ; Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</creatorcontrib><description>Interventions to involve parents in decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health are associated with positive outcomes. However, appropriately planning effectiveness studies is critical to ensure that meaningful evidence is collected. It is important to conduct pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention itself and the feasibility of the protocol to test effectiveness. This paper reports the findings from a feasibility and acceptability study of Power Up for Parents, an intervention to promote shared decision-making (SDM) and support parents and caregivers making decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health. A mixed method study design was adopted. In stage 1, health care professionals and parents provided feedback on acceptability, usefulness, and suggestions for further development. Stage 2 was a multicenter, 3-arm, individual, and cluster randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial with parents accessing services related to children's and young people's mental health. Outcome measures collected data on demographics, participation rates, SDM, satisfaction, and parents' anxiety. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Google Analytics estimates were used to report engagement with the prototype. Outcomes from both stages were tested against a published set of criteria for proceeding to a randomized controlled trial. Despite evidence suggesting the acceptability of Power Up for Parents, the findings suggest that recruitment modifications are needed to enhance the feasibility of collecting follow-up data before scaling up to a fully powered randomized controlled trial. On the basis of the Go or No-Go criteria, only 50% (6/12) of the sites successfully recruited participants, and only 38% (16/42) of parents completed follow-up measures. Nonetheless, health care practitioners and parents generally accessed and used the intervention. Themes describing appearance and functionality, perceived need and general helpfulness, accessibility and appropriateness, and a wish list for improvement emerged, providing valuable information to inform future development and refinement of the intervention. Owing to the high attrition observed in the trial, proceeding directly to a full randomized controlled trial may not be feasible with this recruitment strategy. Nonetheless, with some minor adjustments and upgrades to the intervention, this pilot study provides a platform for future evaluations of Power Up for Parents. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 39238984; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39238984. RR2-10.2196/14571.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2561-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2561-326X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2196/25235</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33650973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: JMIR Publications</publisher><subject>Age ; Caregivers ; Children &amp; youth ; Clinical decision making ; Data collection ; Decision making ; Families &amp; family life ; Feasibility studies ; Feedback ; Intervention ; Medical research ; Mental health ; Mixed methods research ; Original Paper ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Social networks ; Technology Acceptance Model ; Teenagers ; Websites</subject><ispartof>JMIR formative research, 2021-03, Vol.5 (3), p.e25235-e25235</ispartof><rights>Shaun Liverpool, Julian Edbrooke-Childs. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 02.03.2021.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Shaun Liverpool, Julian Edbrooke-Childs. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 02.03.2021. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0401-4058 ; 0000-0001-6419-8552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2507255884/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2507255884?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33650973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liverpool, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>JMIR formative research</title><addtitle>JMIR Form Res</addtitle><description>Interventions to involve parents in decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health are associated with positive outcomes. However, appropriately planning effectiveness studies is critical to ensure that meaningful evidence is collected. It is important to conduct pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention itself and the feasibility of the protocol to test effectiveness. This paper reports the findings from a feasibility and acceptability study of Power Up for Parents, an intervention to promote shared decision-making (SDM) and support parents and caregivers making decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health. A mixed method study design was adopted. In stage 1, health care professionals and parents provided feedback on acceptability, usefulness, and suggestions for further development. Stage 2 was a multicenter, 3-arm, individual, and cluster randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial with parents accessing services related to children's and young people's mental health. Outcome measures collected data on demographics, participation rates, SDM, satisfaction, and parents' anxiety. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Google Analytics estimates were used to report engagement with the prototype. Outcomes from both stages were tested against a published set of criteria for proceeding to a randomized controlled trial. Despite evidence suggesting the acceptability of Power Up for Parents, the findings suggest that recruitment modifications are needed to enhance the feasibility of collecting follow-up data before scaling up to a fully powered randomized controlled trial. On the basis of the Go or No-Go criteria, only 50% (6/12) of the sites successfully recruited participants, and only 38% (16/42) of parents completed follow-up measures. Nonetheless, health care practitioners and parents generally accessed and used the intervention. Themes describing appearance and functionality, perceived need and general helpfulness, accessibility and appropriateness, and a wish list for improvement emerged, providing valuable information to inform future development and refinement of the intervention. Owing to the high attrition observed in the trial, proceeding directly to a full randomized controlled trial may not be feasible with this recruitment strategy. Nonetheless, with some minor adjustments and upgrades to the intervention, this pilot study provides a platform for future evaluations of Power Up for Parents. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 39238984; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39238984. RR2-10.2196/14571.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Technology Acceptance Model</subject><subject>Teenagers</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>2561-326X</issn><issn>2561-326X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdktFqFDEUhgdRbKn7ChIQ0ZvVTDLJbLwQytbahS4WW0GvwpnMmd3U7GRMMsX6Zr6dcXctrVc5_OfPxzk_pygmJX3DSiXfMsG4eFQcMiHLKWfy6-N79UExifGaUsrKUtaKPy0OOJeCqpofFr9PEaJtrLPplkDfkmNjcEiwV3xHgJzYlU3gyKJPGG6wT9b3JHlyOQ6DD4lcriFgS07Q2Jhb0w18t_2K2J7M19a1AftXccv-5sesX6AfHGZpmVEZe4bg0vodWdqfmbLEtPZtJBfW-UQ-529-Y3_lxtz3KXjncnkVLLhnxZMOXMTJ_j0qvpx-uJqfTc8_fVzMj8-nJoeSpqqWSDsmGtVRWhveVVQqUbFaMo6tAoMz1RgDsp5VAikzvO4kR4EcGlEC8qNiseO2Hq71EOwGwq32YPVW8GGlISRrHOqOSsMrRrkCrBSrANtMKMsOEduqaTPr_Y41jM0GW5MDCOAeQB92ervWK3-jayVrxkQGvN4Dgv8xYkx6Y6NB56BHP0bNqrwbrShj2friP-u1H0Ofo9JM0JoJMZtV2fVy5zLBxxiwuxumpPrvbentbWXf8_uT37n-XRL_A4cry8g</recordid><startdate>20210302</startdate><enddate>20210302</enddate><creator>Liverpool, Shaun</creator><creator>Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</creator><general>JMIR Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0401-4058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-8552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210302</creationdate><title>Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Liverpool, Shaun ; Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Technology Acceptance Model</topic><topic>Teenagers</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liverpool, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>JMIR formative research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liverpool, Shaun</au><au>Edbrooke-Childs, Julian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>JMIR formative research</jtitle><addtitle>JMIR Form Res</addtitle><date>2021-03-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e25235</spage><epage>e25235</epage><pages>e25235-e25235</pages><issn>2561-326X</issn><eissn>2561-326X</eissn><abstract>Interventions to involve parents in decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health are associated with positive outcomes. However, appropriately planning effectiveness studies is critical to ensure that meaningful evidence is collected. It is important to conduct pilot studies to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention itself and the feasibility of the protocol to test effectiveness. This paper reports the findings from a feasibility and acceptability study of Power Up for Parents, an intervention to promote shared decision-making (SDM) and support parents and caregivers making decisions regarding children's and young people's mental health. A mixed method study design was adopted. In stage 1, health care professionals and parents provided feedback on acceptability, usefulness, and suggestions for further development. Stage 2 was a multicenter, 3-arm, individual, and cluster randomized controlled pilot feasibility trial with parents accessing services related to children's and young people's mental health. Outcome measures collected data on demographics, participation rates, SDM, satisfaction, and parents' anxiety. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Google Analytics estimates were used to report engagement with the prototype. Outcomes from both stages were tested against a published set of criteria for proceeding to a randomized controlled trial. Despite evidence suggesting the acceptability of Power Up for Parents, the findings suggest that recruitment modifications are needed to enhance the feasibility of collecting follow-up data before scaling up to a fully powered randomized controlled trial. On the basis of the Go or No-Go criteria, only 50% (6/12) of the sites successfully recruited participants, and only 38% (16/42) of parents completed follow-up measures. Nonetheless, health care practitioners and parents generally accessed and used the intervention. Themes describing appearance and functionality, perceived need and general helpfulness, accessibility and appropriateness, and a wish list for improvement emerged, providing valuable information to inform future development and refinement of the intervention. Owing to the high attrition observed in the trial, proceeding directly to a full randomized controlled trial may not be feasible with this recruitment strategy. Nonetheless, with some minor adjustments and upgrades to the intervention, this pilot study provides a platform for future evaluations of Power Up for Parents. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 39238984; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39238984. RR2-10.2196/14571.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>JMIR Publications</pub><pmid>33650973</pmid><doi>10.2196/25235</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0401-4058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6419-8552</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2561-326X
ispartof JMIR formative research, 2021-03, Vol.5 (3), p.e25235-e25235
issn 2561-326X
2561-326X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f06c342039ae4924aed1ae11feeed4bd
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Age
Caregivers
Children & youth
Clinical decision making
Data collection
Decision making
Families & family life
Feasibility studies
Feedback
Intervention
Medical research
Mental health
Mixed methods research
Original Paper
Parents & parenting
Social networks
Technology Acceptance Model
Teenagers
Websites
title Feasibility and Acceptability of a Digital Intervention to Support Shared Decision-making in Children's and Young People's Mental Health: Mixed Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A32%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20and%20Acceptability%20of%20a%20Digital%20Intervention%20to%20Support%20Shared%20Decision-making%20in%20Children's%20and%20Young%20People's%20Mental%20Health:%20Mixed%20Methods%20Pilot%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JMIR%20formative%20research&rft.au=Liverpool,%20Shaun&rft.date=2021-03-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e25235&rft.epage=e25235&rft.pages=e25235-e25235&rft.issn=2561-326X&rft.eissn=2561-326X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196/25235&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2507255884%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-976e0f25b9f007c3f40695427623ed9ace89bcca67845e02c37f63e5e3ab51ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507255884&rft_id=info:pmid/33650973&rfr_iscdi=true